The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing?
Open accessAbstract
In this article, I analyze the social processes of performance audits in a variety of cases in China, other postsocialist nations, and a U.S. workplace with Chinese immigrant employees. Although the processes share many commonalities, the ideological evaluations of them by the people involved are often diametrically opposed to those by anthropological analysts. For example, the Chinese workers often describe the performance audits as “socialist,” whereas the anthropological analysts tend to see them as a form of “neoliberal” governmentality. I use these contradictory evaluations to develop a critique of Nikolas Rose's conceptualization of “neoliberal governmentality,” especially when it is used as an explanation for contemporary processes of governing. Building on the comparative analysis of the performance audit cases, I conclude with a call for a classic anthropological approach to the study of audit cultures. [governmentality, audit cultures, China, socialism, neoliberalism]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty
Ong, A. (2006) · doi:10.1215/9780822387879 · Cited by 3,906
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877
Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood
Rose, N. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511752179 · Cited by 2,809
Hursh, D. (2005) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.6 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Gershon, I. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/660866 · Cited by 616
Creative Heritage: Palestinian Heritage NGOs and Defiant Arts of Government
De Cesari, C. (2010) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01280.x · Cited by 71
Audit Bodies: Embodied Participation, Disability Universalism, and Accessibility in India
Friedner, M., & Osborne, J. (2013) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00990.x · Cited by 43
Subprime Empire: On the In-Betweenness of Finance
Schuster, C., & Kar, S. (2021) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/716066 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- KIPNIS, A. B.
- Venue
- American Ethnologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-289
- ISSN
- 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2109366668
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 94.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00034.x
- The paper
- KIPNIS, A. B. (2008). Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing? American Ethnologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00034.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.