Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI)
Open accessAbstract
The OpenAI’s ChatGPT-3, or Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer was released in November 2022 without significant warning, and has taken higher education by storm since. The artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot has caused alarm for practitioners seeking to detect authenticity of student work. Whereas some educational doomsayers predict the end of education in its current form, we propose an alternate early view. We identify in this commentary a position where educators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character. Such students know how to use ChatGPT for good, and can engage effectively with the ChatGPT application. In building our ChatGPT argument, we acknowledge the existing literature on plagiarism and academic integrity, and consider leadership as a root support mechanism, character development as an antidote, and authentic assessment as an enabler. In doing so, we highlight that while ChatGPT – like papermills, and degree factories before it – can be used to cheat on university exams, it can also be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students. In doing so, we offer a commentary that offers opportunities for practitioners, and research potential for scholars.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This commentary argues that higher education should respond to ChatGPT not only with detection or bans, but with teacher leadership, character development, and authentic assessment to support ethical and deeper learning. It proposes that ChatGPT can support flow, basic psychological needs, and formative feedback, while acknowledging risks of plagiarism and overreliance.
Key findings
- The authors argue that effective teacher leadership and character development are needed so students use ChatGPT “for good, rather than for personal benefit,” rather than relying solely on detection or punishment.
- They propose ChatGPT can support positive learning outcomes by reducing cognitive load and enabling flow, supporting autonomy, competence, and relatedness, and providing 24/7 formative feedback and confidence-building.
- They argue ChatGPT can enable authentic assessment—for example, applying theory to complex cases, storyboards, or podcasts—rather than assessments that ask students to regurgitate textbook content.
- The paper cites contextual numbers: ChatGPT reached 100 million users in less than 2 months; student cheating admissions rose from 3% in 1963 to 64% in 2015; human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT-generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts; and one professor reported 14 of 163 students caught using ChatGPT to cheat.
Methods
- Design: a commentary/position paper guided by the research question, “What are the opportunities of ChatGPT in higher education practice?”
- Data or sample: no empirical sample; the authors draw on existing literature and on ChatGPT-generated responses to prompts, which are quoted as indented italicised paragraphs.
- Main analysis: conceptual argument organised around four opportunities—character-based leadership, flow, basic psychological needs, and ChatGPT as student assistant—plus discussion of authentic assessment.
Limitations
- The paper states that it offers an “early view” and that peer-reviewed literature on ChatGPT is limited, with few quality studies in top-tier journals at the time.
- The paper acknowledges that ChatGPT outputs are not actually ChatGPT’s opinion but “a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update,” and that the veracity of its output should always be questioned.
- Evident from the text: this is a commentary without empirical data, sample, or systematic analysis; its claims about benefits rely on author propositions and ChatGPT self-assessment rather than tested outcomes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Conclusion
When asked to apply authentic leadership theory to Apple, ChatGPT provided a reasonable response connecting the theory to elements of Apple's CEO and business practices.
“If the tool is asked to apply a particular theory to a particular organisation (our test prompt was 'Does authentic leadership apply to Apple?' and ChatGPT provided a reasonable response that connected the theory to elements of Apple's CEO and business practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusion
When asked to determine and defend the 'best' leadership style for Apple if it were post losses, ChatGPT's response was less definitive.
“When asking ChatGPT to determine and defend the 'best' leadership style for Apple if it were post losses, the AI chatbot's response was less definitive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT
A multipronged response that includes character development and detection is more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription.
“The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LaMontagne et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT
In these scenarios it was the leadership of teachers that influenced the extent to which students would engage in effective or ineffective learning.
“In these scenarios it was the leadership of teachers that influenced the extent to which students would engage in effective or ineffective (e.g., cheating) learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crawford, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The good and the bad of AI ChatGPT
A doctoral candidate with minimal training in grading papers or integrity-detection may have considerable challenge in identifying when students use the AI tool to cheat.
“This indicates, from a practical perspective, that a doctoral candidate with minimal training in grading papers or integrity-detection may have considerable challenge in identifying when students use the AI tool to cheat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.
- Premisecitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPT
Mental health scholars have known for some time that multipronged responses are more effective.
“a fact that mental health scholars have known for some time”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LaMontagne et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid
Chatbots are helping students succeed.
“and it is helping them succeed (Chen et al., 2023)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aid
Students are presenting an acceptance of chatbots.
“While students are presenting an acceptance of chatbots (Ragheb et al., 2021)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ragheb et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 66
- May combine two claims. 21
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowWriting is a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments.
“Writing is already a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lea & Street, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Concerns with artificial intelligenceChatGPT offers better student autonomy and wellbeing for learners.
“Third, ChatGPT we argue, offers better student autonomy and wellbeing for learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Introduction Rising stress and anxiety in university studentsStudents who experience high stress are particularly susceptible to engaging in plagiarism or the misuse of AI technology.
“Students who experience high stress are particularly susceptible to engaging in plagiarism or the misuse of AI technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractEffective teacher leadership is needed to develop student character so they use ChatGPT for good, rather than for personal benefit.
“We argue that effective teacher leadership is needed to develop student character so they use ChatGPT for good, rather than for personal benefit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractChatGPT can be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students.
“we highlight that while ChatGPT -like papermills, and degree factories before it -can be used to cheat on university exams, it can also be used to support deeper learning and better learning outcomes for students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowIt is possible ChatGPT could support facilitation of a flow state.
“It is possible it could support facilitation of a flow state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTTo combat prospective cheating or misuse of ChatGPT, cultivating a sense of moral character in students is an imperative.
“It is our proposition therefore that to combat prospective cheating or misuse of the ChatGPT application, and future artificial intelligence chatbots and tools, by cultivating a sense of moral character in students as an imperative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Academic EditorsIt may be that students who feel academic pressure are prone to using AI to complete assignments and AI technology may be one way some students cope with stress.
“It may be that students who feel academic pressure are prone to using AI to complete assignments and AI technology may be one way some students cope with stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Concerns with artificial intelligenceRemoving the noise from their studies supports deeper learning and flow states.
“Second, remove the noise from their studies to support deeper learning and flow states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTThe future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection.
“The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The good and the bad of AI ChatGPTThere are risks to overreliance on ChatGPT.
“So, there are risks to overreliance, and it could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ AbstractEducators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character.
“We identify in this commentary a position where educators can leverage AI like ChatGPT to build supportive learning environments for students who have cultivated good character.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractLeadership is a root support mechanism, character development an antidote, and authentic assessment an enabler for responding to ChatGPT in higher education.
“we acknowledge the existing literature on plagiarism and academic integrity, and consider leadership as a root support mechanism, character development as an antidote, and authentic assessment as an enabler.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTEffective leadership opportunities embedded into core curriculum may pose a possible antidote to future convenience that students might be afforded by difficult-to-detect cheating practices.
“For this, effective leadership opportunities embedded into core curriculum may pose a possible antidote to whatever future convenience that students might be afforded by difficult-todetect cheating practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Concerns with artificial intelligenceCharacter-based leadership development will support a response to the fear of cheating, not purely detection.
