Restructuring of agrarian labour relations after Fast Track Land Reform in Zimbabwe
Abstract
The fast track land redistribution programme generated new agrarian labour relations altering the tying of labour on the large farms to tenancy, supplemented by casual labour from the communal areas. Job losses and displacement occurred, but this is not the whole story as new and diverse sources of rural employment have emerged, including high levels of self-employment on small farms (A1) supplemented by casual employment. Large farms dependent on wage labour experience labour shortages despite the mechanisation drive. However, communal areas and A1 farmers continue to provide labour to large farms, although labour supplies are negotiated on new terms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simple narrative that workers were displaced and remain unemployed is not supported by the evidence.
“The simple narrative that workers were displaced (often in situ ) and that they remain unemployed is not supported by the evidence (Chambati, 2011).”
From Tobacco, contract farming, and agrarian change in Zimbabwe (2018) · cites this paper as Chambati, 2011
Cites
Three decades of agrarian reform in Zimbabwe
Moyo, S. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.583642 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Hellum, A., & Derman, B. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.001 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Magaramombe, G. (2010) · Journal of Southern African Studies · doi:10.1080/03057070.2010.485789 · Cited by 49 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…that this is a conservative orientation towards implicitly defending the poorly remunerated wage labour in the former LSCF. Displacement of former farm workers addresses two groups: those physically displaced from LSCF compounds and those ‘displaced in situ’ (Hartnack 2007, Magaramombe 2010).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zimbabwe's land reform: challenging the myths
Scoones, I., Marongwe, N., Mavedzenge, B., Murimbarimba, F., Mahenehene, J., & Sukume, C. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.622042 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Changing agrarian relations after redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe
Moyo, S. (2011) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.634971 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
“Those few larger-scale farmers using motorised traction include both high and low intensity labour hirers, while the majority hire little labour and are poorly capitalised (see Chambati 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn overview of Fast Track Land Reform in Zimbabwe: editorial introduction
Cliffe, L., Alexander, J., Cousins, B., & Gaidzanwa, R. (2011) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.643387 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Tobacco, contract farming, and agrarian change in Zimbabwe
Scoones, I., Mavedzenge, B., Murimbarimba, F., & Sukume, C. (2018) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12210 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“The simple narrative that workers were displaced (often in situ) and that they remain unemployed is not supported by the evidence (Chambati, 2011).”
BackgroundThe fast-track land reform and agrarian change in Zimbabwe
Mkodzongi, G., & Lawrence, P. (2019) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2019.1622210 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“…reform was redistributive although underpinned by class, gender and ethno-regionalism (Hammar, Raftopoulos and Jensen 2003; Moyo and Yeros 2005, 2007; Moyo et al. 2009; Scoones et al. 2010; Chambati 2011; Moyo 2011a, 2011b; Hanlon, Manjengwa and Smart 2012; Matondi 2012; Mkodzongi 2013a, 2013b).”
BackgroundInfluentialLabour after Land Reform: The Precarious Livelihoods of Former Farmworkers in Zimbabwe
Scoones, I., Mavedzenge, B., Murimbarimba, F., & Sukume, C. (2019) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/dech.12449 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“By the late 1990s, there were estimated to be around 150,000 permanent workers on commercial farms, including estates,4 and the commercial agricultural sector employed around 200,000 additional workers on temporary contracts (Chambati, 2007, 2011; Scoones et al., 2010: 127).”
BackgroundChanging Forms of Wage Labour in Zimbabwe’s New Agrarian Structure
Chambati, W. (2017) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/2277976017721346 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“In general, the public land tenures offered to the new landowners do not enable them to totally enforce the residential labour tenancy (Chambati, 2011; Moyo, 2011a) and thus sometimes face stiff resistance from the farm labourers.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationYoung people and land in Zimbabwe: livelihood challenges after land reform
Scoones, I., Mavedzenge, B., & Murimbarimba, F. (2019) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2019.1610938 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“This investment and accumulation has benefited others, including workers employed by the new farm owners, while displacing others (Chambati 2011; Scoones et al. 2018b); relatives who have come to live in the new farms (Scoones et al.”
BackgroundNgarava, S. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105000 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Beyond gender: interrogating women’s experiences in FTLRP in Zimbabwe
Bhatasara, S., & Chiweshe, M. (2017) · Africa Review · doi:10.1080/09744053.2017.1329808 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“In a similar vein, Chambati (2011) discerned that new and diverse sources of rural employment have emerged, including high levels of self-employment on small farms, albeit supplemented by casual employment.”
