Cited by 30Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGastrointestinal motility and disordersFood composition and properties

Effect of dietary oat and soy fiber on bowel function and clinical tolerance in a tube feeding dependent population.

Zarling, E J, Edison, T, Berger, S, Leya, J, DeMeo, M·1994·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

Objective The role of fiber in tube feeding products has not clearly been defined. While some studies suggest that fiber can increase stool weight and bowel transit time in acutely ill patients, there is less information in stable patients receiving chronic enteral nutritional support. Design Using a crossover study design, we investigated the effect of 28.8 g/day of a 50% soy and 50% oat fiber combination in 10 medically stable residents of a chronic care facility. Subjects were randomized to initially receive 10 days of either Isocal HN or Ultracal, which are identical in composition except Ultracal contains 14.4 g/L of fiber. After the first 10-day study, subjects underwent a washout followed by a second 10-day study using the other product. Fecal dye markers were used to identify appropriate collection times. Results Fiber significantly increased the number of bowel movements per day (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2, p Conclusion We conclude that the addition of a combination of soy and oat fiber to tube feeding material is well tolerated, and promotes regular bowel movements without altering the rate of gastric emptying or intestinal transit time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.1994.10718448

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiber-containing products for enteral nutrition have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function.

    “Conversely, fiber-containing products for EN have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and are, thus, generally recommended.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarling, E. J., Edison, T., Berger, S., Leya, J., & DeMeo, M.
Affiliations
Loyola University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
1994-12
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
565-568
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2074805652
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
dietary fiber, oat fiber, soy fiber, tube feeding, enteral nutrition, bowel function, defecation, fecal weight, fecal nitrogen, gastric emptying, intestinal transit time, long-term care residents, clinical tolerance
MeSH terms
Aged, Defecation, Dietary Fiber, Digestive System Physiological Phenomena, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enteral Nutrition, Feces, Food, Formulated, Gastric Emptying, Gastrointestinal Motility, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrogen, Glycine max, Avena, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review