“First, we argue that it is character-based leadership development that will support a response to the fear of cheating, not purely detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTUndetected cheating could lead to future character erosion.
“The future-focused promotion of good practice and character development does not forego the need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The good and the bad of AI ChatGPTChatGPT could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.
“So, there are risks to overreliance, and it could provide useful opportunities for students to engage more deeply in learning practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ AbstractChatGPT offers students the opportunity to simplify the learning process to create less distraction, and more flow.
“ChatGPT offers students the opportunity to simplify the learning process to create less distraction, and more flow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionThe use of ChatGPT requires a change in the way students are assessed.
“The use of the tool requires a change in the way students are assessed, however.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionFor many universities, a fear-based ban response is an example of exercising fear in the advent of new tools that challenge us.
“And, for many universities, a fear-based ban response is an example of this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsChatGPT-3 provides real-time, 24/7 support for feedback, help, and suggestions.
“Real-time, 24/7 support is available for feedback, help, and suggestions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowSuch a focus may enable students to inquire more deeply into their content and material and engage in deeper forms of learning.
“Such a focus may enable students to inquire about their content and material more deeply, and indeed engage in deeper forms of learning (e.g., Archer-Kuhn, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Archer-Kuhn, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionAI provides an alternative pathway to learning.
“It does, however, provide an alternative pathway to learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidThe veracity of ChatGPT output should always be questioned.
“The way that ChatGPT works means that whilst it will produce output, the veracity of this output should always be questioned”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.ChatGPT does not actually understand what it's saying.
“Intriguingly, this means that ChatGPT does not actually understand what it's saying”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Academic EditorsThe percentage of students who admit to cheating has increased significantly in recent years; in 1963 only 3% admitted cheating on exams, while in 2015 that number had risen to 64%.
“In 1963, for instance, only 3 percent of students admitted to cheating on exams, while in 2015, that number had risen to 64 percent and some studies identify higher rates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McCabe et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wright, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTThe issue of students cheating on their assignments is not new practice.
“The issue of students cheating on their assignments is not new practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsIn a context where increasing numbers of university students feel lonely and isolated, ChatGPT-3 could fill a part of this void.
“In a context where increasing numbers of university students feel lonely and isolated (Thomas et al., 2020), ChatGPT-3 could fill a part of this void.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thomas et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionStudents can still have ChatGPT supplement their language or provide tips on making a podcast, but it does not purely replace the student creating the podcast.
“While the students can still have ChatGPT supplement their language, or provide tips on making a podcast, it does not purely replace the student creating the podcast; an assessment-for-learning activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionThere is opportunity to consider assessment that is less traditional, such as drawing a storyboard for a process-related assessment, or making a podcast about a core topic.
“Likewise, there is also opportunity to consider assessment that is less traditional, such as drawing a storyboard for a process-related assessment, or making a podcast about a core topic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidWhile ChatGPT data may generally be correct and it can support higher volume scholarly work, it still needs a critical reader.
“That is, while the data may generally be correct, and it can support higher volume scholarly work (Liebrenz et al., 2023), it still needs a critical reader in its work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liebrenz et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidUsing ChatGPT to produce a summative result is rife with risk.
“In this way, using ChatGPT to produce a summative result is rife with risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ The artificial intelligence historyThe progression of AI has grown and accelerated, with LLM AIs like ChatGPT creating radical change in the way people do, be, and learn.
“Indeed, the progression of artificial intelligence has grown and accelerated in the past years, with the LLM AIslike ChatGPTcreating radical change in the way people do, be, and learn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTMoral disengagement and motivated forgetting of bad decisions are two key mechanisms by which students can feel comfortable with cheating.
“Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided, two key mechanisms by which students can feel comfortable with cheating”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shu et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsChatGPT-3 places autonomy in the hands of the student.
“ChatGPT-3 places autonomy in the hands of the student.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowWith the right assessment and curriculum design, ChatGPT could enable students to be more critical in their learning rather than anxious about lacking references or misplaced commas.
“This opportunity, with the right assessment and curriculum design, could enable students to be more critical in their learning, rather than anxious that they have a lack of references, or that commas are in the wrong place (Gravett & Kinchin, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gravett & Kinchin, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidChatGPT itself suggests a mechanism by which the tool might be used to improve quality of submission for students.
“Instead, ChatGPT itself suggests a mechanism that the tool might be used to improve quality of submission for students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.ChatGPT generates its output based on the prompt, using a pre-trained model built from a large corpus of data scraped from the internet.
“ChatGPT generates its output based on the prompt, using a pre-trained model that has been built from a large corpus of data (big data) that ChatGPT has scraped the internet for.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidAssuming students build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure the final output is correct, this has the potential to produce a more useful result reflecting the students' ideas and approach while allowing them to express themselves as a form of 'transition pedagogy'.
“Assuming they build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct, this has the potential to produce a more useful result, reflecting the students' ideas and approach, but allowing them to express themselves as a form of 'transition pedagogy'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Students will build the capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionChatGPT can help students identify areas they have missed, provide light guidance on where they might read more, and foster a sense of connection to supplement existing peer and teacher connections.
“It can help students to identify areas they have missed, provide light guidance on where they might read more, and foster a sense of connection (albeit human-robot connection) to supplement existing peer and teacher connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionAuthentic assessment questions where the answers are multiple will enable students to learn with the aid of ChatGPT, but not exclusively with it.
“It is likely in these sorts of authentic assessment questionswhere the answers are multiplethat will enable students to learn with the aid of ChatGPT, but not exclusively with it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidChatGPT's output is not actually its own opinion but a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update.
“While this bullish answer would perhaps be expected from a machine being asked to evaluate itself, it is worthwhile remembering that this is not actually ChatGPT's opinion, but a confluence of societal opinion from its last knowledge update.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTThese systems and practice have still plagued higher education.
“Yet, these systems and practice have still plagued higher education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTThis may be through effective teacher role modelling, through leadership development opportunities, or through continuous self-awareness, ethics, and decision-making training to build critical thinkers with a firm moral compass.
“This may be through effective teacher role modelling, through leadership development opportunities, or through continuous self-awareness, ethics, and decision-making training to build critical thinkers with a firm moral compass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsChatGPT-3 may support students by bolstering their feelings of competence by equipping them with the skills and resources needed for a set writing task.
“ChatGPT-3 may also support students by bolstering their feelings of competence by equipping them with the skills and resources needed for a set writing task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsThere may be space for ChatGPT-3 to foster relatedness for university students.
“There may be space for ChatGPT-3 to foster relatedness for university students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionEarly assessment could receive feedback from ChatGPT, with the quality of the student prompts assessable.
“Early assessment could receive feedback from ChatGPT, with the quality of the student prompts assessable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT being asked to critique a mock student reflection.Asking ChatGPT to challenge the assumptions made in a student reflection may support elevated self-awareness and more critical thinking.
