Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J)

Open access
Sugishita, Kazuyuki, Sugishita, Morihiro, Hemmi, Isao, Asada, Takashi, Tanigawa, Takeshi·2017·Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) is one of the most widely used screening instruments for depression among the elderly. The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the GDS-15 (GDS-15-J) in comparison with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for depression. METHODS: The study participants were 128 elderly outpatients (age range, 55 to 92 years) categorized into two groups (76 non-depressive patients, 52 depressive patients) based on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for depression. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that regardless of age and sex, the GDS-15-J score could be used to screen patients for depression (p < .001). The validity of the GDS-15-J for depression assessed against DSM-IV-TR criteria was excellent based on receiver operating characteristic analysis (optimal cutoff point: 6/7; sensitivity: .98; specificity: .86). The recommended optimal cutoff score when screening for depression is 6/7. To evaluate the constructive validity of the GDS-15-J, factor analysis was performed. Three factors were extracted. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was .83 to the GDS-15-J scale, which indicated a high degree of internal consistency. CONCLUSION: The GDS-15-J is a clinically applicable screening instrument for depression. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In this study this version of the GDS-15-J displayed excellent psychometric properties using a 6/7 cut off. Analyses suggest some items that might be removed in future studies of an abbreviated scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Sugishita, K., Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Asada, T., & Tanigawa, T.
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
2016-06-29
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
233-240
ISSN
  • 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2301
OpenAlex
W2466725879
Cited by
258
References
15
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452
The paper
Sugishita, K., Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Asada, T., & Tanigawa, T. (2017). A Validity and Reliability Study of the Japanese Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). Clinical Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1199452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.