Cited by 550Artificial Intelligence in EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarismArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI)

Open access
Crawford, Joseph, Cowling, Michael, Allen, Kelly-Ann·2023·Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice

Abstract

The OpenAI’s ChatGPT-3, or Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer was released in November 2022 without significant warning, and has taken higher education by storm since. The artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot has caused alarm for practitioners seeking to detect authenticity of student work. Whereas some educational doomsayers predict the end of education in its current form, we propose an alternate early view. We identify in this commentary a position where educators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character. Such students know how to use ChatGPT for good, and can engage effectively with the ChatGPT application. In building our ChatGPT argument, we acknowledge the existing literature on plagiarism and academic integrity, and consider leadership as a root support mechanism, character development as an antidote, and authentic assessment as an enabler. In doing so, we highlight that while ChatGPT – like papermills, and degree factories before it – can be used to cheat on university exams, it can also be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students. In doing so, we offer a commentary that offers opportunities for practitioners, and research potential for scholars.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This commentary argues that higher education should respond to ChatGPT not only with detection or bans, but with teacher leadership, character development, and authentic assessment to support ethical and deeper learning. It proposes that ChatGPT can support flow, basic psychological needs, and formative feedback, while acknowledging risks of plagiarism and overreliance.

Key findings

  • The authors argue that effective teacher leadership and character development are needed so students use ChatGPT “for good, rather than for personal benefit,” rather than relying solely on detection or punishment.
  • They propose ChatGPT can support positive learning outcomes by reducing cognitive load and enabling flow, supporting autonomy, competence, and relatedness, and providing 24/7 formative feedback and confidence-building.
  • They argue ChatGPT can enable authentic assessment—for example, applying theory to complex cases, storyboards, or podcasts—rather than assessments that ask students to regurgitate textbook content.
  • The paper cites contextual numbers: ChatGPT reached 100 million users in less than 2 months; student cheating admissions rose from 3% in 1963 to 64% in 2015; human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT-generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts; and one professor reported 14 of 163 students caught using ChatGPT to cheat.

Methods

  • Design: a commentary/position paper guided by the research question, “What are the opportunities of ChatGPT in higher education practice?”
  • Data or sample: no empirical sample; the authors draw on existing literature and on ChatGPT-generated responses to prompts, which are quoted as indented italicised paragraphs.
  • Main analysis: conceptual argument organised around four opportunities—character-based leadership, flow, basic psychological needs, and ChatGPT as student assistant—plus discussion of authentic assessment.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it offers an “early view” and that peer-reviewed literature on ChatGPT is limited, with few quality studies in top-tier journals at the time.
  • The paper acknowledges that ChatGPT outputs are not actually ChatGPT’s opinion but “a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update,” and that the veracity of its output should always be questioned.
  • Evident from the text: this is a commentary without empirical data, sample, or systematic analysis; its claims about benefits rely on author propositions and ChatGPT self-assessment rather than tested outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53761/1.20.3.02

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Conclusion

    When asked to apply authentic leadership theory to Apple, ChatGPT provided a reasonable response connecting the theory to elements of Apple's CEO and business practices.

    “If the tool is asked to apply a particular theory to a particular organisation (our test prompt was 'Does authentic leadership apply to Apple?' and ChatGPT provided a reasonable response that connected the theory to elements of Apple's CEO and business practices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § Conclusion

    When asked to determine and defend the 'best' leadership style for Apple if it were post losses, ChatGPT's response was less definitive.

    “When asking ChatGPT to determine and defend the 'best' leadership style for Apple if it were post losses, the AI chatbot's response was less definitive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    A multipronged response that includes character development and detection is more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription.

    “The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites LaMontagne et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    In these scenarios it was the leadership of teachers that influenced the extent to which students would engage in effective or ineffective learning.

    “In these scenarios it was the leadership of teachers that influenced the extent to which students would engage in effective or ineffective (e.g., cheating) learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crawford, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § The good and the bad of AI ChatGPT

    A doctoral candidate with minimal training in grading papers or integrity-detection may have considerable challenge in identifying when students use the AI tool to cheat.

    “This indicates, from a practical perspective, that a doctoral candidate with minimal training in grading papers or integrity-detection may have considerable challenge in identifying when students use the AI tool to cheat.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 66
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    Writing is a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments.

