The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Investigating the effect of academic procrastination on the frequency and variety of academic misconduct: a panel study
Abstract
In prior studies, academic procrastination has been discussed as an influencing factor of academic misconduct. However, empirical studies were conducted solely cross-sectionally and investigated only a few forms of academic misconduct. This large scale web-based study examined the responses of between 1359 and 2207 participants from different academic disciplines at four German universities to address the effect of academic procrastination on seven different forms of academic misconduct (using fraudulent excuses, plagiarism, copying from someone else in exams, using forbidden means in exams, carrying forbidden means into exams, copying parts of homework from others, and fabrication or falsification of data) and its variety. In measuring academic procrastination six months prior to academic misconduct, we found that academic procrastination affected the frequency of all forms of academic misconduct and its variety. We found the strongest effect of academic procrastination on using fraudulent excuses. Implications for university counseling and theory are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The Practice of Social Research
Neustadtl, A., & Babbie, E. R. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318433 · Cited by 14,434
Southwestern Social Science Association (2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,619
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 · Cited by 10,197
Journal of social behavior and personality
(1986) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(86)90025-5 · Cited by 6,751
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2000-2001.
Rudner, L. M., & Schafer, W. D. (2001) · Practical assessment, research & evaluation · Cited by 3,905
Steel, P. (2007) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 · Cited by 3,417
Hilbe, J. M. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973420 · Cited by 3,352
Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys
Groves, R. M. (2006) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfl033 · Cited by 2,420
Hilbe, J. M. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811852.007 · Cited by 1,998
Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates.
Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.503 · Cited by 1,788
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Göritz, A.S. 2006. Incentives in web surveys: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science 1, no. 1: 58–70.
- 10.2307/3149860 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grunschel, C., Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Fries, S. (2016) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.008 · Cited by 278
Self-citationAcademic interventions for academic procrastination: A review of the literature
Zacks, S., & Hen, M. (2018) · Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community · doi:10.1080/10852352.2016.1198154 · Cited by 227
Baran, L. N., & Jonason, P. K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238141 · Cited by 134
Scheunemann, A., Schnettler, T., Bobe, J., Fries, S., & Grunschel, C. (2021) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-021-00571-z · Cited by 127
Self-citationCerezo, R., Esteban, M., Sánchez‐Santillán, M., & Núñez, J. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01403 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Patrzek, J., Sattler, S., van Veen, F., Grunschel, C., & Fries, S.
- Affiliations
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Patrzek, Justine
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-14
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1014-1029
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2036604372
- Semantic Scholar
- 230cb6ba07a206e9a27afd29402c9eee908b3785
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01PH08024, 01PH08005A)
- Rectorate Fellowship of the Bielefeld University (3521.01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- academic procrastination, academic misconduct, plagiarism, cheating, fabrication and falsification, academic dishonesty, university students, student counseling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
