Cited by 68Occupational Health and BurnoutTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Interventions fostering well-being of schoolteachers: a review of research

Open access
Dreer, Benjamin, Gouasé, Natalie·2022·Oxford Review of Education

Abstract

Schoolteachers’ well-being is considered an important factor for the functioning and efficacy of school systems around the globe and as a major driver of school development. Evidence suggests that teacher well-being can benefit from tailor-made intervention programmes. Thus, scientifically tested well-being programmes are of great interest for individual teachers (e.g. from a self-help perspective) as well as for school administrators and policy makers (e.g. to offer systemic support). The present paper provides a review of 29 peer-reviewed research papers that focus on interventions fostering well-being in teachers. The results show that a wide range of interventions and measurement approaches have been used and reported. Critically, few studies have used a rigorous methodological approach. On the basis of the review, it can be concluded that the field is still in its formation phase. Interventions as well as the scientific study of such interventions are quite novel in this context. Therefore, four major recommendations for advancing the scientific study of teacher well-being interventions are proposed, including conceptual advances and developments in the design, dissemination and study of interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03054985.2021.2002290

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dreer, B., & Gouasé, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Erfurt (DE)
  • University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Dreer, Benjamin
Venue
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2021-11-30
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
587-605
ISSN
  • 0305-4985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3915
OpenAlex
W3216212422
Cited by
68
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oxford Review of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
teacher well-being, well-being interventions, school teachers, self-help intervention, systemic support, intervention design, intervention dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review