“This activity may support elevated self-awareness and more critical thinking (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ ConclusionChatGPT can be encouraged in the same way software tools like Grammarly can be used to support learning.
“Instead, and perhaps unlike papermills, ChatGPT can be encouraged in the same way software tools like Grammarly can be used to support learning (Thi & Nikolov, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thi & Nikolov, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidMany students are still developing their capacity for critical thinking.
“it is likely many students are still developing their capacity for critical thinking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidChatGPT is likely to entrench existing views of the world rather than what the world ought to be.
“it is likely to entrench existing views of the world rather than what the world ought to be.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionBy embedding AI like ChatGPT into subjects and courses, we might be able to teach students ethical use of such devices.
“That is, by embedding AI like ChatGPT into subjects and courses, we might be able to teach students ethical use of such devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ The advent of ChatGPTChatGPT reached 100 million users in less than 2 months.
“with an oft-quoted statistic that ChatGPT was able to reach 100 million users in less than 2 months”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hu, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidWithout an evaluation step conducted by somebody with expertise, the output of ChatGPT remains underutilised.
“ChatGPT quite rightly acknowledges that without an evaluation step conducted by somebody with expertise, the output of the tool remains underutilised.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowThe use of an AI tool like ChatGPT could free students from the demand for cognitive resources to reach a state of flow and become fully immersed in the task.
“To support students to be more immersed in their learning, it is possible that the use of an AI toollike ChatGPTcould free students from the demand for cognitive resources to reach a state of flow and become fully immersed in the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ I was made to provide natural language processing and generate human-like responses to facilitate communication between humans and machines.ChatGPT has created a significant level of concern in the higher education sector.
“it is in producing this that ChatGPT has created a significant level of concern in the higher education sector.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionWhile AI can help students learn, it does not substitute learning.
“While AI can help students learn, it does not substitute learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidBy requiring students to carefully construct prompts and evaluate results, potentially with a tutor providing formative feedback, ChatGPT can be used to support students and build their confidence.
“By requiring students to carefully construct their prompts and evaluate their results, potentially in the presence of a tutor in the form of formative feedback, ChatGPT can be used to support students and build their confidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTSuch development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided.
“Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThe ChatGPT software tool has raised significant questions for the future of higher education.
“The ChatGPT software tool has raised significant questions for the future of higher education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ ChatGPT being asked to critique a mock student reflection.ChatGPT and similar AI chatbots provide an opportunity for students to seek feedback on their assignments and to have their beliefs questioned and challenged.
“In the realm of assessment ChatGPT, and similar AI chatbots, provide an opportunity for students to seek feedback on their assignments, and to have their beliefs questioned and challenged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidBy dissecting ChatGPT output, students can leverage the tool to support and improve quality of submission.
“And in dissecting the ChatGPT output, students can begin to leverage the tool to support and improve quality of submission, in line with the original ideals of AI first espoused back in the 1950s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsThe emergent literature contains an implied assumption that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them.
“There is an implied assumption in the emergent literature that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them (e.g., Pavlik, 2023;Perkins, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pavlik, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Perkins, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTPapermills and contract cheating firms have challenged the sector to detect the authenticity of work.
“More recently, papermills and contract cheating firms have challenged the sector to detect the authenticity of work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionOver time, the possibilities for ChatGPT in higher education will continue to grow alongside the challenges of embedding the tool.
“We suspect that over time, these will continue to grow alongside the challenges of embedding a tool that provides much of the conventional answers to some instructional models of teaching theory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Academic EditorsAcademic stress is positively linked with cheating behaviour and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism.
“Research has found that academic stress is positively linked with cheating behaviour (Ma et al., 2013) and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism (Ehrich et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ma et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ehrich et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ The need for good leadership in teaching ChatGPTEffective measures of detection and prescription of significant punishment have been proposed as a solution to cheating.
“And for some, effective measures of detection, and prescription of significant punishment has been the proposed solution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Amigud & Dawson, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dawson et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the student assistant, rather than the cheating aidFrom a set of brief ideas, students can generate text in which they have more confidence and check that text with their institutional tutor as a form of 'soft help'.
“From a set of brief ideas, students can generate text in which they have more confidence, and check that text with their institutional tutor as a form of 'soft help'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ChatGPT as the potential to create better flowIn the contemporary learning context, opportunities arise that may enable ChatGPT-3 to be used for creating essay plans, completing grammar checking, or generating suggestions for key content curation and missing information.
“In the contemporary learning context, opportunities arise that may enable ChatGPT-3 to be used for creating essay plans, completing grammar checking, or generating suggestions for key content curation, and missing information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsChatGPT has the potential to provide students with a sense of control and psychological autonomy by giving them control over their writing.
“ChatGPT has the potential to provide students with a sense of control and psychological autonomy needs by providing them with a sense of control over their writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ ChatGPT as the potential to support student's basic psychological needsChatGPT-3 has the propensity to support students meeting their basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, facilitating self-determination and bolstering academic motivation and performance.
“ChatGPT-3, we posit, also has the propensity to support students meeting their basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness to facilitate self-determination and bolster academic motivation and performance (Geary et al., 2023Ryan & Deci, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Geary et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ryan & Deci, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
ChatGPT can create new and innovative authentic assessment in higher education.
“ChatGPT can create new and innovative authentic assessment in higher education.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68% of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86% of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.
“Although, in the context of blind studies, human reviewers correctly identified 68 percent of ChatGPT generated abstracts and 86 percent of genuine abstracts, but incorrectly identified the rest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ChatGPT was introduced publicly from November 2022, with a stable release from February 2023.
“the ChatGPT AI being introduced publicly from November 2022, and a stable release from February 2023.”
The paper relies on this without support.
ChatGPT-3 was released in November 2022 without significant warning and has taken higher education by storm.
“The OpenAI's ChatGPT-3, or Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer was released in November 2022 without significant warning, and has taken higher education by storm since.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Students will build the capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct.
“Assuming they build capacity to evaluate the value of the text and ensure that the final output is correct”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many scholars have presented arguments against ChatGPT's utility in classrooms, citing plagiarism, authentication, and academic integrity as key concerns.
“Many scholars to date have presented arguments against the tool's utility in classrooms, citing plagiarism, authentication, and academic integrity as key concerns.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recommendations for embedding AI in educational frameworks underscore the critical balance between leveraging technological advances and safeguarding academic integrity, creativity, and ethical standards.
“The recommendations for embedding AI in educational frameworks underscore the critical balance between leveraging technological advances and safeguarding academic integrity, creativity, and ethical standards (Crawford et al., 2023a;Gimpel et al., 2023;Mills, 2023).”
From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Crawford et al., 2023a
The Conclusion recommends embedding ChatGPT in subjects and courses to teach ethical use while acknowledging plagiarism and academic-integrity concerns. This supports balancing AI’s educational benefits with integrity and ethics, but the paper does not specifically recommend safeguarding students’ creativity. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredChatGPT has been highlighted for fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation and enhancing teaching practices.
