Cited by 49African studies and sociopolitical issuesLand Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

‘Displaced in place’: agrarian displacements, replacements and resettlement among farm workers in Mazowe district

Magaramombe, Godfrey·2010·Journal of Southern African Studies

Abstract

Zimbabwe went into drastic economic decline from the late 1990s. Since then, there have been mass population displacements, including those that resulted from the Fast Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP), which commenced in 2000 and was implemented in the context of acute political crisis, extraordinary hyperinflation, a breakdown in state services, and scarcities of basic commodities. Among the internally displaced are large numbers of farmworkers, as only a small proportion (less than one per cent) were resettled under the fast track programme. Some former farmworkers migrated to towns and cities, communal areas, rural and peri-urban informal settlements or neighbouring countries. But the majority remained in the farm villages, where most were unable to sustain themselves: their dislocation was socio-economic rather than geographical. This article discusses the findings of a study that investigated the effects of the FTLRP by focusing on the lives of farmworkers living on an A2 commercial farm in Mazowe District, Mashonaland Central. It argues that the effects of fast-track land reform in this context were contradictory: on the one hand, it undermined farmworkers' income and livelihoods, at the same time it allowed them residential autonomy and independence in other areas of life. The article sheds light on the experiences of these farmworkers, by considering them as ‘displaced in situ’.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057070.2010.485789

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The commercial farms on private land were highly productive, enhancing food security and providing employment for approximately a third of the Zimbabwean workforce.

    “partly because the commercial farms on private land were highly productive, enhancing food security and providing employment for approximately a third of the Zimbabwean workforce (Kwashirai, 2009; Magaramombe, 2010).”

    From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Magaramombe, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magaramombe, G.
Corresponding author
Magaramombe, Godfrey
Venue
Journal of Southern African Studies
Published
2010-06
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
361-375
ISSN
  • 0305-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3893
OpenAlex
W1999959980
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Southern African Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
fast track land reform, farm workers, resettlement, internally displaced persons, livelihoods, residential autonomy, commercial farms, Mazowe District, Zimbabwe economic crisis, hyperinflation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review