Cited by 253African studies and sociopolitical issuesLand Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Three decades of agrarian reform in Zimbabwe

Open access
Moyo, Sam·2011·Journal of Peasant Studies

Abstract

This article examines the empirical facts about the actual outcome of Zimbabwe's land reform, based on years of field research. It shows that the popular assumption about failed land reform in Zimbabwe is wrong on several counts: the character of Zimbabwe's land reform has been redistributive, and the extent of this has been wide enough to trigger significant progressive changes in the agrarian structure. This is despite some elites having benefited from the process and foreign-owned agro-industrial estates and conservancies being retained. The distribution of land among land reform beneficiaries has been relatively uneven, with some receiving larger land allocations than others, and this in turn influenced the differentiated access of these groups to farming services and infrastructure. Yet the productivity of small producers has grown slowly with output escalating recently. Three decades of land reform has recast land-based social relations in important ways, with the poor gaining more than previously believed.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that Zimbabwe’s three decades of land reform, especially the post-2000 Fast Track programme, produced a broadly redistributive shift in land ownership that benefited many poor rural and urban households, not only political elites. It also documents uneven outcomes: agricultural output fell heterogeneously, class and gender/ethnic/nationality inequalities persisted, and farm workers and tenure security remained major unresolved problems.

Key findings

  • By 2009, 6,214 farms covering more than 10 million ha had been acquired; 168,671 families received land, including 145,775 A1 and 22,896 A2 allocations. A1 beneficiaries averaged about 20 ha and held 70% of transferred land; by 2010 over 22,000 A2 beneficiaries had plots averaging about 100 ha. Between 1980 and 2009, over 13 of 15 million ha controlled by about 6,000 white farmers in 1980 went to over 240,000 families.
  • The redistribution was more pro-poor than critics claim: 70% of beneficiaries were on A1 small family farms; war veterans were less than 8% of beneficiaries; urban beneficiaries were 20–30%; 70% were unemployed, mainly rural. Women’s own-right land ownership rose to 12–18%, compared with 4% of white women on LSCF land and 5% of black women in earlier resettlement/communal areas.
  • Agriculture did not simply collapse: by 2008 volume output was about 50% lower and value about 60% lower; among 15 key commodities declines ranged from under 10% to 70% of 1990s averages. Cereal output averaged 30–65% of national requirements and about 65% of 1990s levels; smallholder maize was around 65% of domestic needs and about 15% below 1990s average, while cotton, groundnuts and beans were relatively resilient.
  • Exclusions and insecurities persisted: about 10% of land beneficiaries were former farm workers; roughly 100,000 former farm workers remained as insecure residents and 45,000 were displaced squatters; 68% of farm workers cited lack of secure land as a key problem. By 2006, 78.5% had offer letters, but 13.9% doubted tenure security and 17% were uncertain; 16% had faced eviction threats.

Methods

  • Combines local sub-district field surveys from 2002–2004, an AIAS national baseline survey in 2005–2006 across six districts, and field visits in 2007 and 2009, plus secondary local/national data since 2000.
  • Household interviews covered 2,089 A1 and A2 households (79% A1) and 761 farm workers (414 former, 347 new), using questionnaires, key informant interviews, focus groups, observations and open interviews.
  • The article presents the macro picture; district-level details are being considered for separate publication.

Limitations

  • The paper states it focuses on the macro picture and leaves wider district-level survey details to a separate paper; it also notes data on ethno-regional access to land remain weak and research has not yet quantified the quality of women’s land access under patriarchy.
  • The text acknowledges that multiple/oversized holdings and subletting/fronting are concealed and difficult to verify, and that political party affiliation is elusive to measure; these make some distributional and political claims uncertain.
  • Evident from the text: reliance on self-reported survey responses and incomplete/unallocated land records, plus ongoing litigation and informal land arrangements, limits precise measurement of tenure security and redistribution outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2011.583642

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given

    Unacquired lands represent a combination of export-focused agro-industrial plantations and conservancies and mining farmlands owned by transnational corporations.

    “These unacquired lands represent a combination of export-focused agro-industrial plantations and conservancies and mining farmlands owned by transnational corporations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    This distribution stands in stark contrast to the pre-1980 and pre-1999 situations when agricultural lands were predominantly held by large-scale commercial farms and large estates.

    “This stands in stark contrast to the pre-1980 and pre-1999 situations when agricultural lands were predominantly held by the LSCF farms and large estates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    At that point white farmers comprised about four percent of the new large commercial farming sector, comprising A2 landholders, agro-industrial estates and conservancies.

    “At that point white farmers comprised about four percent of the new large 'commercial' farming sector (comprising A2 landholders, agro-industrial estates and conservancies).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    About 1.7 million hectares had not yet been acquired by 2009.

    “Nevertheless, about 1.7 million hectares had not yet been acquired by 2009.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    In area terms, German, Dutch, Swiss and Italian owners collectively held 70 percent of total foreign-owned farms before the FTLRP.