“foster students’ performance, engagement and motivation [14, 44, 58], and enhance teaching practices [17, 18, 64, 74].”
From A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation leads to increased students' academic success.
“fostering students' performance, engagement, and motivation, leading to increase students' academic success [14, 44, 58]”
From A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Previous studies indicate the importance of rethinking, improving, and redesigning innovative assessment methods in the era of chatbots.
“The findings from previous studies indicate the importance of rethinking, improving, and redesigning innovative assessment methods in the era of chatbots [14, 20, 64, 75]”
From A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Same article listed with different first authors
MinorReferences 10 and 65 give the same title, journal, volume, issue, year, and pages, but disagree about the article's first author and author order.
“10. Bockting, C. L., van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W. & van Rooij, R. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.”
“65. van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.”
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: A survey
Abiodun, O. I., Jantan, A., Omolara, A. E., Dada, K. V., Mohamed, N. A., & Arshad, H. (2018) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 · Cited by 3,063 · see citing works
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Writing is already a complex activity but paired with deadlines, other academic pressures and stress, students undertake a substantial cognitive load when completing written-based assignments (Lea & Street, 1998).”
BackgroundThe prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students
Beiter, R., Nash, R., McCrady, M., Rhoades, D., Linscomb, M., Clarahan, M., & Sammut, S. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054 · Cited by 2,030 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Research shows that social and peer pressure (Beiter et al., 2015), academic work (Alghamdi et al., 2019), financial concerns (Beiter et al., 2015), academic pressure (Reddy et al., 2018), and balancing other responsibilities like work and family (von Keyserlingk et al., 2022) are significant…”
BackgroundThe forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms
Makridakis, S. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006 · Cited by 1,866 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2021), building targeted marketing campaigns and using their understanding of both individuals and groups to tailor their content (Makridakis, 2017).”
BackgroundChatGPT: five priorities for research
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 1× · see citing works
“And these four proposed below also go beyond technology- and authentication-centric strategies proposed by van Dis et al. (2023).”
BackgroundChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These studies, with considerable brevity, highlight a position on ChatGPT, including Editor-inChief of Science, Holden Thorp (2023), which indicates “Machines play an important role, but as tools for the people posing the hypotheses... and making sense of the results”, or put more simply, it is not an author on a pape…”
BackgroundA Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/8812542 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education
Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823 · Cited by 1,359 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Stress has substantial implications resulting in often adverse effects on students' academic performance, a concern given that it is also widely reported that University students face significant psychosocial challenges during their studies (Deng et al., 2022; Pascoe et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMental health problems in college freshmen: Prevalence and academic functioning
Bruffaerts, R., Mortier, P., Kiekens, G., Auerbach, R. P., Cuijpers, P., Demyttenaere, K., Green, J. G., Nock, M. K., & Kessler, R. C. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044 · Cited by 1,047 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Rising stress and anxiety in university students A growing body of research suggests that contemporary university students are vulnerable to stress and mental health issues (Bruffaerts et al., 2018; Prowse et al., 2021; Shaffique et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPavlik, J. V. (2023) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/10776958221149577 · Cited by 972 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an implied assumption in the emergent literature that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them (e.g., Pavlik, 2023; Perkins, 2023).”
BackgroundMarginson, S. (2016) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x · Cited by 870 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the 70s, social shifts have dramatically increased living costs, educational costs, and competition for further learning and finding work post-degree (Marginson, 2016; Perrone & Vickers, 2003).”
BackgroundChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z · Cited by 868 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is not a consensus perspective though, with at least four studies to date citing ChatGPT as a co-author (see Stokel-Walker, 2023).”
BackgroundPerkins, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07 · Cited by 839 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is an implied assumption in the emergent literature that students will use ChatGPT-3 to write assignments for them (e.g., Pavlik, 2023; Perkins, 2023).”
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4 · Cited by 685 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2021), and it is helping them succeed (Chen et al., 2023), it is likely to entrench existing views of the world rather than what the world ought to be.”
BackgroundShu, L. L., Francesca Gino, B., & Bazerman, M. H. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211398138 · Cited by 671 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such development is critical if moral disengagement and patterns of motivated forgetting of bad decisions is to be avoided, two key mechanisms by which students can feel comfortable with cheating (Shu et al., 2011).”
BackgroundAbstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Else, H. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00019-5 · Cited by 594 · cited 1× · see citing works
“That is, while the data may generally be correct, and it can support higher volume scholarly work (Liebrenz et al., 2023), it still needs a critical reader in its work.”
BackgroundThe Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · Cited by 540 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the broad area of data warehousing and data analytics was quickly adopted by both Google and others to truly understand their customer base (Gregory et al., 2021), building targeted marketing campaigns and using their understanding of both individuals and groups to tailor their content…”
BackgroundWorkplace mental health: developing an integrated intervention approach
LaMontagne, A. D., Martin, A. J., Page, K. M., Reavley, N. J., Noblet, A. J., Milner, A. J., Keegel, T. G., & Smith, P. M. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-131 · Cited by 516 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…need for detection, as undetected cheating could lead to future character erosion, but rather offers a multipronged response that serves as more effective than only focusing on prevention or prescription; a fact that mental health scholars have known for some time (e.g., LaMontagne et al., 2014).”
BackgroundAcademic Stress and its Sources Among University Students
Reddy, K. J., Menon, K. R., & Thattil, A. (2018) · Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal · doi:10.13005/bpj/1404 · Cited by 484 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…that social and peer pressure (Beiter et al., 2015), academic work (Alghamdi et al., 2019), financial concerns (Beiter et al., 2015), academic pressure (Reddy et al., 2018), and balancing other responsibilities like work and family (von Keyserlingk et al., 2022) are significant sources of stress.”
BackgroundProwse, R., Sherratt, F., Abizaid, A. B., Gabrys, R. L., Hellemans, K. G. C., Patterson, Z. R., & McQuaid, R. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650759 · Cited by 456 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rising stress and anxiety in university students A growing body of research suggests that contemporary university students are vulnerable to stress and mental health issues (Bruffaerts et al., 2018; Prowse et al., 2021; Shaffique et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPsychological Wellbeing and Academic Experience of University Students in Australia during COVID-19
Dodd, R. H., Dadaczynski, K., Okan, O., McCaffery, K. J., & Pickles, K. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18030866 · Cited by 395 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Many students report lower levels of wellbeing and increased academic-related stress due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Dodd et al., 2021; von Keyserlingk et al., 2022) In the years that have followed, a similar pattern of statistics emerges that is too significant to ignore – student stress and mental…”
BackgroundGenerality in artificial intelligence
McCarthy, J. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/33447.33448 · Cited by 391 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It was in the 1950s that McCarthy first proposed the idea that machines could be intelligent (see McCarthy et al., 1955, McCarthy, 1987).”
BackgroundWork strain, health, and absenteeism: A meta-analysis.