    “Writing is already a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lea & Street, 1998

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concerns with artificial intelligence

    ChatGPT offers better student autonomy and wellbeing for learners.

    “Third, ChatGPT we argue, offers better student autonomy and wellbeing for learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Introduction Rising stress and anxiety in university students

    Students who experience high stress are particularly susceptible to engaging in plagiarism or the misuse of AI technology.

    “Students who experience high stress are particularly susceptible to engaging in plagiarism or the misuse of AI technology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Effective teacher leadership is needed to develop student character so they use ChatGPT for good, rather than for personal benefit.

    “We argue that effective teacher leadership is needed to develop student character so they use ChatGPT for good, rather than for personal benefit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    ChatGPT can be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students.

    “we highlight that while ChatGPT -like papermills, and degree factories before it -can be used to cheat on university exams, it can also be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    It is possible ChatGPT could support facilitation of a flow state.

    “It is possible it could support facilitation of a flow state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    To combat prospective cheating or misuse of ChatGPT, cultivating a sense of moral character in students is an imperative.

    “It is our proposition therefore that to combat prospective cheating or misuse of the ChatGPT application, and future artificial intelligence chatbots and tools, by cultivating a sense of moral character in students as an imperative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Academic Editors

    It may be that students who feel academic pressure are prone to using AI to complete assignments and AI technology may be one way some students cope with stress.

    “It may be that students who feel academic pressure are prone to using AI to complete assignments and AI technology may be one way some students cope with stress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concerns with artificial intelligence

    Removing the noise from their studies supports deeper learning and flow states.

    “Second, remove the noise from their studies to support deeper learning and flow states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection.

    “The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The good and the bad of AI ChatGPT

    There are risks to overreliance on ChatGPT.

    “So, there are risks to overreliance, and it could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    Educators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character.

    “We identify in this commentary a position where educators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Leadership is a root support mechanism, character development an antidote, and authentic assessment an enabler for responding to ChatGPT in higher education.

    “we acknowledge the existing literature on plagiarism and academic integrity, and consider leadership as a root support mechanism, character development as an antidote, and authentic assessment as an enabler.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Effective leadership opportunities embedded into core curriculum may pose a possible antidote to future convenience that students might be afforded by difficult-to-detect cheating practices.

    “For this, effective leadership opportunities embedded into core curriculum may pose a possible antidote to whatever future convenience that students might be afforded by difficult-todetect cheating practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Concerns with artificial intelligence

    Character-based leadership development will support a response to the fear of cheating, not purely detection.

    “First, we argue that it is character-based leadership development that will support a response to the fear of cheating, not purely detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion.

    “The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The good and the bad of AI ChatGPT

    ChatGPT could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.

    “So, there are risks to overreliance, and it could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    ChatGPT offers students the opportunity to simplify the learning process to create less distraction, and more flow.

    “ChatGPT offers students the opportunity to simplify the learning process to create less distraction, and more flow.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    The use of ChatGPT requires a change in the way students are assessed.

    “The use of the tool requires a change in the way students are assessed, however.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusion

    For many universities, a fear-based ban response is an example of exercising fear in the advent of new tools that challenge us.

    “And, for many universities, a fear-based ban response is an example of this.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    ChatGPT-3 provides real-time, 24/7 support for feedback, help, and suggestions.

    “Real-time, 24/7 support is available for feedback, help, and suggestions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    Such a focus may enable students to inquire more deeply into their content and material and engage in deeper forms of learning.

    “Such a focus may enable students to inquire about their content and material more deeply, and indeed engage in deeper forms of learning (e.g., Archer-Kuhn, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Archer-Kuhn, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    AI provides an alternative pathway to learning.

    “It does, however, provide an alternative pathway to learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    The veracity of ChatGPT output should always be questioned.

    “The way that ChatGPT works means that whilst it will produce output, the veracity of this output should always be questioned”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.

    ChatGPT does not actually understand what it's saying.

    “Intriguingly, this means that ChatGPT does not actually understand what it's saying”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Academic Editors

    The percentage of students who admit to cheating has increased significantly in recent years; in 1963 only 3% admitted cheating on exams, while in 2015 that number had risen to 64%.

