The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
Abstract
Several test statistics are proposed for the purpose of assessing the goodness of fit of the multiple logistic regression model. The test statistics are obtained by applying a chi-square test for a contingency table in which the expected frequencies are determined using two different grouping strategies and two different sets of distributional assumptions. The null distributions of these statistics are examined by applying the theory for chi-square tests of Moore Spruill (1975) and through computer simulations. All statistics are shown to have a chi-square distribution or a distribution which can be well approximated by a chi-square. The degrees of freedom are shown to depend on the particular statistic and the distributional assumptions. The power of each of the proposed statistics is examined for the normal, linear, and exponential alternative models using computer simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Afifi , A.A. and Azen , S.P. 1979 . Statistical Analysis: A Computer Oriented Approach, Second Edition , New York : Academic Press .
- 10.1214/aoms/1177728726 · DOI · Paper page
- Durst and Mark . 1979 . Personal communication, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mathematics Dept , M.I.T .
- 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0021-9681(71)90106-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0021-9681(75)90037-5 · DOI
- Heinonen , D.P. , Slone , D. and Shapiro , S. 1977 . Birth Defects and Drugs in Pregnancy , Littleton, Mass : Publishing Sciences Group, Inc .
- 10.1214/aoms/1177693502 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177693502
- 10.1214/aos/1176343125 · DOI · Paper page
- Shillington , E.R. 1978 . A chi-square goodness of fit test for logistic data, presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association , California : San Diego .
- 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90082-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2527749 · DOI
Cited by
AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Real, R. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · Cited by 3,499
Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From a Multisite Case Control Study
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., Glass, N., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.7.1089 · Cited by 1,550
Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States
Narayan, K. M. V. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.14.1884 · Cited by 1,515
Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption
Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571111161262 · Cited by 1,181
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475 · Cited by 1,043
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosmer, D. W., & Lemesbow, S.
- Venue
- Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1043-1069
- ISSN
- 0361-0926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031687681
- Cited by
- 1,871
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03610928008827941
- The paper
- Hosmer, D. W., & Lemesbow, S. (1980). Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
