Cited by 89Education, Philosophy, and SocietyValues and Moral EducationEducational Philosophies and Pedagogies

A capabilities-friendly conceptualisation of flourishing in and through education

Wilson-Strydom, Merridy, Walker, Melanie·2015·Journal of Moral Education

Abstract

This article explores what it means to flourish in and through education and why we should position such flourishing as an issue of morality. We draw on the capabilities approach (CA) advanced by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum and locate the argument in the practical context of higher education (HE) in unequal societies. We use qualitative data from year one of a three-year longitudinal study exploring student agency and well-being at a South African university to consider flourishing in and through education. Using the CA concepts of well-being, agency, practical reason and affiliation, we argue that the CA provides a philosophical grounding that takes account of both personal and relational flourishing and morality. Flourishing in education requires consideration of the well-being and agency of students. Flourishing through education draws attention to the role of education in promoting well-being and flourishing beyond its walls by fostering a social and moral consciousness among students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057240.2015.1043878

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An education that deepens the axiological foundations of democracy in a deliberative sense, from dialogic and cooperative methodologies, promotes the development of citizens as free agents capable of determining their own lives, conversing about the common good, and pursuing self-realization or personal and social flourishing.

    “Based on the UNESCO report (2021), and in response to the post-democratic crisis, in this article we advocate for citizen education that deepens, from dialogic and cooperative methodologies, the axiological foundations of democracy in a deliberative sense, and that promotes the development of citizens as free agents capable of determining their own lives, of conversing about the common good, and”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wilson-Strydom, M., & Walker, M.
Affiliations
University of the Free State (ZA)
Venue
Journal of Moral Education
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
310-324
ISSN
  • 0305-7240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3877
OpenAlex
W1872978118
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
54.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Moral Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
South African National Research Foundation (South African Research Chairs Initiative, Thuthuka Grant 87922)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Keywords
eudaimonia, capability approach, Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum, student agency, student well-being, higher education, moral consciousness, practical reason, affiliation, inequality, South African universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review