Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The antinomies of audit: opacity, instability and charisma in the economic governance of a Hooghly shipyard

Bear, Laura·2013·Economy and Society
DOI 10.1080/03085147.2013.791509
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03085147.2013.791509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.7312/bear14002 · DOI
  2. 10.3167/fcl.2011.610104 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/0308275X08101029 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/CBO9781139171076 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Breman J., 2004, The making and unmaking of an industrial working class: Sliding down the labour hierarchy in Ahmedabad, India
  6. Chatterjee P., 2004, The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world
  7. 10.1177/0308275X10372467 · DOI
  8. 10.3167/fcl.2011.600104 · DOI · Paper page
  9. De Neve G., 2009, Economic and Political Weekly, 63
  10. 10.1080/00141840701396573 · DOI
  11. Dunn E., 2004, Privatising Poland: Baby food, big business and the remaking of labour
  12. Dunn E., 2008, Global assemblages: Technology, politics, ethics, 173
  13. Fuller C., 2006, Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 258
  14. 10.1080/03085140802172680 · DOI
  15. Guyer J., 2004, Marginal gains: Monetary transactions in Atlantic Africa
  16. Harvey D., 1989, The condition of post-modernity
  17. Hirway I., 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, 57
  18. 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00034.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0308275X9801800303 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/03085140802172706 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nisbett N., 2009, Growing up in the knowledge society: Living the IT dream in Bangalore
  22. Parry J.P., 2011, Institutions and inequalities: Essays in honour of André Béteille, 129
  23. Roitman J., 2004, Fiscal disobedience: An anthropology of economic regulation in Central Africa
  24. Roy A., 2002, City requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the politics of poverty
  25. Sanyal K., 2009, Economic and Political Weekly, 35
  26. 10.1515/9781400830596 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1080/08935690902743088 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Vijay G., 2009, Economic and Political Weekly, 85
  29. Vijayabaskar M., 2011, Economic and Political Weekly, 38

Cited by

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Bear, L.
Venue
Economy and Society
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
375-397
ISSN
  • 0308-5147
  • 1469-5766
DOI
10.1080/03085147.2013.791509
Cited by
28
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The antinomies of audit: opacity, instability and charisma in the economic governance of a Hooghly shipyard. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03085147.2013.791509
The paper
Bear, L. (2013). The antinomies of audit: opacity, instability and charisma in the economic governance of a Hooghly shipyard. Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2013.791509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.