BackgroundWho will make the ‘best’ use of Africa’s land? Lessons from Zimbabwe
Manjengwa, J., Hanlon, J., & Smart, T. (2014) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.907722 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Political Economy of Agrarian Labour Relations in Zimbabwe after Redistributive Land Reform
Chambati, W. (2013) · Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/2277976013493570 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationIntroduction to symposium on labor, gender and new sources of agrarian change
Addison, L., & Schnurr, M. (2016) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9656-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Inside an enclave: the dynamics of capitalism and rural politics in a post-land reform context
Mudimu, G., Zuo, T., & Nalwimba, N. (2020) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2020.1722106 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The food shortages resulted in some households engaging in under-consumption, thereby subsidizing the LSCF costs (Chambati 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe changing agrarian economy in Zimbabwe, 15 years after the Fast Track Land Reform programme
Shonhe, T. (2019) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2019.1606791 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“They hire large amounts of permanent and seasonal labour (Chambati 2011) and rely on an increasing number of outgrowers under contract farming (Moyo 2011b).”
BackgroundLivelihoods, Land and Political Economy: Reflections on Sam Moyo’s Research Methodology
Scoones, I. (2016) · Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/2277976016683750 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…early insights have been added to substantially extending the geographic scope, deepening the focal areas and on occasions challenging some of the findings (e.g., Murisa, 2011; Chambati, 2011; Chigumira, 2014; Chiweshe, 2014; Mkodzongi, 2013; Mutopo, 2011; Zamchiya, 2011, 2013; among many others).”
ResultAgricultural commercialisation and changing labour regimes in Zimbabwe
Shonhe, T., Scoones, I., & Murimbarimba, F. (2021) · Journal of Contemporary African Studies · doi:10.1080/02589001.2021.1933397 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Our study shows how access to land and increased opportunities to diversify into offfarm activities now undergirds farmworker social differentiation (cf. Chambati 2011, 2013; Scoones et al. 2018a).”
BackgroundChanging Agrarian Labour Relations after Land Reform in Zimbabwe
Chambati, W. (2013) · CODESRIA eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvk3gnsn.11 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…as suppliers of wage labour to the new farms.6 The perceived political allegiance of farm workers to the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) and white farmers (who are viewed as anti-land reform) was also considered as a justification for their exclusion in land allocation (see Chambati 2011a).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDiscursive hauntings: limits to reinvention for Zimbabwean farm workers after fast-track land reform
Hartnack, A. (2017) · Anthropology Southern Africa · doi:10.1080/23323256.2017.1387500 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Other authors (e.g., Chambati 2011; Scoones et al. 2017), however, have found former workers who feel liberated by the replacement of white commercial farmers with a rural order in which they can make an independent living.”
BackgroundChiweshe, M. K., & Chabata, T. (2019) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2019.1609920 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“According to Chambati (2011), farm labour constituted 26% of the wage labour force by 1999.”
Background“The Land Belongs to Us”: Ethnic Claims Over Land During Zimbabwe’s Land Reforms
Chambati, W., & Mazwi, F. (2022) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221075070 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…in the resettlement areas came from diverse social backgrounds, they have over the years come together to form social networks such as producer organizations, burial societies, cooperatives, and other groupings to pull agrarian labor collectively (see Chambati, 2011; Moyoet al.,2009; Murisa, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPeasant Agency in a Changing Agrarian Situation in Central Zimbabwe: The Case of Mhondoro Ngezi
Mkodzongi, G. (2018) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/2277976018779859 · Cited by 10
“Empirical evidence on the ground (AIAS Survey, 2014; Chambati, 2011; Chambati & Magaramombe, 2008) suggests that farmworkers were active participants in the politics of land rather than mere victims, and that, in some places, such as the Damvuri Conservancy, former farmworkers benefited from the land reform and have b…”
BackgroundRutherford, B. A. (2014) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/joac.12065 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Marewo, M. (2023) · Africa Spectrum · doi:10.1177/00020397231173709 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Post-FTLRP, the texture of agrarian labour in resettlement areas has evolved and exhibits more nuanced labour arrangements than before (Chambati, 2011, 2017; Marewo, 2020, 2022).”