    “In 1963, for instance, only 3 percent of students admitted to cheating on exams, while in 2015, that number had risen to 64 percent and some studies identify higher rates”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McCabe et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wright, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    The issue of students cheating on their assignments is not new practice.

    “The issue of students cheating on their assignments is not new practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    In a context where increasing numbers of university students feel lonely and isolated, ChatGPT-3 could fill a part of this void.

    “In a context where increasing numbers of university students feel lonely and isolated (Thomas et al., 2020), ChatGPT-3 could fill a part of this void.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thomas et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    Students can still have ChatGPT supplement their language or provide tips on making a podcast, but it does not purely replace the student creating the podcast.

    “While the students can still have ChatGPT supplement their language, or provide tips on making a podcast, it does not purely replace the student creating the podcast; an assessment-for-learning activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    There is opportunity to consider assessment that is less traditional, such as drawing a storyboard for a process-related assessment, or making a podcast about a core topic.

    “Likewise, there is also opportunity to consider assessment that is less traditional, such as drawing a storyboard for a process-related assessment, or making a podcast about a core topic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    While ChatGPT data may generally be correct and it can support higher volume scholarly work, it still needs a critical reader.

    “That is, while the data may generally be correct, and it can support higher volume scholarly work (Liebrenz et al., 2023), it still needs a critical reader in its work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liebrenz et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    Using ChatGPT to produce a summative result is rife with risk.

    “In this way, using ChatGPT to produce a summative result is rife with risk.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The artificial intelligence history

    The progression of AI has grown and accelerated, with LLM AIs like ChatGPT creating radical change in the way people do, be, and learn.

    “Indeed, the progression of artificial intelligence has grown and accelerated in the past years, with the LLM AIslike ChatGPTcreating radical change in the way people do, be, and learn.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Moral disengagement and motivated forgetting of bad decisions are two key mechanisms by which students can feel comfortable with cheating.

    “Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided, two key mechanisms by which students can feel comfortable with cheating”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shu et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    ChatGPT-3 places autonomy in the hands of the student.

    “ChatGPT-3 places autonomy in the hands of the student.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    With the right assessment and curriculum design, ChatGPT could enable students to be more critical in their learning rather than anxious about lacking references or misplaced commas.

    “This opportunity, with the right assessment and curriculum design, could enable students to be more critical in their learning, rather than anxious that they have a lack of references, or that commas are in the wrong place (Gravett & Kinchin, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gravett & Kinchin, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    ChatGPT itself suggests a mechanism by which the tool might be used to improve quality of submission for students.

    “Instead, ChatGPT itself suggests a mechanism that the tool might be used to improve quality of submission for students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.

    ChatGPT generates its output based on the prompt, using a pre-trained model built from a large corpus of data scraped from the internet.

    “ChatGPT generates its output based on the prompt, using a pre-trained model that has been built from a large corpus of data (big data) that ChatGPT has scraped the internet for.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    Assuming students build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure the final output is correct, this has the potential to produce a more useful result reflecting the students' ideas and approach while allowing them to express themselves as a form of 'transition pedagogy'.

    “Assuming they build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct, this has the potential to produce a more useful result, reflecting the students' ideas and approach, but allowing them to express themselves as a form of 'transition pedagogy'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Students will build the capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    ChatGPT can help students identify areas they have missed, provide light guidance on where they might read more, and foster a sense of connection to supplement existing peer and teacher connections.

    “It can help students to identify areas they have missed, provide light guidance on where they might read more, and foster a sense of connection (albeit human-robot connection) to supplement existing peer and teacher connections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    Authentic assessment questions where the answers are multiple will enable students to learn with the aid of ChatGPT, but not exclusively with it.

    “It is likely in these sorts of authentic assessment questionswhere the answers are multiplethat will enable students to learn with the aid of ChatGPT, but not exclusively with it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    ChatGPT's output is not actually its own opinion but a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update.

    “While this bullish answer would perhaps be expected from a machine being asked to evaluate itself, it is worthwhile remembering that this is not actually ChatGPT's opinion, but a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    These systems and practice have still plagued higher education.

    “Yet, these systems and practice have still plagued higher education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    This may be through effective teacher role modelling, through leadership development opportunities, or through continuous self-awareness, ethics, and decision-making training to build critical thinkers with a firm moral compass.

