Cited by 321Global trade, sustainability, and social impactImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietySustainable Supply Chain Management

Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs

Dauvergne, Peter·2022·Review of International Political Economy

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is set to greatly enhance the productivity and efficiency of global supply chains over the next decade. Transnational corporations are hailing these gains as a ‘game changer’ for advancing environmental sustainability. Yet, looking through a political economy lens, it is clear that AI is not advancing sustainability nearly as much as industry leaders are claiming. As this article argues, the metrics and rhetoric of corporate social responsibility are exaggerating the benefits and obscuring the costs of AI. Productivity and efficiency gains in the middle sections of supply chains are rebounding into more production and consumption, doing far more to enhance the profitability of big business than the sustainability of the earth. At the same time, AI is accelerating natural resource extraction and the distancing of waste, casting dark shadows of harm across marginalized communities, fragile ecosystems, and future generations. The micro-level gains from AI, as this article exposes, are not going to add up to macro-level solutions for the negative environmental consequences of global supply chains, while portraying AI as a force of sustainability is legitimizing business as usual, reinforcing a narrative of corporate responsibility, obfuscating the need for greater state regulation, and empowering transnational corporations as global governors. These findings extend the theoretical understanding in the field of international political economy of the hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dauvergne, P.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Dauvergne, Peter
Venue
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
696-718
ISSN
  • 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4526
OpenAlex
W3082005054
Cited by
321
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
19.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of International Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
artificial intelligence, global supply chains, environmental sustainability, political economy of technology, multinational corporations, corporate social responsibility, rebound effect, resource extraction, waste, marginalized communities, government regulation, corporate governance, environmental costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review