    “In area terms, the Germans, Dutch, Swiss and Italians collectively held 70 percent of the total foreign-owned farms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 70
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The FTLRP phase officially benefited 168,671 families, comprising mainly the rural poor and their urban counterparts across 9.2 million hectares.

    “The FTLRP phase of the land reform officially benefited 168,671 families, comprising mainly the rural poor and their urban counterparts across 9.2 million hectares.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Land redistribution brought increased access to and better distribution of the benefits from natural resources such as water, indigenous forests and wildlife, as well as other social benefits.

    “Land redistribution also brought along increased access to and better distribution of the benefits from natural resources such as water, indigenous forests and wildlife, as well as other social benefits realised from such resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The bulk, over 70 percent, of this land has since been redistributed mostly to A1 and A2 beneficiaries as of 2010.

    “However, the bulk (over 70 percent) of this land has since been redistributed mostly to A1 and A2 beneficiaries as of 2010.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Some of the better-off black middle class, entrepreneurs and political elites also gained land, sometimes claiming to be landless.

    “Some of the better-off black middle class, entrepreneurs and political elites also gained land, sometimes claiming to be 'landless', due to past racial-and class-based segregation and exclusions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The scale of state farming land decreased to about 115,601 hectares while private transfers to a few black capitalist farmers with large-scale commercial farms amounted to 530,632 hectares.

    “The scale of state farming land decreased to about 115,601 hectares while the private transfers to a few black capitalist farmers with LSCF amounted to 530,632 hectares.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    These families acquired an average 20 hectares of land, and hold 70 percent of the transferred land, through the A1 schemes.

    “These families acquired an average 20 hectares of land, and hold 70 percent of the transferred land, through the A1 schemes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    By 2010 over 22,000 new small, medium, and large-scale capitalists also benefited with relatively larger plots averaging about 100 hectares under the A2 scheme; this scheme had benefited about 16,000 families in 2008.

    “By 2010 over 22,000 new small, medium, and large-scale capitalists also benefited with relatively larger plots averaging about 100 hectares under the A2 scheme.This scheme had benefited, about 16,000 families in 2008.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    By 2009, 6,214 farmland properties covering above 10 million hectares were being acquired, but not all were allocated, and 168,671 families gained land.

    “By 2009, 6,214 farmland properties covering above 10 million hectares were being acquired, but not all were allocated, and 168,671 families gained land (see Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The FTLRP chose not to redistribute state agricultural lands but to expand them, even though there are popular demands for such land.

    “The FTLRP chose not to redistribute these lands but to expand them, even though there are popular demands for such land.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Large agro-industrial plantations or estates and conservancies were not substantively expropriated, although they lost some land and/or were partially illegally occupied.

    “Interestingly, the large agro-industrial plantations or estates and conservancies were not substantively expropriated, although they lost some land and/or were partially 'illegally' occupied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Between 1980 and 2009, over 13 of the 15 million hectares of land controlled mostly by 6,000 white farmers in 1980 had been transferred to over 240,000 families of largely rural origin, but in a relatively differentiated manner.

    “Between 1980 and 2009, over 13 of the 15 million hectares of land, which in 1980 were controlled mostly by 6,000 white farmers, had been transferred to over 240,000 families of largely rural origin, but in a relatively differentiated manner (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    By 2009, less than 400 individually owned white farms remained.

    “By 2009, less than 400 individually owned white farms remained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Government of Zimbabwe reports that there are over 100,000 people on its waiting lists for land, indicating that there is still very high demand for land despite the redistribution.

    “Meanwhile, the GoZ (MLRR 2009) reports that there are over 100,000 people on its waiting lists for land, indicating that there is still very high demand for land despite the redistribution, especially when we add the demands for residential land in urban and rural areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MLRR 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    A larger proportion of women, between 12 and 18 percent, now own land in their own right, compared to four percent of white women who owned large-scale commercial farm lands and five percent of black women who controlled land in previous resettlement areas and communal lands.

    “A larger proportion of women, between 12 and 18 percent, now own land in their own right (Buka 2002, Utete 2003, GoZ 2007), compared to the four percent of white women who owned LSCF lands (Rugube et al. 2003, Moyo 1998) and the five percent of black women who controlled the land in previous resettlement areas and communal lands (see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buka 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Utete 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites GoZ 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    As a result of land redistribution, about 13 percent of Zimbabwe's entire agricultural land is now held by middle-scale farmers, over 70 percent by small farm producers, and only 11 percent by large farms and estates.

    “As a result of land redistribution, about 13 percent of Zimbabwe's entire agricultural land is now held by a range of middle-scale farmers (on A2, LSCF and small-scale commercial farms [SSCF]), while over 70 percent is held by small farm producers (in the Communal Areas, in A1 areas and in informal settlements), and only 11 percent is held by large farms and estates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most LSCF were multiple farm owners with average landholdings above 1,000 hectares.

