The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions
Abstract
During their doctoral studies, students undergo an emotionally and intellectually intensive process involving a wide range of positive and negative experiences. This article analyses PhD students’ perceptions of the most positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions. Previous researchers have primarily focused on analysing experiences that negatively affect doctoral work and have related these experiences to institutional, social and individual variables. However, little is known regarding positive experiences and how both positive and negative experiences are interpreted and related to variables connected with doctoral study, such as discipline, funding, enrolment type, and the stage of the doctoral process. In total, 1173 doctoral students from 56 Spanish universities completed an open-ended online survey. The findings indicate that opportunities for PhD students to communicate their scientific advances, receive expert feedback and interact with other researchers have a high positive influence on their doctoral journey. However, funding difficulties, particularly for students in the social sciences, and relationships with the research community, principally with the supervisor, were perceived as the main negative challenges. Experiences related to research design, data collection and analysis were perceived either negatively – primarily for mid-level students – or positively. These results should be considered in future doctoral programme policies t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Corcelles et al. (2019) stated that funding issues are among the main challenges faced by PhD researchers during their doctoral studies.”
From Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students (2023) · cites this paper as Corcelles et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?
Nulty, D. D. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293231 · Cited by 2,581
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.28945/58 · DOI
- Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XIX, pp. 481–534). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- 10.1007/s11162-011-9225-4 · DOI
- 10.58680/rte201323634 · DOI
- Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). Trends influencing researcher education and careers: What do we know, need to know and do in looking forward? Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 1–4.
- 10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/07294360.2012.680017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221546.2010.11778970 · DOI
- 10.28945/1561 · DOI
- Hyland K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. · DOI
- 10.28945/1700 · DOI
- 10.1174/021037013807533061 · DOI
- 10.1080/01580370902927378 · DOI
- 10.1108/1759751X201100007 · DOI
- 10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03075070802601960 · DOI
- OECD. (2014). Who are the doctorate holders and where do their qualifications lead them? Education Indicators in Focus, 25, 1–4.
- 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136 · DOI
- Pyhältö, K., Nummenmaa, A. R., Soini, T., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Research on scholarly communities and development of scholarly identity in Finnish doctoral education. In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.) Higher education research in Finland: Emerging structures and contemporary issues (pp. 337–357). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research Customer services.
- Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of experienced problems and well-being of doctoral students. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Education, 2012, Article ID 934941.
- 10.28945/1745 · DOI
- Real Decreto 99/2011. Enseñanzas Oficiales de Doctorado. Boletin Oficial del Estado, 35. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2011-2541
- 10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00026 · DOI
- 10.1080/00221546.2009.11772128 · DOI
- 10.28945/1870 · DOI
- 10.1080/03098770701424983 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students
Nori, H., & Vanttaja, M. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00921-w · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M.
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 922-939
- ISSN
- 0729-4360
- 1469-8366
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSO2013-41108-R)
- European Erasmus + Programme (2017-1-ES01-KA203-038303)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review