Cited by 109Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentSocial Sciences and Humanities

Forests lost and found in tropical Latin America: The woodland ‘green revolution.

Open access
Hecht, Susanna B.·2014·The Journal of Peasant Studies

Abstract

Forest dynamics in the Latin American tropics now take directions that no one would have predicted a decade ago. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has dropped by over 80 percent, a pattern mimicked elsewhere in Amazonia, and is down by more than a third in Central America. Forest resurgence – increasing forest cover in inhabited landscapes or abandoned lands – is also expanding. In Latin America, woodland cover is increasing, at least for now, more than it is being lost. These dramatic shifts suggest quite profound and rapid transformations of agrarian worlds, and imply that previous models of understanding small-farmer dynamics merit significant review centering less on field agriculture and more on emergent forest regimes, and in many ways a new, increasingly globalized economic and policy landscape that emphasizes woodlands.This paper analyzes changing deforestation drivers and the implications of forest recovery and wooded landscapes emerging through social pressure, social policy, new government agencies, governance, institutions, ideologies, markets, migration and ‘neo-liberalization’ of nature. These changes include an expanded, but still constrained, arena for new social movements and civil society. These point to significant structural changes, changes in tropical natures, and require reframing of the ‘peasant question’ and the functions of rurality in the twenty-first century in light of forest dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2014.917371

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hecht, S. B.
Corresponding author
Hecht, Susanna B.
Venue
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2014-08-30
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
877-909
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
OpenAlex
W2004920190
Cited by
109
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
Keywords
deforestation, forest recovery, tropical Latin America, Brazilian Amazon, Central America, smallholder farming, peasant question, rurality, social movements, civil society, forest governance, agricultural transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review