    “Most of the LSCF were multiple farm owners with average landholdings above 1,000 hectares”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Middle farms range in size from about 50 to 150 hectares, combine draught and mechanical power, use relatively more hired labour alongside family labour, and crop relatively larger areas (with fertilisers) than small producers.

    “Middle farms range in size from about 50 to 150 hectares, combine draught and mechanical power, use relatively more hired labour alongside family labour, and crop relatively larger areas (with fertilisers) than small producers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The numbers of peasants and small-to medium-scale farmers increased, and together they control over 80 percent of the land, leading to a significantly reduced number of large-scale farms and estates.

    “The numbers of peasants and small-to medium-scale farmers increased, and together they control over 80 percent of the land, leading to a significantly reduced number of large-scale farms and estates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By 2006 up to 78.5 percent of the land beneficiaries confirmed having 'land offer letters', while the rest claimed to have already received GoZ lease documents and title deeds.

    “By 2006 up to 78.5 percent of the land beneficiaries confirmed having 'land offer letters', while the rest claimed to have already received GoZ lease documents and title deeds (Moyo et al. 2009, Mhishi 2007), 7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moyo et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mhishi 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Fewer than 25 percent of beneficiaries continue to retain their formal employment, with most of these having originated from urban areas.

    “Fewer than 25 percent of beneficiaries continue to retain their formal employment, with most of these having originated from urban areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The land tenure system is socially differentiated as the A2 beneficiaries are provided long lease contracts while the A1 beneficiaries get vague permits.

    “The land tenure system is socially differentiated as the A2 beneficiaries are provided long lease contracts while the A1 beneficiaries get vague permits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    There is a new wave of large-scale foreign investments in agriculture, mainly on remaining private estates, the DTZ and state estates.

    “There is also a new wave of large-scale foreign investments in agriculture, mainly on the remaining private estates, the DTZ and state estates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Membership of political parties has been malleable over the last decade and is a highly elusive variable to measure given sensitivities and multiple tactical allegiances.

    “the membership of political parties has been malleable over the last decade, and it is a highly elusive variable to measure given the sensitivities and multiple tactical allegiances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    By 2002, over 50,000 people had applied for A2 plots, far more than the 8,000 who had been offered land.

    “The dilemma facing the policy elites by 2002 was that over 50,000 people had applied for A2 plots, far more than the 8,000 who had been offered land (Utete 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Utete 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The main process of change has been the expansion in number and area of small cultivators and the expansion of the new 'middle farmer', at the expense of the few formerly large-scale farmers.

    “The main process of change has been the expansion in number and area of small cultivators and the expansion of the new 'middle farmer', 6 at the expense of the few formerly 6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The smaller segment of large-scale capitalist farmers now includes both black and white farmers, but their landholdings have been substantially downsized to an average of 700 hectares, compared to the average of 2,000 hectares held by large-scale landowners in the past.

    “The smaller segment of large-scale capitalist farmers now includes both black and white farmers, but their landholdings have been substantially downsized to an average of 700 hectares, compared to the average of 2,000 hectares held by large-scale landowners in the past.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    About 26 percent of the A1 land beneficiaries shared land, while only 15 percent of the A2 households did.

    “About 26 percent of the A1 land beneficiaries shared land, while only 15 percent of the A2 households did (Moyo et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moyo et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    About 10 percent of the land beneficiaries were former farm workers who were allocated A1 or A2 plots, some as farm workers, a few as 'land occupiers', and others as members of communal area structures rather than as farm workers.

    “Nonetheless about 10 percent of the land beneficiaries were former farm workers who were allocated A1 or A2 plots, some as farm workers, a few as 'land occupiers' (Sadomba 2008, Moyo et al. 2009), and others as members of communal area structures rather than as farm workers (Chambati 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sadomba 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moyo et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Chambati 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most beneficiaries came from rural areas, largely from Communal Areas, with some from the farm worker populations in LSCF areas.

    “Most beneficiaries came from rural areas, largely from Communal Areas, with some from the farm worker populations in LSCF areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    As a follow-up assessment of the land tenure right, a 99-year lease document has been given to some A2 landholders, while an A1 permit is still to be issued.

    “As a follow-up assessment of the land tenure right, a 99year lease document has been given to some A2 landholders, while an A1 permit is still to be issued.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    From 2003, the state mounted an extensive scheme to promote agricultural mechanisation, but it was the medium to large new farmers who got the lion's share of this.

    “From 2003, the state mounted an extensive scheme to promote agricultural mechanisation.But it was the medium to large new farmers who got the lion's share of this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A substantial number of agro-industrial estates, conservancies, foreign owned farms and a few white LSCFs were retained, although they are outnumbered by and have less land than small-to medium-scale farms.

