The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Abstract
This article addresses the issue of student writing in higher education. It draws on the findings of an Economic and Social Research Council funded project which examined the contrasting expectations and interpretations of academic staff and students regarding undergraduate students' written assignments. It is suggested that the implicit models that have generally been used to understand student writing do not adequately take account of the importance of issues of identity and the institutional relationships of power and authority that surround, and are embedded within, diverse student writing practices across the university. A contrasting and therefore complementary perspective is used to present debates about ‘good˚s and ‘poor˚s student writing. The article outlines an ‘academic literacies˚s framework which can take account of the conflicting and contested nature of writing practices, and may therefore be more valuable for understanding student writing in today's higher education than traditional models and approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Cited by
The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11 · Cited by 1,223
Self-citationDiffering perceptions in the feedback process
Carless, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572132 · Cited by 1,102
Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect?
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930903541007 · Cited by 735
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.3.02 · Cited by 547
“Writing is already a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments (Lea & Street, 1998).”
BackgroundFeedback: Focusing attention on engagement
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-172
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2061433932
- Cited by
- 2,604
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 180.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075079812331380364
- The paper
- Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.