Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162Problem and Project Based LearningHigher Education and EmployabilityEngineering Education and Curriculum Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Project-based learning as a contributing factor to graduates’ work readiness

Jollands, Margaret, Jolly, Lesley, Molyneaux, Tom·2012·European Journal of Engineering Education

Abstract

This paper explores what work readiness means for two cohorts of graduate engineers, one from a traditional curriculum, the second from a largely project-based curriculum. Professional bodies and employers have defined a set of attributes for engineering graduates so that graduates will be ‘work ready’. Problem-based learning (PBL) is claimed to be a suitable approach to develop such skills. The graduates were interviewed some months after starting work, along with their managers. All the graduates recognised the benefits of taking PBL subjects as well as vacation work, with success in communication attributed more to PBL. Both cohorts had similar learning outcomes, high skill levels in project management, problem solving, communication skills, research and sustainability. A skills gap in ethics was identified for both cohorts of graduates and their managers. Further work is planned to link skill development with undergraduate learning experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03043797.2012.665848

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. ASEE, 1994, The Green Report: Engineering education for a changing world
  2. Engineers Australia, 2011, Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineer
  3. IEAust, 1996, Changing the culture: Engineering education into the future
  4. Litzinger T. A., 2011, et al., 100, 123
  5. Mills, J.E. and Treagust, D.F., 2003. Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based the answer? [online].Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Available from:www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf[Accessed 25 November 2010].

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jollands, M., Jolly, L., & Molyneaux, T.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Jollands, Margaret
Venue
European Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2012-03-22
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
143-154
ISSN
  • 0304-3797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5898
OpenAlex
W2121135355
Cited by
162
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Engineering Education (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
project-based learning, career readiness, engineering graduates, problem-based learning, graduate employability, communication skills, project management skills, problem solving, traditional curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.