    “A substantial number of the agro-industrial estates, conservancies, foreign owned farms and a few white LSCFs were retained, although they are outnumbered by and have less land than the small-to medium-scale farms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Maize and cotton yields in Zimbabwe declined most, with small producer maize yields below one tonne per hectare and middle farmers yields below three tonnes per hectare, in comparison to the dryland potential of ten tonnes per hectare.

    “Maize and cotton yields in Zimbabwe declined most, with small producer maize yields below one tonne per hectare (FAO 2008(FAO , 2009) ) and middle farmers yields below three tonnes per hectare, in comparison to the dryland potential of ten tonnes per hectare (Rukuni et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites FAO 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Rukuni et al. 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Maize produced largely by small farmers comprised around 65 percent of domestic requirements during most non-drought years, and was barely 15 percent below the average levels of maize production during the 1990s.

    “Even the maize produced, largely by small farmers, comprised around 65 percent of domestic requirements during most non-drought years, and was barely 15 percent below the average levels of maize production during the 1990s (Moyo 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moyo 2011 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The pre-2000 average agricultural production levels provide a valid baseline for measuring post-2000 production decline.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Some agricultural capital stock such as irrigation infrastructure, processing facilities and machinery and equipment that were on the former farms were disabled during the fast track process, and this had some effect on constraining production levels; however some of the new farmers acquired some of these technologies from former farmers.

    “Some agricultural capital stock such as irrigation infrastructure, processing facilities and machinery and equipment that were on the former farms were disabled during the fast track process, and this had had some effect on constraining production levels; however some of the new farmers acquired some of these technologies from former farmers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most large-scale private agricultural lands owned by minority white large-scale farmers and foreign capital in large estates were expropriated and allocated largely free of charge to mainly poor non-landed beneficiaries, as well as to numerous middle class and some black elite beneficiaries.

    “Most of the large-scale private agricultural lands owned by the minority white large-scale farmers and foreign capital in large estates was expropriated and allocated largely free of charge to mainly poor non-landed beneficiaries, as well as to numerous 'middle class' and some 'black elite' beneficiaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    There was an upsurge in the production of some critical food crops, such as dry edible beans, as well as of small stock rearing.

    “There was also an upsurge in the production of some critical food crops, such as dry edible beans (see Table 10), as well as of small stock rearing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Since the GoZ abandoned structural adjustment in 1996, its relations with the West have been polarised, leading to major contradictions with capital; Bretton Woods loans and aid were cut, Western capital retreated, a sanctions regime was elaborated, and material support was given to the opposition.

    “Since the GoZ abandoned structural adjustment in 1996, its relations with the West have been polarised, leading to major contradictions with capital.The Bretton Woods loans and other forms of aid were cut, Western capital retreated, and a sanctions regime was elaborated, while material support was given to the opposition (see Elich 2002, Mamdani 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Elich 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mamdani 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Agricultural production in volume terms declined by about 50 percent in 2008, and by closer to 60 percent in foreign exchange or general value terms, with output declines among the 15 key commodities varying from less than 10 percent to 70 percent of the 1990s average levels.

    “Agricultural production in volume terms had declined by about 50 percent in 2008 -by closer to 60 percent in foreign exchange or general value terms -although among the 15 key agricultural commodities, output declines varied from between less than 10 percent to 70 percent of the 1990s average levels of production.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pre-2000 average agricultural production levels provide a valid baseline for measuring post-2000 production decline.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Disaggregated labour hiring patterns suggest that about 26 percent of land beneficiaries use hired labour intensively, while on average most households command family labour pools of 3.5 persons.

    “Disaggregated labour hiring patterns (Chambati and Moyo 2009) suggest that about 26 percent of land beneficiaries use hired labour intensively, while on average most households command family labour pools of 3.5 persons (see Table 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chambati and Moyo 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Table 5

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The level of agricultural tractorisation in Zimbabwe (at 75 per km2) varies by sub-sector and is relatively low compared to South Africa; cropped areas of grains did not decline, except for wheat because of its specific mechanisation deficits.

    “While, the level of agricultural tractorisation in Zimbabwe (at 75 per km 2 ) also varies by sub-sector, and is relatively low compared to South Africa, cropped areas of grains did not decline, except for wheat because of its specific mechanisation deficits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In 2000, agricultural land legalistically refers to the 11.7 million hectares of LSCF, although in practice the 16.4 million hectares of the Communal Areas are functionally agricultural lands, bringing the entire area of Zimbabwe's agricultural land to 28.1 million hectares.

    “In 2000, agricultural land legalistically refers to the 11.7 million hectares of LSCF, although in practice the 16.4 million hectares of the Communal Areas are functionally agricultural lands, bringing the entire area of Zimbabwe's agricultural land to 28.1 million hectares.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The heterodox plan did not seem to be adequately coordinated, especially in relation to food production and exports, and it soon faced implementation problems, including general evasion of controls and countervailing underground trade and petty businesses.

    “The heterodox plan did not seem to be adequately coordinated, especially in relation to food production and exports, and it soon faced implementation problems, including the general evasion of the controls (e.g. in maize marketing) and countervailing 'underground' trade and petty businesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Fewer than expected farm workers gained land rights.

