Cited by 64Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Death Ideation in Cancer Patients: Contributing Factors

Open access
Madeira, Nuno, Albuquerque, Emília, Santos, Tiago, Mendes, Alexandre, Roque, Marta·2011·Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

Abstract

Advances in cancer research and therapy have improved prognosis and the quality of life of many patients. However, previous epidemiological studies in oncologic patients have shown an increased risk of suicide. Suicidal thoughts, relatively well known in those terminally ill, may be just as important for cancer patients who are survivors or are living with the disease. Nonetheless, there is a relative paucity of data about suicidality in this setting. The authors conducted a prospective observational study to identify death thoughts and to explore the factors associated with suicidal ideation in cancer patients. A sample of 130 patients referred for psychiatric consultation was obtained following informed consent and authorization from the local ethics committee. A semistructured interview assessed sociodemographic data, psychosocial support, and information regarding the cancer process and its treatment. Psychometric instruments were used to evaluate psychopathology, namely the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. Psychiatric diagnoses were obtained through the application of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Death ideation was identified in 34.6% of patients, yet only 10% had active suicidal thoughts. Risk of suicide was associated with female gender, a psychiatric diagnosis (major depressive disorder, panic disorder, or dysthymia), difficult interpersonal relationships, associated pain, high hopelessness, and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Although suicidal thoughts are frequent in cancer patients at different stages of disease, most are transitory. Risk factors for suicidal ideation have been identified, such as depression, hopelessness, uncontrolled pain, and difficult interpersonal relationships. Further assessment is necessary to identify those at higher risk of attempting suicide, and underlying psychiatric disorders should be vigorously treated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07347332.2011.615381

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hopelessness and anxiety are risk factors of suicidal ideation among cancer patients.

    “Hopelessness and anxiety are risk factors of suicidal ideation among cancer patients.27”

    From Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Ideation among Psycho-Oncology Outpatients (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results and Discussion associate active suicidal thoughts with higher hopelessness and anxiety scores in the study sample. But these were patients referred for psychiatric consultation, and the paper describes associations rather than establishing hopelessness and anxiety as risk factors for cancer patients generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madeira, N., Albuquerque, E., Santos, T., Mendes, A., & Roque, M.
Affiliations
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil (PT)
  • Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Coimbra (PT)
  • Hospital de São Sebastião (PT)
Venue
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2011-10
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
636-642
ISSN
  • 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7586
OpenAlex
W2144215610
Cited by
64
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
suicidal ideation, death ideation, cancer patients, suicide risk factors, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, pain, interpersonal relationships, psychiatric comorbidity, psychiatric consultation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Observation, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review