The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace
Open accessAbstract
There is an emerging consensus that women’s participation in peace negotiations contributes to the quality and durability of peace after civil war. However, to date, this proposition has remained empirically untested. Moreover, how women’s participation may contribute to durable peace has not been systematically explored. This article uses a mixed method design to examine this proposition. Our statistical analysis demonstrates a robust correlation between peace agreements signed by female delegates and durable peace. We further find that agreements signed by women show a significantly higher number of peace agreement provisions aimed at political reform, and higher implementation rates for provisions. We argue that linkages between women signatories and women civil society groups explain the observed positive impact of women’s direct participation in peace negotiations. Collaboration and knowledge building among diverse women groups contributes to better content of peace agreements and higher implementation rates of agreement provisions. We substantiate this argument with qualitative case study evidence and demonstrate how collaboration between female delegates and women civil society groups positively impacts peace processes. Our findings support the assumption that women’s participation in peace negotiations increases the durability and the quality of peace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846 · cited 8×
“Unless otherwise stated, all data used in this article come from the UCDP (Gleditsch et al. 2002; Harbom, Högbladh, and Wallensteen 2006; Högbladh 2011; Pettersson and Eck 2018).”
MethodInfluentialBrokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
Burt, R. S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199249145.001.0001 · Cited by 2,203
Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
Burt, R. S. (2005) · Cited by 1,856
Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research
LIEBERMAN, E. S. (2005) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055405051762 · Cited by 1,515 · cited 1×
“We apply a mixed method design, or nested analysis (Lieberman 2005).”
MethodAt War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict
Paris, R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790836 · Cited by 1,365
Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790874 · Cited by 1,335
Event history modeling a guide for social scientists
Box‐Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. (2005) · Cited by 1,203
At war's end: building peace after civil conflict
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-3683 · Cited by 913
Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations
Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400837694 · Cited by 864
Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations
Freedman, L. D., Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2006) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20032164 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, J., Krause, W., & Bränfors, P.
- Venue
- International Interactions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-08-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 985-1016
- ISSN
- 0305-0629 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7444
- OpenAlex
- W2885119060
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 40.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03050629.2018.1492386
- The paper
- Krause, J., Krause, W., & Bränfors, P. (2018). Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace. International Interactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2018.1492386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.