The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) is one of the most widely used screening instruments for depression among the elderly. The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the GDS-15 (GDS-15-J) in comparison with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for depression. METHODS: The study participants were 128 elderly outpatients (age range, 55 to 92 years) categorized into two groups (76 non-depressive patients, 52 depressive patients) based on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for depression. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that regardless of age and sex, the GDS-15-J score could be used to screen patients for depression (p < .001). The validity of the GDS-15-J for depression assessed against DSM-IV-TR criteria was excellent based on receiver operating characteristic analysis (optimal cutoff point: 6/7; sensitivity: .98; specificity: .86). The recommended optimal cutoff score when screening for depression is 6/7. To evaluate the constructive validity of the GDS-15-J, factor analysis was performed. Three factors were extracted. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .83 to the GDS-15-J scale, which indicated a high degree of internal consistency. CONCLUSION: The GDS-15-J is a clinically applicable screening instrument for depression. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this study this version of the GDS-15-J displayed excellent psychometric properties using a 6/7 cut off. Analyses suggest some items that might be removed in future studies of an abbreviated scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
American Psychiatric Association (2000) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349 · Cited by 11,069
Sheikh (1986) · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_09 · Cited by 7,236
Screening Tests for Geriatric Depression
Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Lum, O., Heersema, P. H., Adey, M., & Rose, T. L. (1982) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1300/j018v01n01_06 · Cited by 1,494
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
(2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/(issn)1099-1166 · Cited by 1,301
Clinical Gerontology; A Guide to Assessment and Intervention
Essa, M. (1987) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1987.41.3.478 · Cited by 1,060
The criterion validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review
Wancata, J., Alexandrowicz, R., Marquart, B., Weiss, M., & Friedrich, F. (2006) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00888.x · Cited by 408
Schreiner, A. S., Hayakawa, H., Morimoto, T., & Kakuma, T. (2003) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.880 · Cited by 259
HARMAN, D. (1976) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1976.tb03258.x · Cited by 170
A Japanese translation of the Geriatric Depression Scale
Niino, N. (1991) · Clinical Gerontologist · Cited by 147
Cited by
Nguyen, T., Tsujiguchi, H., Kambayashi, Y., Hara, A., Miyagi, S., Yamada, Y., Nakamura, H., Shimizu, Y., Hori, D., Suzuki, F., et al. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9121319 · Cited by 61
Baba, H., Kito, S., Nukariya, K., Takeshima, M., Fujise, N., Iga, J., Oshibuchi, H., Kawano, M., Kimura, M., Mizukami, K., et al. (2022) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13349 · Cited by 50
Morikawa, M., Lee, S., Makino, K., Harada, K., Katayama, O., Tomida, K., Yamaguchi, R., Nishijima, C., Fujii, K., Misu, Y., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2023.03.008 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugishita, K., Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Asada, T., & Tanigawa, T.
- Venue
- Clinical Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233-240
- ISSN
- 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2301
- OpenAlex
- W2466725879
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452
- The paper
- Sugishita, K., Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Asada, T., & Tanigawa, T. (2017). A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). Clinical Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.