Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,718

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik

FOLLESDAL, ANDREAS, HIX, SIMON·2006·JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies

Abstract

Giandomenico Majone and Andrew Moravcsik have argued that the EU does not suffer a ‘democratic deficit’. We disagree about one key element: whether a democratic polity requires contestation for political leadership and over policy. This aspect is an essential element of even the ‘thinnest’ theories of democracy, yet is conspicuously absent in the EU.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
FOLLESDAL, A., & HIX, S.
Venue
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-16
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
533-562
ISSN
  • 0021-9886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5965
OpenAlex
W2124252203
Cited by
1,718
References
0
FWCI
410.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
The paper
FOLLESDAL, A., & HIX, S. (2006). Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.