    “This may be through effective teacher role modelling, through leadership development opportunities, or through continuous self-awareness, ethics, and decision-making training to build critical thinkers with a firm moral compass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    ChatGPT-3 may support students by bolstering their feelings of competence by equipping them with the skills and resources needed for a set writing task.

    “ChatGPT-3 may also support students by bolstering their feelings of competence by equipping them with the skills and resources needed for a set writing task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    There may be space for ChatGPT-3 to foster relatedness for university students.

    “There may be space for ChatGPT-3 to foster relatedness for university students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Conclusion

    Early assessment could receive feedback from ChatGPT, with the quality of the student prompts assessable.

    “Early assessment could receive feedback from ChatGPT, with the quality of the student prompts assessable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT being asked to critique a mock student reflection.

    Asking ChatGPT to challenge the assumptions made in a student reflection may support elevated self-awareness and more critical thinking.

    “This activity may support elevated self-awareness and more critical thinking (see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Conclusion

    ChatGPT can be encouraged in the same way software tools like Grammarly can be used to support learning.

    “Instead, and perhaps unlike papermills, ChatGPT can be encouraged in the same way software tools like Grammarly can be used to support learning (Thi & Nikolov, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thi & Nikolov, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    Many students are still developing their capacity for critical thinking.

    “it is likely many students are still developing their capacity for critical thinking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    ChatGPT is likely to entrench existing views of the world rather than what the world ought to be.

    “it is likely to entrench existing views of the world rather than what the world ought to be.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusion

    By embedding AI like ChatGPT into subjects and courses, we might be able to teach students ethical use of such devices.

    “That is, by embedding AI like ChatGPT into subjects and courses, we might be able to teach students ethical use of such devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § The advent of ChatGPT

    ChatGPT reached 100 million users in less than 2 months.

    “with an oft-quoted statistic that ChatGPT was able to reach 100 million users in less than 2 months”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hu, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    Without an evaluation step conducted by somebody with expertise, the output of ChatGPT remains underutilised.

    “ChatGPT quite rightly acknowledges that without an evaluation step conducted by somebody with expertise, the output of the tool remains underutilised.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    The use of an AI tool like ChatGPT could free students from the demand for cognitive resources to reach a state of flow and become fully immersed in the task.

    “To support students to be more immersed in their learning, it is possible that the use of an AI toollike ChatGPTcould free students from the demand for cognitive resources to reach a state of flow and become fully immersed in the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.

    ChatGPT has created a significant level of concern in the higher education sector.

    “it is in producing this that ChatGPT has created a significant level of concern in the higher education sector.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusion

    While AI can help students learn, it does not substitute learning.

    “While AI can help students learn, it does not substitute learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    By requiring students to carefully construct prompts and evaluate results, potentially with a tutor providing formative feedback, ChatGPT can be used to support students and build their confidence.

    “By requiring students to carefully construct their prompts and evaluate their results, potentially in the presence of a tutor in the form of formative feedback, ChatGPT can be used to support students and build their confidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided.

    “Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusion

    The ChatGPT software tool has raised significant questions for the future of higher education.

    “The ChatGPT software tool has raised significant questions for the future of higher education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § ChatGPT being asked to critique a mock student reflection.

    ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots provide an opportunity for students to seek feedback on their assignments and to have their beliefs questioned and challenged.

    “In the realm of assessment ChatGPT, and similar AI chatbots, provide an opportunity for students to seek feedback on their assignments, and to have their beliefs questioned and challenged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    By dissecting ChatGPT output, students can leverage the tool to support and improve quality of submission.

    “And in dissecting the ChatGPT output, students can begin to leverage the tool to support and improve quality of submission, in line with the original ideals of AI first espoused back in the 1950s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    The emergent literature contains an implied assumption that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them.

    “There is an implied assumption in the emergent literature that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them (e.g., Pavlik, 2023;Perkins, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pavlik, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Perkins, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Papermills and contract cheating firms have challenged the sector to detect the authenticity of work.

    “More recently, papermills and contract cheating firms have challenged the sector to detect the authenticity of work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusion

    Over time, the possibilities for ChatGPT in higher education will continue to grow alongside the challenges of embedding the tool.

