The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration
Abstract
In the literature on European integration, politicization as concept is often attributed major importance. This article shows how the literature variously discusses the politicization of European Union (EU) institutions, the politicization of EU decision‐making processes or the politicization of EU issues. Similarly, the literature attributes three different functions to politicization: it functions to crystallize opposing advocacy coalitions, to raise the question of legitimacy and to alter the course of European integration. Despite this diversity, this article argues we are in fact dealing with an encompassing process. To further our understanding of politicization of European integration, politicization as process is defined as an increase in polarization of opinions, interests or values and the extent to which they are publicly advanced towards policy formulation within the EU. Furthermore, attention is directed to practices of representative claims‐making in the public sphere through which relationships of delegation and accountability can be altered in discourse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,262
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123408000409 · Cited by 3,124
The Principles of Representative Government
Manin, B. (1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511659935 · Cited by 2,339
Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik
FOLLESDAL, A., & HIX, S. (2006) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x · Cited by 1,718
Saward, M. (2006) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234 · Cited by 1,471
The principles of representative government
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3567 · Cited by 1,431
‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies'
(2017) · Political Accountability · doi:10.4324/9781315246567-15 · Cited by 1,002
Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community.
Schwarz, J. E., Lindberg, L. N., & Scheingold, S. A. (1971) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2110119 · Cited by 925
Political Parties in the European Union
Hix, S., & Lord, C. (1997) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25560-3 · Cited by 842
Cited by
Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed?*
DE WILDE, P., & ZÜRN, M. (2012) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x · Cited by 477
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- De Wilde, P.
- Venue
- Journal of European Integration
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 559-575
- ISSN
- 0703-6337 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2280
- OpenAlex
- W2081711013
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 71.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
- The paper
- De Wilde, P. (2011). No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration. Journal of European Integration. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.