Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions

Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., González-Ocampo, G., Castelló, M.·2019·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

During their doctoral studies, students undergo an emotionally and intellectually intensive process involving a wide range of positive and negative experiences. This article analyses PhD students’ perceptions of the most positive and negative experiences related to doctoral study conditions. Previous researchers have primarily focused on analysing experiences that negatively affect doctoral work and have related these experiences to institutional, social and individual variables. However, little is known regarding positive experiences and how both positive and negative experiences are interpreted and related to variables connected with doctoral study, such as discipline, funding, enrolment type, and the stage of the doctoral process. In total, 1173 doctoral students from 56 Spanish universities completed an open-ended online survey. The findings indicate that opportunities for PhD students to communicate their scientific advances, receive expert feedback and interact with other researchers have a high positive influence on their doctoral journey. However, funding difficulties, particularly for students in the social sciences, and relationships with the research community, principally with the supervisor, were perceived as the main negative challenges. Experiences related to research design, data collection and analysis were perceived either negatively – primarily for mid-level students – or positively. These results should be considered in future doctoral programme policies t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2019.1602596

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.28945/58 · DOI
  2. Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XIX, pp. 481–534). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. 10.1007/s11162-011-9225-4 · DOI
  4. 10.58680/rte201323634 · DOI
  5. Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). Trends influencing researcher education and careers: What do we know, need to know and do in looking forward? Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 1–4.
  6. 10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/07294360.2012.680017 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/00221546.2010.11778970 · DOI
  11. 10.28945/1561 · DOI
  12. Hyland K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. · DOI
  13. 10.28945/1700 · DOI
  14. 10.1174/021037013807533061 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/01580370902927378 · DOI
  16. 10.1108/1759751X201100007 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1080/03075070802601960 · DOI
  19. OECD. (2014). Who are the doctorate holders and where do their qualifications lead them? Education Indicators in Focus, 25, 1–4.
  20. 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136 · DOI
  21. Pyhältö, K., Nummenmaa, A. R., Soini, T., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Research on scholarly communities and development of scholarly identity in Finnish doctoral education. In S. Ahola & D. M. Hoffman (Eds.) Higher education research in Finland: Emerging structures and contemporary issues (pp. 337–357). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research Customer services.
  22. Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of experienced problems and well-being of doctoral students. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Education, 2012, Article ID 934941.
  23. 10.28945/1745 · DOI
  24. Real Decreto 99/2011. Enseñanzas Oficiales de Doctorado. Boletin Oficial del Estado, 35. Retrieved from https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2011-2541
  25. 10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00026 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/00221546.2009.11772128 · DOI
  27. 10.28945/1870 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/03098770701424983 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Corcelles, M., Cano, M., Liesa, E., González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M.
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2019-04-11
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
922-939
ISSN
  • 0729-4360
  • 1469-8366
Cited by
43
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSO2013-41108-R)
  • European Erasmus + Programme (2017-1-ES01-KA203-038303)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review