Darr, W., & Johns, G. (2008) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012639 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Family and Academic Stress and Their Impact on Students' Depression Level and Academic Performance
Deng, Y., Cherian, J., Khan, N. U. N., Kumari, K., Sial, M. S., Comite, U., Gavurova, B., & Popp, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337 · Cited by 371 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Stress has substantial implications resulting in often adverse effects on students' academic performance, a concern given that it is also widely reported that University students face significant psychosocial challenges during their studies (Deng et al., 2022; Pascoe et al., 2020).”
BackgroundFerrucci, D., Levas, A., Bagchi, S., Gondek, D., & Mueller, E. T. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.009 · Cited by 351 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It started with an evolution on the toy problems, with machines learning to play chess so that they could beat the Grand Champions, or to compete in Jeopardy! and score higher than the most skilled human players (Ferrucci et al., 2013; Hassabis, 2017).”
BackgroundNewton, P. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00067 · Cited by 289 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While once contract cheating was considered a concern to those students who could afford it (Newton, 2018), from 2023 onwards, scholars are already worried about the effects that new AI and large language models (LLMs) will have on academic integrity issues for universities.”
BackgroundLyons, Z., Wilcox, H. M., Leung, L., & Dearsley, O. (2020) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856220947945 · Cited by 277 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has been widely reported that the global pandemic significantly impacted students' mental health, with the most impact on social relationships, learning and stress levels among Australian university students (Lyons et al., 2020; Vernon et al., 2022).”
BackgroundHamzaçebi, Ç., Akay, D., & Kutay, F. (2008) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.042 · Cited by 240 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Starting with Neural Networks, society found themselves able to build machines that could forecast results and predict outcomes (Hamzaçebi et al., 2009), often with more precision than a human being.”
BackgroundButler-Henderson, K., & Crawford, J. (2020) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104024 · Cited by 230 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One of the major challenges of online examinations, for example, was the ability to authenticate the student who did the exam using software like retina and keystroke monitoring (Butler-Henderson & Crawford, 2020).”
MethodSelf-citationAdams, D. R., Meyers, S. A., & Beidas, R. S. (2016) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1154559 · Cited by 200 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Financial concerns are one of the leading sources of stress for university students (Adams et al., 2016; Beiter et al., 2015), with pressure to do well, graduate, and be employable a consistent pressure.”
BackgroundStudent Loneliness: The Role of Social Media Through Life Transitions
Thomas, L., Orme, E., & Kerrigan, F. (2020) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103754 · Cited by 199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a context where increasing numbers of university students feel lonely and isolated (Thomas et al., 2020), ChatGPT-3 could fill a part of this void.”
BackgroundStress of university students before and after campus closure in response to COVID‐19
von Keyserlingk, L., Yamaguchi‐Pedroza, K., Arum, R., & Eccles, J. S. (2021) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.22561 · Cited by 161 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…that social and peer pressure (Beiter et al., 2015), academic work (Alghamdi et al., 2019), financial concerns (Beiter et al., 2015), academic pressure (Reddy et al., 2018), and balancing other responsibilities like work and family (von Keyserlingk et al., 2022) are significant sources of stress.”
BackgroundLife after graduation as a “very uncomfortable world”: an Australian case study
Perrone, L., & Vickers, M. H. (2003) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/00400910310464044 · Cited by 151 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the 70s, social shifts have dramatically increased living costs, educational costs, and competition for further learning and finding work post-degree (Marginson, 2016; Perrone & Vickers, 2003).”
BackgroundComputational Creativity and Music Generation Systems: An Introduction to the State of the Art
Carnovalini, F., & Rodà, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00014 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students
Jereb, E., Perc, M., Lämmlein, B., Jerebic, J., Urh, M., Podbregar, I., & Šprajc, P. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202252 · Cited by 141 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…increase in plagiarism and academic misconduct are complex and multifaceted, some researchers have suggested that the increased pressure on students to succeed academically, paired with the availability of technology, makes academic breaches far easier (Jereb et al., 2018; Surahman & Wang, 2022).”
BackgroundAcademic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review
Surahman, E., & Wang, T. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12708 · Cited by 140 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…increase in plagiarism and academic misconduct are complex and multifaceted, some researchers have suggested that the increased pressure on students to succeed academically, paired with the availability of technology, makes academic breaches far easier (Jereb et al., 2018; Surahman & Wang, 2022).”
BackgroundSweeping dishonesty under the rug: How unethical actions lead to forgetting of moral rules.
Shu, L. L., & Francesca Gino, B. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028381 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism
Ehrich, J. F., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927850 · Cited by 134 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2013) and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism (Ehrich et al., 2016).”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence: Chess match of the century
Hassabis, D. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/544413a · Cited by 105 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It started with an evolution on the toy problems, with machines learning to play chess so that they could beat the Grand Champions, or to compete in Jeopardy! and score higher than the most skilled human players (Ferrucci et al., 2013; Hassabis, 2017).”
BackgroundMa, Y., McCabe, D. L., & Liu, R. (2013) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-013-9186-7 · Cited by 87 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Research has found that academic stress is positively linked with cheating behaviour (Ma et al., 2013) and students who are more likely to engage in plagiarism (Ehrich et al.”
BackgroundRagheb, M. A., Tantawi, P. I., Khourshed, N. F., & Hatata, A. Y. (2022) · International Journal of Higher Education Management · doi:10.24052/ijhem/v08n02/art-1 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
How Teacher and Grammarly Feedback Complement One Another in Myanmar EFL Students’ Writing
Thi, N. K., & Nikolov, M. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00625-2 · Cited by 77 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Instead, and perhaps unlike papermills, ChatGPT can be encouraged in the same way software tools like Grammarly can be used to support learning (Thi & Nikolov, 2022).”
MethodWork like a girl: Redressing gender inequity in academia through systemic solutions
Allen, K., Butler-Henderson, K. A., Reupert, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.3.3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCheating and Honor: Lessons from a Long-Term Research Project
McCabe, D. L. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_35 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Dawson, P., Sutherland-Smith, W., & Ricksen, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1662884 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“And for some, effective measures of detection, and prescription of significant punishment has been the proposed solution (Amigud & Dawson, 2019; Dawson et al., 2020).”
MethodCrawford (2023) · doi:10.53761/1.20.01.01 · Cited by 52 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…of https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol20/iss3/02 University Teaching and Learning Practice editorial, the Editor-in-Chief introduced publication sections that focused on good leadership and educational psychology to better understand and enhance how students engage with learning (Crawford, 2023).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem?
Amigud, A., & Dawson, P. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“And for some, effective measures of detection, and prescription of significant punishment has been the proposed solution (Amigud & Dawson, 2019; Dawson et al., 2020).”
MethodReferencing and empowerment: exploring barriers to agency in the higher education student experience
Gravett, K., & Kinchin, I. M. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1541883 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This opportunity, with the right assessment and curriculum design, could enable students to be more critical in their learning, rather than anxious that they have a lack of references, or that commas are in the wrong place (Gravett & Kinchin, 2020).”
