Effect of dietary oat and soy fiber on bowel function and clinical tolerance in a tube feeding dependent population.
Abstract
Objective The role of fiber in tube feeding products has not clearly been defined. While some studies suggest that fiber can increase stool weight and bowel transit time in acutely ill patients, there is less information in stable patients receiving chronic enteral nutritional support. Design Using a crossover study design, we investigated the effect of 28.8 g/day of a 50% soy and 50% oat fiber combination in 10 medically stable residents of a chronic care facility. Subjects were randomized to initially receive 10 days of either Isocal HN or Ultracal, which are identical in composition except Ultracal contains 14.4 g/L of fiber. After the first 10-day study, subjects underwent a washout followed by a second 10-day study using the other product. Fecal dye markers were used to identify appropriate collection times. Results Fiber significantly increased the number of bowel movements per day (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2, p Conclusion We conclude that the addition of a combination of soy and oat fiber to tube feeding material is well tolerated, and promotes regular bowel movements without altering the rate of gastric emptying or intestinal transit time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fiber-containing products for enteral nutrition have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function.
“Conversely, fiber-containing products for EN have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and are, thus, generally recommended.”
From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics
Volkert, D., Beck, A. M., Cederholm, T., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Hooper, L., Kiesswetter, E., Maggio, M., Raynaud-Simon, A., Sieber, C., Sobotka, L., et al. (2022) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Wierdsma, N. J., van Bodegraven, A. A., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Arjaans, W., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Kruizenga, H. M., & van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren, M. A. E. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365520902839675 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zarling, E. J., Edison, T., Berger, S., Leya, J., & DeMeo, M.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- DeMeo, M
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 565-568
- ISSN
- 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1087
- OpenAlex
- W2074805652
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- dietary fiber, oat fiber, soy fiber, tube feeding, enteral nutrition, bowel function, defecation, fecal weight, fecal nitrogen, gastric emptying, intestinal transit time, long-term care residents, clinical tolerance
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Defecation, Dietary Fiber, Digestive System Physiological Phenomena, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enteral Nutrition, Feces, Food, Formulated, Gastric Emptying, Gastrointestinal Motility, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrogen, Glycine max, Avena, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review