BackgroundZimbabwe’s Command Agriculture: Problems of Planning Under Neoliberalism
Mazwi, F., & Yeros, P. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760231204686 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The broaden - ing of the peasant base as a result of the FTLRP increased the number of peasant households that are now self-employed and engage in maize production (Binswanger-Mkhize & Moyo, 2022; Chambati, 2011).”
BackgroundMazwi, F., Muchetu, R. G., & Mudimu, G. (2021) · Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES · doi:10.1177/2277976020973837 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In the TMAS, land size also determines the class of farmers (Chambati, 2011; Moyo, 2016; Moyo & Yeros, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMarewo, M. (2022) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/00219096221133783 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“It is important to note that the composition of former farm workers is not a homogeneous group; it includes permanent workers who resided on the farms and casual and seasonal workers mostly from nearby farms and communal areas (Chambati, 2011; Moyo, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Reformed Agrarian Structure and Changing Dynamics of Rural Labour Migration in Zimbabwe
Chambati, W. (2022) · Africa Development · doi:10.57054/ad.v47i3.2683 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“That few former farm workers benefited from the FTLRP land allocations indicates their limited prioritisation as a category of beneficiaries targeted to receive land, since they were earmarked to continue their role as wage labourers (Chambati 2011; Scoones et al. 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationLand and Natural Resources in Zimbabwe: Scramble and Resistance
Moyo, S., Chambati, W., & Yeros, P. (2018) · Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5840-0_11 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationDiversification of sugar production in Zimbabwe: wealth accumulation from below by outgrowers
Mazwi, F., & Chambati, W. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement · doi:10.1080/02255189.2023.2276915 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“These traits have been shown to characterise poor peasant households in studies that have been undertaken post-FTLRP (see Chambati 2017, 2011; Mazwi, Muchetu, and Mudimu 2021; Moyo et al. 2009).”
Self-citationDaimon, A. (2021) · Critical African Studies · doi:10.1080/21681392.2021.1935087 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…analysed through the lens of ethnic-nationalism (Rutherford 2008, 2011; Sachikonye 2003, 2005; Moyo 2011; Moyo, Rutherford, and Amanor-Wilks 2000; Chaumba, Scoones, and Wolmer 2003; Moyo and Yeros 2005; Scoones et al. 2010; Chambati 2011, 2013; Hanlon, Manjengwa, and Smart 2012; Mkodzongi 2013).”
BackgroundFarms, farmworkers and new forms of livelihoods in southern Africa
Pilossof, R. (2018) · doi:10.1111/joac.12261 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Política editorial e controvérsia científica em Estudos Agrários*
Pinheiro, J. A. P., & Neves, F. (2022) · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais · doi:10.1590/3710905/2022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“POLÍTICA EDITORIAL E CONTROVÉRSIA CIENTÍFICA EM ESTUDOS AGRÁRIOS10 A retomada do debate ocorreu no JPS, em 2011, com um número especial sobre os resultados da nova política de redistribuição de terras do Zimbábue, a Fast Track Land Reform Program – FTLRP.14 As duas posições na controvérsia foram retomadas em artigos q…”
InfluentialNyoni, C., Chigondo, E. E., Maushe, F., Nyoni, C. M., Marengo, C. T., & Muzavazi, W. T. (2026) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.36941/mjss-2026-0126
“In contexts of poverty and marginalization, livelihood diversification often reflects desperation rather than opportunity, as households patch together minimal income from multiple precarious sources (Chambati, 2011).”
InfluentialConflict Dynamics Between Artisanal Miners and Host Communities in Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe
Tadyanehondo, M. K. T., Makwerere, D., & Mhuri, K. I. (2026) · Journal of Peacebuilding & Development · doi:10.1177/15423166261428732
Chingwanangwana, B., & Kgari-Masondo, M. (2025) · E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences · doi:10.38159/ehass.202561230
Marewo, M. (2023) · Journal of Southern African Studies · doi:10.1080/03057070.2024.2305547
“23 However, these studies provide limited in-depth analysis of linkages between beneficiaries of the FTLRP in resettled areas and people in communal areas of origin using a framework of belonging.”
Background
- Authors
- Chambati, W.
- Corresponding author
- Chambati, Walter
- ORCID
- Chambati, Walter
- Venue
- Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1047-1068
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2108845232
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- fast track land reform, land redistribution, tenancy, casual employment, rural employment, self-employment, smallholder farmers, labor shortage, mechanization, labor supply, displacement, Zimbabwe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review