    “Undoubtedly, fewer than expected farm workers gained land rights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Since 2009, the Inclusive Government has not secured the requisite willingness, orientation, and capacity to effect desired interventionist agrarian policies, nor effectively mobilised popular social forces in support of egalitarian agrarian reform.

    “Since 2009, the Inclusive Government has not secured the requisite willingness, orientation, and capacity to effect the desired interventionist agrarian policies, nor has it effectively mobilised popular social forces in support of egalitarian agrarian reform in favour of domestic accumulation, expanded employment and a growing home market.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Approximately a quarter of the remaining large scale farms are registered as private companies.

    “Approximately, a quarter of the remaining large scale farms are registered as private companies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The food production base has expanded and has shown signs of increased growth since 2009.

    “but the food production base has expanded and has shown signs of increased growth since 2009.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Farm labour is now employed by a diverse range of smaller farm employers and in non-farm self-employment and paid activities, freed from depending on the few LSCF employers.

    “Freed from depending on the few LSCF employers, farm labour is now employed by a diverse range of smaller farm employers and in non-farm self-employment and paid activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Borderline on S4 (based): unclear from the text. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The productivity of the small and medium farm sector grew slowly since 2000 as compared to previous levels, but the food production base has expanded and has shown signs of increased growth since [cut off].

    “The productivity of the small and medium farm sector grew slowly since 2000 as compared to previous levels, but the food production base has expanded and has shown signs of increased growth since”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pre-2000 average agricultural production levels provide a valid baseline for measuring post-2000 production decline.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    These foreign land holdings were relatively large in scale compared to the wider land grabbing underway in Africa.

    “These foreign land holdings were relatively large in scale compared to the wider land grabbing that is underway in Africa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Since the white population is less than 75,000, well below half a percent of the total population, if former white farmers constitute at least one percent of A2 farmers, or about 100 of the remaining large-scale commercial farmers, then their representation would be proportionate.

    “Since demographically the white population, which is less than 75,000, is well below half a percent of the total population, if former white farmers constitute at least one percent of A2 farmers, or about 100 of the remaining LSCF farmers (excluding the mainly foreign white-owned large agro-industrial corporations), then their representation would be proportionate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By 1999 Zimbabwe had about 4,500 large-scale commercial farmers, including individually operated and corporate farms and estates, and these farmers owned over 9,000 farmland properties with separate title deeds.

    “By 1999 Zimbabwe had about 4,500 LSCF (Large-Scale Commercial Farms) farmers, including individually operated and corporate farms and estates (plantations).These 4,500 'farmers' owned over 9,000 farmland properties with separate title deeds”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rutherford 2001
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Access to land, particularly in the A2 scheme, tended to be partly shaped by ethno-regional affinities throughout all the provinces, although the policy was that the A2 scheme was national.

    “Consequently, access to land, particularly in the A2 scheme, tended to be partly shaped by ethno-regional affinities throughout all the provinces, although the policy was that the A2 scheme was 'national'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Land reform was, for some, intended to deracialise commercial farming.

    “land reform was, for some, intended to 'deracialise' commercial farming (Nkomo 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nkomo 2001

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The post-2000 land reform has resulted in a range of exclusions and inclusions, resulting in a highly differentiated pattern.

    “The post-2000 land reform has resulted in a range of exclusions and inclusions, resulting in a highly differentiated pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Redistributive land reforms would break down the territorial and social segregation of Communal Areas from former large-scale commercial farming areas in local administration and land tenure regulation, and enable the free flow of people, goods, services, and livestock between them.

    “Redistributive land reforms would, it was argued, breakdown the territorial and social segregation of Communal Areas from former large-scale commercial farming areas in terms of local administration and land tenure regulation, and enable the free flow of people, goods, services, and livestock between them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Zimbabwe implemented land reform in three phases: first through 1985 market sales led by state land acquisition and redistribution and illegal land occupations; second from 1986 until 1999 through ESAP state acquired some land through expropriation and market mechanisms; third FTLRP began in 2000 and entailed intensive land expropriation alongside illegal land occupations and continued until 2010.

    “During the last three decades, Zimbabwe implemented land reform in three phases.The first phase, lasting through 1985, consisted of market sales of land led by state land acquisition and redistribution.It also entailed intensive illegal land occupations.”
    • Also stated in: § Land redistribution over three decades · plain
      “The second phase, from 1986 until 1999, through the era of the Economic Structural Adjustment Programme (ESAP), enabled the state to acquire some land through expropriation and market mechanisms.”
    • Also stated in: § Land redistribution over three decades · plain
      “The third, FTLRP phase, which began in 2000 and entailed intensive land expropriation alongside 'illegal land occupations', has continued until 2010.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This reflects a simmering ethnicised intra-class competition for land, replicating incipient tendencies in the 1990s.

