Cited by 958Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Systems and Public Health

A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham

Truett, Jeanne, Cornfield, Jerome, Kannel, William·1967·Journal of Chronic Diseases

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9681(67)90082-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truett, J., Cornfield, J., & Kannel, W.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Chronic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1967-07
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
511-524
ISSN
0021-9681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075691011
Cited by
958
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
14.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chronic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, Framingham Heart Study, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Coronary Disease, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Probability, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review