Cited by 33Microbial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGut microbiota and health

Fructo-oligosaccharides and fibre in enteral nutrition has a beneficial influence on microbiota and gastrointestinal quality of life

Wierdsma, Nicolette J., van Bodegraven, Adriaan A., Uitdehaag, Bernhard M. J., Arjaans, Willy, Savelkoul, Paul H. M., Kruizenga, Hinke M., van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren, Marian A. E.·2009·Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal microbiota is important in health and disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and fibre-enriched tube feeding on quality of life and intestinal microbiota (faecal Bifidobacteria). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nineteen out of 59 home-living, tube-feeding-dependent, adult patients and matched healthy controls were included in this randomized, double-blind study. After a washout period, patients received either no residue tube feeding (non-FOS group) or FOS and fibre-enriched tube feeding (FOS group). Quality of life as defined by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and quantification of faecal Bifidobacteria were determined. RESULTS: At baseline, GIQLI scores in controls and patients were 88+/-12 and 67+/-14, respectively (p=0.001). Following 6 weeks' intervention, GIQLI scores remained stable (65+/-14 versus 67+/-17) in the FOS group, whereas the non-FOS group values decreased (68+/-17 versus 64+/-19). Baseline faecal samples contained 2. 1x 10(7)+/-3.5 x 10(7) and 2.1 x 10(6)+/-5.6 x10(6)Bifidobacteria (p=0.002) in controls and patients, respectively, with no differences between patient groups. During the intervention, this number remained stable in the FOS group (0.7 x 10(6)+/-1.3 x 10(6) versus 1.0 x 10(6)+/-1.3 x 10(6) baseline versus end-point), but decreased in the non-FOS group (3.6 x1 0(6)+/-8.0 x 10(6) versus 2.5 x 10(4)+/-4.0 x 10(4)). GIQLI scores were correlated with the number of faecal Bifidobacteria (r=0.41, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The GIQL score for the tube-fed patients increased with the number of faecal Bifidobacteria, although in a non-linear way, and addition of FOS increased the number of Bifidobacteria. This suggests that prebiotic tube feeding may lead to a change in intestinal microbiota that could induce an increased quality of life in these patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00365520902839675

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wierdsma, N. J., van Bodegraven, A. A., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Arjaans, W., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Kruizenga, H. M., & van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren, M. A. E.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Wierdsma, Nicolette J.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2009-01
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
804-812
ISSN
  • 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7708
OpenAlex
W1975358609
Cited by
33
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
fructooligosaccharides, dietary fiber, enteral nutrition, tube feeding, gut microbiota, Bifidobacterium, gastrointestinal quality of life, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, home care, prebiotics, fecal microbiota, fecal calprotectin
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bifidobacterium, Dietary Fiber, Enteral Nutrition, Feces, Humans, Intestines, Middle Aged, Oligosaccharides, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review