BackgroundSources of Stress Among Undergraduate Nursing Students
Alghamdi, S., Aljabri, S., Jafari, G., Alzebali, R., Alkunaidiri, N., & Kalantan, N. (2019) · Global Journal of Health Science · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v11n9p116 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research shows that social and peer pressure (Beiter et al., 2015), academic work (Alghamdi et al., 2019), financial concerns (Beiter et al., 2015), academic pressure (Reddy et al., 2018), and balancing other responsibilities like work and family (von Keyserlingk et al., 2022) are significant…”
BackgroundCheating and Honor: Lessons from a Long-Term Research Project
McCabe, D. L. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_35-1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Among University Students
Shaffique, S., Farooq, S. S., Anwar, H., Asif, H. M., Akram, M., & Jung, S. K. (2020) · RADS Journal of Biological Research & Applied Sciences · doi:10.37962/jbas.v11i1.308 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Archer‐Kuhn, B., Wiedeman, D., & Chalifoux, J. (2020) · Journal of higher education outreach & engagement/Journal of higher education outreach and engagement. · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Geary, E., Allen, K., Gamble, N., & Pahlevansharif, S. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.01.13 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…basic psychological needs ChatGPT-3, we posit, also has the propensity to support students meeting their basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness to facilitate self-determination and bolster academic motivation and performance (Geary et al., 2023 Ryan & Deci, 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAddressing academic rejection: Recommendations for reform
Allen, K.-A., Dr, G. M. D., Dr, S. P., Professor, S. R. J., & Professor, J. A. C. H. (2020) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.17.5.19 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Time and resources of academic staff who already report they are at capacity for their workload, overloaded or stressed themselves – especially those from underserved populations (Allen et al., 2020; 2021).”
BackgroundConnor, M., Mueller, B., Mann, S., & Andrew, M. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.5.2 · Cited by 13 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The COVID-19 pandemic adds another layer of concern regarding student stress and anxiety.”
Wright, T. A. (2015) · Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- van Dis, E. A., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224-226.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ray, P. P. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · Cited by 2,463 · see citing works
Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1 · Cited by 1,043 · see citing works
“It can assist with homework questions, offering step-by-step solutions and guiding students through complex problems (Crawford et al., 2023; Fauzi et al., 2023; Lo, 2023; Qadir, 2023 Shidiq, 2023).”
BackgroundStrzelecki, A. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
“…in higher education, di ff erent areas can be discussed as software is producing fake citations (Cooper, 2023), developing assignments (Sullivan et al., 2023), supporting essay writing (Crawford et al., 2023), and encouraging critical re fl ection on AI ’ s use in society (van Dis et al., 2023).”
BackgroundBahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151712983 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
“Assessment designs should engage students with tasks that require critical thinking and cannot be easily replicated by LLMs (Crawford et al., 2023; Kuhn, 2019; Iordanou et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Scoping Review on How Generative Artificial Intelligence Transforms Assessment in Higher Education
Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z · Cited by 493 · see citing works
“Moreover, ChatGPT offers opportunities for authentic assessment by challenging students’ beliefs and critical thinking (Crawford et al., 2023; Currie et al., 2023; Geerling et al., 2023).”
Strzelecki, A. (2024) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
“Naumowa (2023) stresses critical thinking in using AI, whereas Hsu (2023), Ivanov and Soliman (2023), Lim et al. (2023), Crawford et al. (2023), Sullivan et al. (2023), and Cooper (2023), explore the ethical and practical implications, calling for ethical guidelines and theoretical frameworks.”
Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
“Finally, Crawford et al. (2023) argued that leadership is needed to ensure the ethical use of ChatGPT in education, with a particular focus on character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence.”
Background(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
“…improves student performance and motivation, and refines teaching practices, as evidenced in various recent publications (Alves de Castro, 2023; Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023; Day, 2023; Farrokhnia, Banihashem, Noroozi, & Wals, 2023; Lee, 2023; Rudolph, Tan, & Tan, 2023; Su & Yang, 2023).”
Prompting Higher Education Towards AI-Augmented Teaching and Learning Practice
Eager, B., & Brunton, R. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.5.02 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness
Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023) · Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research · doi:10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“However, most studies so far argue in favor of AI’s responsible use (Anderson et al., 2023; Carrasco et al., 2023; Crawford et al., 2023; Dwivedi et al., 2023; Kung et al., 2023; O’Connor, 2022; Sallam, 2023).”
BackgroundAl-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“Robust privacy measures in AI applications are emphasized, aligning with previous research fi ndings (André Renz, 2021; Crawford et al. 2023; Doncieux et al. 2022; Dignum, 2017; Seo et al. 2021; Zhang and Aslan, 2021).”
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
“ChatGPT has the potential to improve students’ learning outcomes by providing them with an interactive learning experience, where they can ask follow-up questions on a subject and gain in-depth knowledge (Crawford et al., 2023).”
BackgroundPerkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/q3azde36 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100022 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., A. Iahad, N., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Aldana Segura, M. W., AlHumaid, J., et al. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Strzelecki, A., & ElArabawy, S. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13425 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14060636 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Raghu Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., Sanjanasri, J. P., & Nedungadi, P. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/3085910 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
“This finding is supported by the previous studies high-lighting technical drawbacks of using chatbots (Crawford et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2022).”
Student Interaction with ChatGPT Can Promote Complex Critical Thinking Skills
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
La nueva realidad de la educación ante los avances de la inteligencia artificial generativa
García Peñalvo, F. J., Llorens-Largo, F., & Vidal, J. (2023) · RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.27.1.37716 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
“Comprehensive guidelines should outline the appropriate use of AI-generated content, citation requirements, and limitations (Crawford et al., 2023; Sullivan et al., 2023).”
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14010083 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“This proposition can provide a dynamic and interactive platform to foster knowledge acquisition and acknowledge the existing concerns on plagiarism and academic integrity [8,16].”
BackgroundKurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14050503 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education
Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“Ultimately, fostering students’ performance, engagement, and motivation, leading to increase students’ academic success [14, 44, 58].”
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive.
Alier, M., García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Camba, J. D. (2024) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“ChatGPT can offer feedback on writing, provide suggestions on organization, and help make arguments more compelling [71].”
BackgroundOpportunities, challenges and school strategies for integrating generative AI in education
Ng, D. T. K., Chan, E. K. C., & Lo, C. K. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., & Strampel, K. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.6.12 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“Studies to date reflect the need to rethink the typical types of university assessment tasks which could now easily be completed by GenAI tools (Cotton et al, 2023, Crawford et al 2023; Farrokhnia et al, 2023; Perkins 2023; Rudolph et al, 2023).”
Νικολοπούλου, Κ. (2024) · International Journal of Changes in Education · doi:10.47852/bonviewijce42022489 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“Concerns associated with academic integrity, cheating, and plagiarism have also been reported [6, 39].”
BackgroundDahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Vighio, M. S., Alblehai, F., Soomro, R. B., & Shutaleva, A. V. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“ChatGPT is gaining prominence in higher education, assisting students in tasks like generating citations and assignments (Crawford et al., 2023).”
