The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success
Open accessAbstract
The use of live vaccines, either attenuated or non-attenuated, for the control of coccidiosis due to Eimeria infections in broiler breeder or layer chickens is well established. Use in broilers, however, has been slow to gain acceptance. This has been partly for economic reasons, but also because of perceived adverse effects on early chick growth, particularly with non-attenuated vaccines, and concerns about timely onset of protective immunity in such short-lived birds. This review describes advances in understanding of epidemiological factors and recent improvements of administration methods that have helped to allay these fears and to make the use of anticoccidial vaccines in broilers technically achievable. Topics discussed include: (1) types of commercially available vaccine, (2) vaccines in development, (3) vaccination methods and equipment, (4) basis of vaccine efficacy and immunogenic variation of parasites, (5) key factors in the survival, sporulation and dissemination of vaccinal oocysts, (6) descriptions and significance of patterns of litter oocyst accumulation and occurrence of intestinal lesions in vaccinated flocks, (7) rotation of anticoccidial vaccination and chemotherapy to restore drug sensitivity to resistant wild-type coccidia, (8) combinations of anticoccidial vaccination and chemotherapy, (9) interactions between coccidiosis and clostridiosis in broilers and compatibilities of potential control methods, (10) published performance data for live anticoccidial vaccines in broilers, (11) possible further developments of live vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health
Immerseel, F. V., Buck, J. D., Pasmans, F., Huyghebaert, G., Haesebrouck, F., & Ducatelle, R. (2004) · Avian Pathology · doi:10.1080/03079450400013162 · Cited by 656
Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development
Dalloul, R. A., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2006) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.5.1.143 · Cited by 607
Williams, R. B. (2005) · Avian Pathology · doi:10.1080/03079450500112195 · Cited by 527
Self-citationThe Biology of Avian Eimeria with an Emphasis on their Control by Vaccination
Shirley, M. W., Smith, A. L., & Tomley, F. M. (2005) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(05)60005-x · Cited by 405
Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies
Peek, H. W., & Landman, W. J. M. (2011) · Veterinary Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01652176.2011.605247 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R. B.
- Venue
- Avian Pathology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-353
- ISSN
- 0307-9457 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3338
- OpenAlex
- W2051402309
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03079450220148988
- The paper
- Williams, R. B. (2002). Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: Pathways to success. Avian Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450220148988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.