The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contested landscapes: the global political economy of climate-smart agriculture
Open accessAbstract
Analysing key initiatives in the area of climate-smart agriculture and the politics which surround them, this paper identifies the dominant discourses shaping the debate through a discussion of discursive sites of power and by mapping the emerging ‘regime complex’ of institutional power that operates at the interface of the climate and agrifood system. This is connected to forms of material power that derive from control over production, finance and technology in the neoliberal food regime by transnational capital. Such an analysis has important implications for which solutions are promoted as part of climate-smart agriculture and which actors are likely to benefit from the flows of technology, finance and institutional support that are mobilised in the struggle to define a viable global agrifood system in a warming world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Regime Complex for Climate Change
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592710004068 · Cited by 2,047
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers
Garnett, T. (2009) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006 · Cited by 569 · cited 1×
“The contribution of the powerful meat and dairy industry in particular has attracted attention and controversy given the land, energy and water inputs required to rear livestock, as well as the resultant methane emissions (Kirby 2011; Garnett 2009).”
Background
Cited by
Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review
Fielke, S., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763 · Cited by 331
Dauvergne, P. (2022) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381 · Cited by 321
Abegunde, V. O., Sibanda, M., & Obi, A. (2019) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli7110132 · Cited by 293
Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Hackfort, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212345 · Cited by 186
Franco, J. C., & Borras, S. M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.013 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Newell, P., & Taylor, O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Peasant Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-129
- ISSN
- 0306-6150 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9361
- OpenAlex
- W2613294194
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contested landscapes: the global political economy of climate-smart agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03066150.2017.1324426
- The paper
- Newell, P., & Taylor, O. (2018). Contested landscapes: the global political economy of climate-smart agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1324426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
