Forests lost and found in tropical Latin America: The woodland ‘green revolution.
Open accessAbstract
Forest dynamics in the Latin American tropics now take directions that no one would have predicted a decade ago. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has dropped by over 80 percent, a pattern mimicked elsewhere in Amazonia, and is down by more than a third in Central America. Forest resurgence – increasing forest cover in inhabited landscapes or abandoned lands – is also expanding. In Latin America, woodland cover is increasing, at least for now, more than it is being lost. These dramatic shifts suggest quite profound and rapid transformations of agrarian worlds, and imply that previous models of understanding small-farmer dynamics merit significant review centering less on field agriculture and more on emergent forest regimes, and in many ways a new, increasingly globalized economic and policy landscape that emphasizes woodlands.This paper analyzes changing deforestation drivers and the implications of forest recovery and wooded landscapes emerging through social pressure, social policy, new government agencies, governance, institutions, ideologies, markets, migration and ‘neo-liberalization’ of nature. These changes include an expanded, but still constrained, arena for new social movements and civil society. These point to significant structural changes, changes in tropical natures, and require reframing of the ‘peasant question’ and the functions of rurality in the twenty-first century in light of forest dynamics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cattle ranching transforms social and landscape realities through a frontierization process that standard land-use change analyses do not always capture.
“However, to regard it in isolation as a mere supply chain would be elusive, for cattle ranching arguably transforms social and landscape realities through a frontierization process that standard land-use change analyses do not always capture (Hecht, 2014).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Hecht, 2014
The Amazon operates as an extra-legal space, vulnerable to pervasive environmental crimes and land-grabbing practices that utilize cattle as a tool.
“In typical frontier fashion, the Amazon also operates as an extra-legal space, vulnerable to pervasive environmental crimes and land-grabbing practices that utilize cattle as a tool (Hecht, 2014;Fernandes et al., 2023).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Hecht, 2014
Cites
The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Nepstad, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Filho, B. S., & Merry, F. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0036 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Nevle, R. J., Bird, D. K., Ruddiman, W. F., & Dull, R. A. (2011) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/0959683611404578 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meeting the Food Security Challenge for Nine Billion People in 2050: What Impact on Forests?
Bahar, N. H. A., Lo, M., Sanjaya, M., Van Vianen, J., Alexander, P., Ickowitz, A., & Sunderland, T. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102056 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Hecht, S. B.
- Corresponding author
- Hecht, Susanna B.
- ORCID
- Hecht, Susanna B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-08-30
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 877-909
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2004920190
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
- Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
- Keywords
- deforestation, forest recovery, tropical Latin America, Brazilian Amazon, Central America, smallholder farming, peasant question, rurality, social movements, civil society, forest governance, agricultural transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review