    “We suspect that over time, these will continue to grow alongside the challenges of embedding a tool that provides much of the conventional answers to some instructional models of teaching theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Academic Editors

    Academic stress is positively linked with cheating behaviour and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism.

    “Research has found that academic stress is positively linked with cheating behaviour (Ma et al., 2013) and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism (Ehrich et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ma et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ehrich et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT

    Effective measures of detection and prescription of significant punishment have been proposed as a solution to cheating.

    “And for some, effective measures of detection, and prescription of significant punishment has been the proposed solution”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Amigud & Dawson, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dawson et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid

    From a set of brief ideas, students can generate text in which they have more confidence and check that text with their institutional tutor as a form of 'soft help'.

    “From a set of brief ideas, students can generate text in which they have more confidence, and check that text with their institutional tutor as a form of 'soft help'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § ChatGPT as the potential to create better flow

    In the contemporary learning context, opportunities arise that may enable ChatGPT-3 to be used for creating essay plans, completing grammar checking, or generating suggestions for key content curation and missing information.

    “In the contemporary learning context, opportunities arise that may enable ChatGPT-3 to be used for creating essay plans, completing grammar checking, or generating suggestions for key content curation, and missing information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    ChatGPT has the potential to provide students with a sense of control and psychological autonomy by giving them control over their writing.

    “ChatGPT has the potential to provide students with a sense of control and psychological autonomy needs by providing them with a sense of control over their writing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needs

    ChatGPT-3 has the propensity to support students meeting their basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, facilitating self-determination and bolstering academic motivation and performance.

    “ChatGPT-3, we posit, also has the propensity to support students meeting their basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness to facilitate self-determination and bolster academic motivation and performance (Geary et al., 2023Ryan & Deci, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Geary et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ryan & Deci, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

71 of 71
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ChatGPT can create new and innovative authentic assessment in higher education.

    “ChatGPT can create new and innovative authentic assessment in higher education.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.

    “Although, in the context of blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68 percent of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86 percent of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ChatGPT was introduced publicly from November 2022, with a stable release from February 2023.

    “the ChatGPT AI being introduced publicly from November 2022, and a stable release from February 2023.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ChatGPT-3 was released in November 2022 without significant warning and has taken higher education by storm.

    “The OpenAI's ChatGPT-3, or Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer was released in November 2022 without significant warning, and has taken higher education by storm since.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Students will build the capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct.

    “Assuming they build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many scholars have presented arguments against ChatGPT's utility in classrooms, citing plagiarism, authentication, and academic integrity as key concerns.

    “Many scholars to date have presented arguments against the tool's utility in classrooms, citing plagiarism, authentication, and academic integrity as key concerns.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recommendations for embedding AI in educational frameworks underscore the critical balance between leveraging technological advances and safeguarding academic integrity, creativity, and ethical standards.

    “The recommendations for embedding AI in educational frameworks underscore the critical balance between leveraging technological advances and safeguarding academic integrity, creativity, and ethical standards (Crawford et al., 2023a;Gimpel et al., 2023;Mills, 2023).”

    From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Crawford et al., 2023a

    The Conclusion recommends embedding ChatGPT in subjects and courses to teach ethical use while acknowledging plagiarism and academic-integrity concerns. This supports balancing AI’s educational benefits with integrity and ethics, but the paper does not specifically recommend safeguarding students’ creativity. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ChatGPT has been highlighted for fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation and enhancing teaching practices.

    “foster students’ performance, engagement and motivation [14, 44, 58], and enhance teaching practices [17, 18, 64, 74].”
  • Fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation leads to increased students' academic success.

    “fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation, leading to increase students' academic success [14, 44, 58]”
  • Previous studies indicate the importance of rethinking, improving, and redesigning innovative assessment methods in the era of chatbots.

    “The findings from previous studies indicate the importance of rethinking, improving, and redesigning innovative assessment methods in the era of chatbots [14, 20, 64, 75]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Same article listed with different first authors

    Minor

    References 10 and 65 give the same title, journal, volume, issue, year, and pages, but disagree about the article's first author and author order.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Published
2023-04-02
Volume
20
Issue
3
ISSN
1449-9789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323536358
Cited by
547
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 102
FWCI
128.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, generative AI in higher education, academic integrity, plagiarism, character development, educational leadership, authentic assessment, student learning, AI chatbots, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review