    “This reflects a simmering ethnicised intra-class competition for land, replicating incipient tendencies in the 1990s (Moyo 1995(Moyo , 1999)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Moyo 1995

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moyo 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe was conceived to relieve landlessness and overcrowding.

    “More critically, redistributive land reform in Zimbabwe was conceived to relieve landlessness and 'overcrowding'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Women mostly benefited from access to land as spouses, implying a subordinate level of control over such land.

    “Women mostly benefited from access to land as spouses, implying a subordinate level of control over such land.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Any degree of the incidence of multiple land holding is non-compliant with policy and diminishes the redistributive character of the land reform.

    “Nonetheless any degree of the incidence of multiple land holding is non-compliant with policy and diminishes the redistributive character of the land reform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The FTLRP's policy objective was redistributive land reform.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Social differentiation in access to land had a class dimension, such that the outcome has the potential to reconfigure class formation processes.

    “Social differentiation in access to land also had a class dimension, such that the outcome has the potential to reconfigure class formation processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These findings confirm the shift towards increased demand for land that occurred in the context of declining formal employment and wages under structural adjustment in the 1990s, as well as an urban response to the deepening economic crises that evolved during the 2000s.

    “These findings confirm the shift towards increased demand for land that occurred in the context of declining formal employment and wages under structural adjustment in the 1990s, as well as an urban response to the deepening economic crises that evolved during the 2000s.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Excessive money printing drove hyperinflation which reinforced the 'informalisation' process, alongside the corruption of some in authority.

    “Excessive money printing drove hyperinflation which reinforced this 'informalisation' process, alongside the corruption of some in authority.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The prospect for progressive agrarian reform in Zimbabwe is promising although this has been circumscribed by a combination of forces, including strains in relations between local capital and the state, and the reaction of local and foreign capital to the replacement of former landowners.

    “The prospect for progressive agrarian reform in Zimbabwe is promising although this has been circumscribed by a combination of forces, including the recent strains in the relations between local capital and the state apparatus, and the reaction of local and foreign capital to the replacement of the economically conservative and politically reactionary former landowners, who have retained strong”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although the shortages were ascribed to absence of investor confidence, risks of doing business and absence of land tenure security, both international isolation and sanctions and the retreat of capital played critical roles in engendering the downward spiral.

    “Although this was ascribed to the absence of 'investor confidence', the 'risks of doing business in Zimbabwe' and the absence of land tenure security, both international isolation and sanctions and the retreat of capital played critical roles in engendering this downward spiral.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The extent of redistribution was wide enough to significantly alter property relations in terms of relative land distribution and the socialisation of property rights, triggering dynamic changes in agrarian social relations.

    “Indeed, the extent of redistribution was wide enough to significantly alter property relations in terms of relative land distribution and the socialisation of property rights, in turn triggering dynamic changes in agrarian social relations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Re-peasantisation has been a significant phenomenon of agrarian change under fast-track land reform, with the entry of urban working class elements into the A1 and resettlement schemes, leading to the growth of a class of new petty commodity producers, which now account for 93.7 percent of total new farming establishments.

    “Re-peasantisation has therefore been a significant phenomenon of agrarian change under fast-track land reform, with the entry of urban working class elements into the A1 and resettlement schemes, leading to the growth of a class of new petty commodity producers, which now account for 93.7 percent of total new farming establishments (Moyo and Yeros 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moyo and Yeros 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Agrarian politics after the peak of FTLRP land transfers in 2004 shifted from inter-class and intra-class contests over access to land towards competing claims for and access to public resources for agrarian accumulation and social reproduction.

    “Agrarian politics after the peak of FTLRP land transfers in 2004 shifted from the inter-class and intra-class (white-black) contests over access to land towards competing claims for and access to public resources for agrarian accumulation and social reproduction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A key regressive feature of the land reform outcome is the substantial enlargement of the upper middle and elite class beneficiaries, most of whom call for even larger land allocations under freehold tenure.

    “Despite the outcome being generally progressive, a key regressive feature is the substantial enlargement of the upper middle and elite class beneficiaries, most of whom call for even larger land allocations under freehold tenure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Contract farming, akin to share-cropping, appears to have replaced agricultural credit in scale, given the financial isolation of Zimbabwe.

    “The latter which is akin to 'share-cropping' appears to have replaced agricultural credit in scale, given the financial isolation of Zimbabwe (i.e. through a range of 'sanctions').”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The pattern of low levels of mechanization, fertilizer and pesticide utilization suggests a regression in the agricultural technological transition, and in part accounts for the decline in crop productivity.

    “This pattern of low levels of mechanization, fertilizer and pesticide utilization suggests a regression in the agricultural technological transition, and in part accounts for the decline in crop productivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Clearly the land and labour rights of farm workers remain poor.

    “Clearly the land and labour rights of farm workers remain poor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Production levels remain below expectations, largely due to shortages of fertilisers, irrigation facilities and draft power arising from reduced domestic agro-industrial input supply capacities and foreign exchange constraints on imports.

