Cited by 53Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementRural Development and Agriculture

On the margins of soy farms: traditional populations and selective environmental policies in the Brazilian Cerrado

Open access
Eloy, Ludivine, Aubertin, Catherine, Toni, Fabiano, Lúcio, Silvia Laine Borges, Bosgiraud, Marion·2016·The Journal of Peasant Studies

Abstract

In the Cerrado, the expansion of soybean cultivation since the 1990s has coincided with the strengthening of environmental regulations. We analyze how the two main environmental policies – Protected Areas and the Forest Code – have played out at the ground level in western Bahia state. These policies in Cerrado have not been designed to curb the expansion of this agricultural frontier. These norms have, on the contrary, accommodated this expansion because the way environmental managers selectively choose environmental problems and publicize them through specific information systems depreciates traditional fire-dependent production systems. These ‘politics of selection’ are likely to increase competition for resources in the margins of soybean agriculture, which is where traditional populations have now become confined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03066150.2015.1013099

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bassett, T.J., and K.B. Zueli. 2000. Environmental discourses and the Ivorian Savanna. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, no. 1: 67-95.
  2. Brannstrom, C., and P.R.B. Brandão. 2012. Two hundred hectares of good business: Brazilian agri- culture in a themed space. Geographical Review 102, no. 4: 465-85.
  3. Ferreira, I.N.R. 2010. Parcerias para a Gestão Ambiental em Propriedade Rurais: o Caso de Lucas do Rio Verde -MT. Master's dissertation, Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Universidade de Brasília.
  4. Gaspar, M.T.P. 2006. Sistema Aqüífero Urucuia : caracterização regional e propostas de gestão. PhD thesis in Geology, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia.
  5. Nogueira, M.C.R. 2009. Gerais a dentro e a fora : identidade e territorialidade entre Geraizeiros do Norte de Minas Gerais. PhD Thesis in anthropology, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia.
  6. Zimmerer, K.S. 2000. The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, no. 2: 356-69.
  7. Zimmerer, K.S. 2011. 'Conservation booms' with agricultural growth?. Sustainability and Shifting Environmental Governance in Latin America, 1985-2008 (Mexico, Costa Rica, Brazil, Peru, Bolivia). Latin American Research Review Special Issue: 82-113.
  8. Catherine Aubertin is an environmental economist, working mainly on the political economy of bio- diversity. She is a researcher at the IRD (Institut de recherche pour le développement, France) and a visiting researcher at the Instituto de Estudos Socioambientais (IESA), Goiás Federal University, Brazil. Her research activities are now focused on the market-based instruments used by environ- mental policies. She is co-editor-in-chief of the journal Natures, Sciences, Sociétés. Email: Catherine.Aubertin@ird.fr

Authors
Eloy, L., Aubertin, C., Toni, F., Lúcio, S. L. B., & Bosgiraud, M.
Affiliations
  • Acteurs, Ressources et Territoires dans le Développement (FR)
  • Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement (FR)
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • ISTOM - École supérieure d'agro-développement international (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Peasant Studies
Published
2015-06-24
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
494-516
ISSN
  • 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9361
OpenAlex
W2248538798
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The Journal of Peasant Studies (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (SMI 2014)
  • European Union (FP7-2010/SSH-CT-2010-266.710)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
soybean expansion, environmental policy, protected areas, Forest Code, traditional communities, environmental management, agricultural frontier, resource competition, western Bahia, Cerrado

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review