Peláez‐Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman‐Morales, L. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“AI encourages more significant real-time learning, revised outcomes, and an appropriate knowledge setting when educational assessment progresses more swiftly than ever before [66,87].”
BackgroundNguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/caraaq92 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“…integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity that need to be thoughtfully examined and managed (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023; Holmes et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialAlneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13417 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
ChatGPT in higher education - a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda
Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“However, the most influential studies in terms of citations have been produced by the United States, Ger - many, Australia, and the United Kingdom.”
InfluentialBalalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Velásquez-Henao, J. D., Franco-Cardona, C. J., & Cadavid-Higuita, L. (2023) · DYNA · doi:10.15446/dyna.v90n230.111700 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
The Educational Affordances and Challenges of ChatGPT: State of the Field
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“Crawford et al. (2023) maintain that ChatGPT can provide students with a sense of control and psychological autonomy by providing them with more control over their learning.”
Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania
Rudolph, J., Mohamed Ismail, F. M., & Popenici, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/54fs5e77 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“The recommendations for embedding AI in educational frameworks underscore the critical balance between leveraging technological advances and safeguarding academic integrity, creativity, and ethical standards (Crawford et al., 2023a; Gimpel et al., 2023; Mills, 2023).”
BackgroundWill artificial intelligence drive the advancements in higher education? A tri-phased exploration
Kumar, S., Rao, P., Singhania, S., Verma, S., & Kheterpal, M. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123258 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model
Grassini, S., Aasen, M. L., & Møgelvang, A. (2024) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2024.2371168 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“These encompass aiding in essay writing (Crawford, Cowling, and Allen 2023) and offering personalized feed-back on student assignments and acting as coaches and teaching assistants to the students (Møgelvang et al. 2023), and facilitating critical conversations about AIs societal impact (Van Dis et…”
Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Using ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Literature Review
Sok, S., & Heng, K. (2024) · Journal of Digital Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/jdet/14027 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“As Crawford et al. (2023) noted, by giving students a sense of mastery over their writing assignments, ChatGPT has the ability to fulfill students ’ basic needs for psychological autonomy.”
BackgroundInfluentialStudents’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool: the case of the University of Jordan.
O. Ajlouni, A., Abd-Alkareem Wahba, F., & Salem Almahaireh, A. (2023) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v17i18.41753 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
(2023) · doi:10.1057/s41307-023-00323-2 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
“Therefore, it is crucial for educational institutions to establish comprehensive guidelines outlining the acceptable use of AI-generated content, and to emphasize the importance of attribution and academic integrity (Crawford et al. 2023; Sullivan et al. 2023).”
Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges
Creely, E. (2024) · International Journal of Changes in Education · doi:10.47852/bonviewijce42022495 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the establishment of a transparent evaluation system could substantiate the authenticity of work for assessment, effectively differentiating between creativity from students and AI-assisted production (Crawford et al., 2023).”
BackgroundHow understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2023) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ad1420 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“Some recurring ideas in this literature include the impact of LLMs on assessment practices on one side [52,82,83], as well as LLMs’ potential to enable interactive and personalised learning assistance for students [84,85], and lesson planning and assessment assistance for teachers [84–88].”
BackgroundWriting with AI: University Students’ Use of ChatGPT
Črček, N., & Patekar, J. (2023) · Journal of Language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2023.17379 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“Indeed, universities and instructors must lead the change (e.g., Cotton et al. 2023; Crawford et al., 2023; Currie, 2023; Sweeney, 2023; Vaccino-Salvadore, 2023) if they want to turn chaos into growth.”
BackgroundBobula, M. (2024) · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education · doi:10.47408/jldhe.vi30.1137 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Development and validation of ChatGPT literacy scale
Lee, S., & Park, G. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-05723-0 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“In the context of ChatGPT, experts have raised various ethical considerations, such as morality concerns, information bias, misinformation issues, academic integrity concerns, and privacy concerns (Chan, 2022; Crawford et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2022).”
Mastering knowledge: the impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes
Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“…implications of GenAI on academic integrity such as cheating and plagiarism (Cotton, Cotton, and Shipway 2023), and impacts on data privacy and security, such as personal identifiable information (Adiguzel, Kaya, and Cansu 2023; Crawford, Cowling, and Allen 2023; Lodge, Thompson, and Corrin 2023).”
AI in higher education: a systematic literature review
Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Flores-Bueno, D., Gómez-Puente, S. M., & Vite-León, V. O. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1391485 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“Some of the AI-powered tools that have made academic misconduct simpler than ever for today's students include essay generators, online essay mills, and custom writing services (Crawford et al., 2023).”
BackgroundLi, B., Bonk, C. J., Wang, C., & Kou, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3386098 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“In addition, concerns have [28]andthepotentialimpactoneducational assessmentpractices[29].”
BackgroundUniversity students’ self-reported reliance on ChatGPT for learning: A latent profile analysis
Stojanov, A., Liu, Q., & Koh, J. H. L. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100243 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Race with the machines: assessing the capability of generative AI in solving authentic assessments
Nguyen Thanh, B., Vo, D. T. H., Nguyen Nhat, M., Pham, T. T. T., Thai Trung, H., & Ha Xuan, S. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8902 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“Moreover, educators are faced with the formidable task of designing assessment tasks that not only leverage the benefits of generative AI but also ensure student learning outcomes are met (Crawford et al., 2023).”
BackgroundSaúde, S., Barros, J. P., & Almeida, I. A. T. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13080410 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Garagorry Guerra, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-12-2023-0236 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
ChatGPT, Üretken Yapay Zeka ve Algoritmik Paradigma Değişikliği
BOZKURT, A. (2023) · Alanyazın · doi:10.59320/alanyazin.1283282 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning
Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00173-z · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“The relevant application of ChatGPT in higher education focuses on several areas, including developing assignments [4], supporting essay writing [5], and encouraging critical reflection on AI’s use in society [6].”
Adams, D., Chuah, K.-M., Devadason, E., & Azzis, M. S. A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12427-8 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
“In addition, students also found it to be useful in elevating their stress, and assisting them in comprehending complex concepts in their studies (Crawford et al., 2023; Smith et al., 2023 ).”
Chatbots and AI in Education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad, and the ugly
Ifelebuegu, A. O., Kulume, P., & Cherukut, P. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.29 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Bender, S. M. (2024) · Changing English · doi:10.1080/1358684x.2024.2309995 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“…forecasts about AI’s application across multiple sectors, including medical, legal, and educational (Ahuja 2019; Grassini 2023), though it also very quickly provoked complaints that school and university students would be able to plagiarise essays (Crawford, Cowling, and Allen 2023; Oravec 2023).”
BackgroundLearning with Generative Artificial Intelligence Within a Network of Co-Regulation
Lodge, J. M., De Barba, P., & Broadbent, J. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.7.02 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Li, Y., Sadiq, G., Qambar, G., & Zheng, P. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12981-9 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“One potential explanation for this is ChatGPT’s ability to expedite learning by providing swift solutions to challenging tasks, also highlighted by Crawford et al. ( 2023 ).”