    “Production levels remain below expectations, largely due to the shortages of fertilisers, irrigation facilities and draft power arising from reduced domestic agro-industrial input supply capacities and foreign exchange constraints on imports.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Agrarian production relations have been restructured by broadening the food and export production base, although this is characterised by critical inequalities in access to agricultural inputs, public subsidies and finance, contingent on an unfolding social differentiation among beneficiaries within the bi-modal agrarian reform policy.

    “Agrarian production relations have been restructured by broadening the food and export production base, although this is characterised by critical inequalities in access to agricultural inputs, public subsidies and finance, contingent on an unfolding social differentiation among the beneficiaries within the bi-modal agrarian reform policy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Zimbabwe experience is particularly relevant for other former settler-colonial countries.

    “This is particularly relevant for other former settler-colonial countries.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Zimbabwe's land reform did not lead to the comprehensive dissolution of the political power of large agrarian capital, which operates in tandem with international capital.

    “This is not surprising, given that Zimbabwe's land reform did not lead to the comprehensive dissolution of the political power of large agrarian capital, which operates in tandem with international capital.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The state apparatus has been overwhelmed by middle class black 'empowerment' demands, reflecting qualitative shifts in the nature of state power, which the new farmers are constituent parts of and directly lobby.

    “Furthermore, the state apparatus has been overwhelmed by middle class black 'empowerment' demands, reflecting the qualitative shifts in the nature of state power, which the new farmers are constituent parts of and directly lobby.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This played a critical role in the wider economic collapse of Zimbabwe, and in the shift in the correlation of forces around agrarian radicalism and neoliberal inspired regime change.

    “This played a critical role in the wider economic collapse of Zimbabwe, and in the shift in the correlation of forces around agrarian radicalism and neoliberal inspired regime change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The redistributive outcome entailed critical class-and gender-based distributional biases, reflecting unequal class-based patriarchal power.

    “The redistributive outcome, however, entailed critical class-and gender-based distributional biases, reflecting unequal class-based patriarchal power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Alternative sources of financing Zimbabwe's agrarian reform have been limited.

    “alternative sources of financing Zimbabwe's agrarian reform have been limited”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The reforms in Zimbabwe entailed the mobilisation of both popular direct action for land reform and an expropriation policy, and the state sought to meet both the popular demands for land and those of the middle classes, the bureaucracy and national elites.

    “The reforms in Zimbabwe entailed the mobilisation of both popular direct action for land reform and an expropriation policy, and the state sought to meet both the popular demands for land and those of the middle classes, the bureaucracy and national elites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Zimbabwe experience illustrates that even under neoliberalism, the potential for radical land reform exists, especially where land ownership grievances relate to minority racial and foreign dominance in addition to class difference.

    “Nonetheless, the Zimbabwe experience illustrates that even under neoliberalism, the potential for radical land reform exists, especially where land ownership grievances relate to minority racial and foreign dominance in addition to class difference.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
83 of 83
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The FTLRP's policy objective was redistributive land reform.

    “how this contradicts the policy objective of redistributive land reform”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The land occupations after the FTLRP were illegal.

    “illegal land occupiers”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pre-2000 average agricultural production levels provide a valid baseline for measuring post-2000 production decline.

    “Agricultural production of Zimbabwe's 15 main commodities, in terms of their value and volumes produced by most farmers, had by 2009 fallen below the pre-2000 average levels, in a highly heterogeneous manner (see Table 9).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The AIAS Baseline Survey (2007) data on investments is representative of land reform beneficiaries in Zimbabwe.

    “Contrary to the impression that new farmers were not investing on the new land due to land tenure insecurity and collateral issues, survey data shows that there has been substantial investment (see Table 10).”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zimbabwe's land reform of 2000 transferred over 10 million hectares of land to around 146,000 smallholder farm families (A1) and 23,000 medium-scale farms (A2).

    “Zimbabwe's controversial land reform of 2000 transferred over 10 million hectares of land to around 146,000 smallholder farm families (in so -called A1 resettlement areas) and 23,000 medium -scale farms (A2 resettlements)”

    From Tobacco, contract farming, and agrarian change in Zimbabwe (2018) · cites this paper as Moyo, 2011

    Table 1 (shown under Conclusion; page unavailable) lists 145,775 A1 and 22,896 A2 beneficiaries, matching the rounded figures. It lists 10,816,886 hectares in gazetted farms, but the Land redistribution over three decades section says not all of that land had been allocated. The source therefore does not support saying that over 10 million hectares were transferred to those beneficiaries. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Reported average plot size is below the A1 average

    Minor

    The paper reports an average of 20 hectares for the beneficiary families, but even the A1 figures in Table 2 give 39.5 hectares per beneficiary. The average across A1 and A2 beneficiaries would be higher still.

