The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship
Abstract
Communication skills, as defined by Burleson and Samter (1990), were examined in the teacher‐student relationship. Three questions guided this investigation: (a) with regard to effective teaching, what are students’ perceptions of the importance of communication skills and immediacy behaviors? (b) what is the relationship between students’ perceptions of teachers’ use of communication skills, immediacy behaviors, motivation and learning? and (c) do male and female students differ in their perceptions of communication skill and immediacy behaviors in regard to importance, motivation, and learning? Two studies were conducted. Study one found that students reported referential skill, ego support, and conflict management as being most important to effective teaching. Study two found referential skill, ego support, and immediacy to have a strong relationship with student learning and motivation. Some sex differences also were found and explored in both study one and two.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERGER, C. R., & CALABRESE, R. J. (1975) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x · Cited by 3,006
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332
Cited by
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
Chory‐Assad, R. M. (2002) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370209385646 · Cited by 286
An exploratory study of students’ weekly stress levels and sources of stress during the semester
Pitt, A., Oprescu, F., Tapia, G., & Gray, M. (2018) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787417731194 · Cited by 164
Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning
King, P., & Witt, P. (2009) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520802511233 · Cited by 86
Cole, A. W., Anderson, C., Bunton, T., Cherney, M. R., Cronin Fisher, V., Draeger, Jr., Featherston, M., Motel, L., Nicolini, K. M., Peck, B., et al. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.966 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L.
- Venue
- Communication Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-219
- ISSN
- 0363-4523 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5795
- OpenAlex
- W2069753881
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03634520009379209
- The paper
- Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.