Kong, S. C., Lee, J. C., & Tsang, O. (2024) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2024.19030 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Critical thinking has been suggested as a fundamental skill for citizens in the age of AI and especially with the widespread use of generative AI (Crawford et al., 2023; Rampersad, 2020).”
BackgroundBozkurt, A. (2023) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Creative Use of OpenAI in Education: Case Studies from Game Development
French, F., Levi, D., Maczo, C., Simonaityte, A., Triantafyllidis, S., & Varda, G. (2023) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti7080081 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“[1] acknowledge that ChatGPT can support learning outcomes, while simultaneously calling for new leadership in higher education that will ensure that AI is used ethically.”
BackgroundGulati, A., Saini, H., Singh, S., & Kumar, V. (2024) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2023.2300139 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Besides, universities also possess the ability to modify assessment tasks in a manner that renders them less susceptible to facile completion by AI tools (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023).”
Li, Y., Song, Y., Sun, Y., & Zeng, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102518 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Inteligencia artificial generativa y educación
García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2024) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks.31942 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Rethinking online assessment strategies: Authenticity versus AI chatbot intervention
Ifelebuegu, A. O. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“This method equips students with vital skills for interacting with systems like ChatGPT in future professional environments.”
BackgroundInfluentialChatGPT and higher education assessments: More opportunities than concerns?
Gamage, K. A. A., Dehideniya, S. C. P., Xu, Z., & Tang, X. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.32 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Emerging Research and Policy Themes on Academic Integrity in the Age of Chat GPT and Generative AI
Plata, S., De Guzman, M. A., & Quesada, A. (2023) · Asian Journal of University Education · doi:10.24191/ajue.v19i4.24697 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Generative AI as source of change of knowledge management paradigm
Kaczorowska–Spychalska, D., Kotula, N., Mazurek, G., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2024) · Human Technology · doi:10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-1.7 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Based on this, it combines words to form sentences and paragraphs based on what others have said on the topic, and its output takes on an innovative character, often also considered creative (Crawford et al., 2023).”
BackgroundPani, B., Crawford, J., & Allen, K.-A. (2024) · Applications of Generative AI · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46238-2_13 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationFaruk, L. I. D., Rohan, R., Ninrutsirikun, U., & Pal, D. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3628454.3629552 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Empowering learners with ChatGPT: insights from a systematic literature exploration
Mohebi, L. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00120-y · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Crawford et al. [3] emphasized the ethical implications of ChatGPT.”
Generative AI Usage and Academic PerformancePreprint
Wecks, J. O., Voshaar, J., Plate, B. J., & Zimmermann, J. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4812513 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Watters, C., & Lemański, M. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2023.1224976 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT as a Tool to Strengthen Benefits of the Flipped Learning Strategy
Huesca, G., Martínez-Treviño, Y., Espinosa, J. M. M., Sanromán-Calleros, A. R., Martínez-Román, R., Cendejas-Castro, E. A., & Bustos, R. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14060660 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Zlotnikova, I., Hlomani, H., Mokgetse, T. L., & Bagai, K. (2025) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-07-2024-0104 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Cowling, M., Crawford, J., Allen, K.-A., & Wehmeyer, M. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8598 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“Each author has published dozens of papers prior to the benchmark period, and ChatGPT recognised only one of the authors, with the remaining two (both of whom have public research profiles, Google Scholar, Scopus, ORCiD and Web of Science profiles) unidentifiable: I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, my training da…”
BackgroundSelf-citationCheating and plagiarism in higher education institutions (HEIs): A literature review
Sozon, M., Alkharabsheh, O. H. M., Fong, P. W., & Chuan, S. B. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.147140.2 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence and sustainable higher education: Mapping the potential
Νικολοπούλου, Κ. (2025) · Journal of Digital Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/jdet/15860 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Concerns associated with academic integrity (Bearman et al., 2023), cheating, plagiarism, and potential misuse have been reported (Crawford et al., 2023; Grassini, 2023; Moorhouse et al., 2023).”
Waiting for the revolution: how higher education institutions initially responded to ChatGPT
Korseberg, L., & Elken, M. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01256-4 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“…experiences with and reflections on Chat-GPT (see e.g. Iskender, 2023; Stojanov, 2023), or they focus on the impacts of ChatGPT on academic integrity and the assessments of students (see e.g. Cotton et al., 2023; Crawford et al., 2023; Currie et al., 2023; Perkins, 2023; Rudolph et al., 2023).”
A Systematic Review of Generative AI and (English Medium Instruction) Higher Education
Bannister, P., Urbieta, A. S., & Peñalver, E. A. (2023) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.52.4.2023.401-409 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“The established terms used were “EMI”, “English as a Medium of Instruction”, “HE”, “Higher Ed-ucation”, “GenAI”, “Generative Artificial Intelligence”, “AI”, and “Artificial Intelligence”.”
BackgroundInfluentialBlahopoulou, J., & Ortiz-Bonnin, S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13575-9 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“…offer valuable insights into the role of ChatGPT in academic settings, there remains a scarcity of empirical, peer-reviewed, and quantitative research comparing the perceptions of AI integration between users and non-users (Abbasi et al., 2024; Crawford et al., 2023; Guo et al., 2024a , b ).”
Ethical Aspects of ChatGPT in Software Engineering Research
Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., & Liang, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3318183 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Development and validation of generative artificial intelligence attitude scale for students
Marengo, A., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1528455 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Heine, S., & König, J. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2540791 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“While some advocate treating AI as a study partner or peer, others threaten exmatriculation for its use (Crawford, Cowling, and Allen 2023).”
Pasupuleti, R. S., & Thiyyagura, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12573-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Previous studies has demonstrated the usefulness of ChatGPT in activities such as assignment creation (Sullivan et al., 2023), essay writing (Su et al., 2023), English as a foreign language (EFL) learning (Strzelecki, 2023) and general proofreading (Crawford et al., 2023).”
Swindell, A., Greeley, L., Farag, A., & Verdone, B. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i2.4438 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Kumar, S., Gunn, A., Rose, R., Pollard, R., Johnson, M. C., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i3.4501 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“…related to privacy, ethics, academic integrity, and profiling accompany AI-generated content, AI-based assessment, and similar technologies, leading to uncertainty among faculty and administrators about how to appropriately address those challenges (Bozkurt et al., 2023; Crawford et al., 2023).”
Background
- Authors
- Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
- Publisher
- Open Access Publishing Association
- Published
- 2023-04-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1449-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4323536358
- Semantic Scholar
- 370a9fff56ff5b9a54c96b818cff34b9c59e1b67
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 102
- FWCI
- 128.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (publishedVersion)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, generative AI in higher education, academic integrity, plagiarism, character development, educational leadership, authentic assessment, student learning, AI chatbots, deep learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review