    Reported 20 · recomputed 39.507138

  • Masvingo's A2 percentage does not match its count

    Minor

    Table 1 gives Masvingo 1,348 A2 beneficiaries and an A2 total of 22,896. Its share is 5.9%, rather than the 34.5% printed in the provincial row.

    Reported 34.5 · recomputed 5.887491

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. AAIZ. National Women's Land Rights Conference Report. A report on conference held by ActionAid International Zimbabwe, Women and Land in Zimbabwe, Women, Land and Water Rights in Southern Africa, Zimbabwe Women's Resource Centre and Network and the Women's Coalition of Zimbabwe. 25–26 March2009, New Ambassador Hotel, Harare, Zimbabwe.
  2. ANC Conference. ANC 52 nd National Conference 2007– Resolutions. ANC Conference held at the University of Limpopo in Polokwane. 16–20 December.
  3. Chambati W., 2004, Reform and the Political Economy of Agricultural Labour
  4. Chambati, W. 2009. “Land reform and changing agrarian labour processes in Zimbabwe. Thesis (MA)”. South Africa: University of Witwatersrand.
  5. Chang H., 2009, Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa: potential and challenges, 82
  6. Chingarande S., 2008, Contested terrain: land reform and civil society in contemporary Zimbabwe, 275
  7. Edigheji O., 2006, The emerging South African democratic developmental state and the people's contract
  8. Evans P. B., 2009, Constructing a democratic developmental sate in South Africa: potential and challenges, 37
  9. 2007, Preliminary national A2 land audit report
  10. Jirira, K. M. and Halimana, M. C. 2008. “A gender audit of women and land rights in Zimbabwe. Desk review final report”. Prepared for The Zimbabwe Women's Resource Centre and Network (ZWRCN)'s Project for the European Commission and Action Aid UK on women, land and economic rights
  11. Maast, M. 1996. “The harvest of independence: commodity boom and socio-economic differentiation among peasants in Zimbabwe. Thesis (PhD)”. Denmark: Roskilde University.
  12. Mamdani M., 2008, Lessons of Zimbabwe
  13. Marongwe, N. 2009. “Interrogating Zimbabwe's Fast Track Land Reform and Resettlement Programme: a focus on beneficiary selection. Thesis (PhD)”. Cape Town, South Africa: University of the Western Cape.
  14. Mhishi, M. L. A general overview of the legal aspects of leasehold tenure, conveyancing and land transfer. Unpublished paper prepared for the AIAS Land Tenure Policy Review Dialogue. Harare.
  15. Midzi, P. and Jowah, E. Land Administration in Zimbabwe. Unpublished paper prepared for the AIAS Land Tenure Policy Review Dialogue. Harare.
  16. Ministry of Agriculture and Mechanisation and Irrigation Development. 2010b. “Agricultural Statistical Bulletin”. Government of Zimbabwe. 2010 Government Printers Harare
  17. Moyo S., 1998, The Land Acquisition Process in Zimbabwe
  18. Moyo S., 2005, Land, poverty and livelihoods in an era of globalisation: perspective from developing and transition countries, 344
  19. Moyo S., 2009, Fast Track Land Reform baseline survey in Zimbabwe: trends and tendencies, 2005/06
  20. Murisa, T. 2010. “Emerging forms of social organisation and agency in the newly resettled areas of Zimbabwe: the cases of Goromonzi and Zvimba districts. Thesis (PhD)”. Rhodes University.
  21. Nkomo M. J., 2001, The story of my life
  22. Richardson C., 2005, Cato Journal, 25, 541
  23. Rugube, L. Land transactions monitoring and evaluation of public and private land markets in redistributing land in Zimbabwe . Paper prepared for Land Tenure Center, University of Winsconsin-Madison and Centre for Applied Social Science. University of Zimbabwe.
  24. Rukuni, M., Nyoni, M. J. and Sithole, E. November 2009. “Policy options for optimisation of the use of land for agricultural productivity and production in Zimbabwe”. November, Document submitted to the Agrarian Sector Technical Review Group (ASTRAG), World Bank.
  25. Rutherford B., 2003, Zimbabwe's unfinished business: rethinking land, state and nation in the context of crisis, 191
  26. Scarnecchia, T. and 33 other scholars. 2008. “Response to lessons of Zimbabwe”. Available from:http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n01/letters.html[Accessed December 2008]
  27. Sukume C., 2003, Farm sizes, decongestion and land use: implications of the Fast Track Land Redistribution Programme in Zimbabwe
  28. Utete C. M.B., 2003, Volumes 1 and 2: Main report to his Excellency The President of The Republic of Zimbabwe, Presidential Land Review Committee (PLRC)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moyo, S.
Corresponding author
Moyo, Sam
Venue
Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2011-07
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
493-531
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
OpenAlex
W1987944545
Cited by
253
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
41.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land reform, land redistribution, Zimbabwe, agrarian structure, land allocation, smallholder productivity, land reform beneficiaries, conservancies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review