The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies
Abstract
Coccidiosis in chickens is a parasitic disease with great economic significance, which has been controlled successfully for decades using mainly anticoccidial products. However, large-scale and long-term use of anticoccidial drugs has led to the worldwide development of resistance against all these drugs. In order to minimize the occurrence of resistance, the rotation of various anticoccidial drugs in single and/or shuttle programmes is used. Unfortunately, this has not solved the anticoccidial resistance problem. Recently, live anticoccidial vaccines have been incorporated into rotation programmes, resulting in an increasing incidence of anticoccidial drug-sensitive Eimeria spp. field isolates, which may ameliorate the efficacy of anticoccidial drugs. Nevertheless, possible upcoming bans restricting the use of anticoccidials as feed additives, consumer concerns on residues and increasing regulations have prompted the quest for alternative coccidiosis control strategies. Although management and biosecurity measures could halt the introduction of Eimeria spp. to a farm, in practice they do not suffice to prevent coccidiosis outbreaks. Phytotherapy, aromatherapy and pre- and probiotics either show conflicting, non-consistent or non-convincing results, and have therefore not been applied at a large scale in the field. So far, live attenuated and non-attenuated anticoccidial vaccines have proved to be the most solid and successful coccidiosis prevention and control strategy. Despite the drawbacks associated with their production and use, their popularity is increasing. If with time, the immunogenicity of subunit vaccines can be improved, they could represent the next generation of highly efficient and low-cost anticoccidial strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,667
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production
Patterson, J., & Burkholder, K. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.4.627 · Cited by 1,405
Spring, P., Wenk, C., Dawson, K. A., & Newman, K. E. (2000) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/79.2.205 · Cited by 798
Introducing inulin-type fructans
Roberfroid, M. B. (2005) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20041350 · Cited by 793
Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development
Dalloul, R. A., & Lillehoj, H. S. (2006) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.5.1.143 · Cited by 607
Clinical trials of homoeopathy.
Kleijnen, J., Knipschild, P., & ter Riet, G. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6772.316 · Cited by 604
Adams, L. B., Hibbs, J. B., Taintor, R. R., & Krahenbuhl, J. L. (1990) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.144.7.2725 · Cited by 563
Allen, P. C., & Fetterer, R. H. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.1.58-65.2002 · Cited by 513
Loo, J. V., Cummings, J., Delzenne, N., Englyst, H., Franck, A., Hopkins, M., Kok, N., Macfarlane, G., Newton, D., Quigley, M., et al. (1999) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114599000252 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Development of immunization trials against Eimeria spp.
Ahmad, T. A., El-Sayed, B. A., & El-Sayed, L. H. (2016) · Trials in Vaccinology · doi:10.1016/j.trivac.2016.02.001 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Peek, H. W., & Landman, W. J. M.
- Venue
- Veterinary Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 143-161
- ISSN
- 0165-2176 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-5941
- OpenAlex
- W2102895163
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 16.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01652176.2011.605247
- The paper
- Peek, H. W., & Landman, W. J. M. (2011). Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Veterinary Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2011.605247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.