Cited by 108Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Suicidal ideation in patients with cancer: A systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, intervention and assessment

Kolva, Elissa, Hoffecker, Lilian, Cox-Martin, Emily·2020·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objectives: Suicidal ideation (SI) underlies risk of death by suicide. It is well established that patients with cancer are at increased risk of death by suicide. Therefore, understanding SI in patients with cancer is critically important. The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, intervention, and assessment of SI in patients with cancer. Methods: This systematic review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018115405) and was guided by the PRISMA statement. We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and assessed for quality assurance using a revised Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We identified 439 studies to screen for eligibility. Eligible studies included adults with cancer diagnoses and listed SI as an outcome. Ultimately, 44 studies were included in the analyses. Prevalence of SI ranged greatly from 0.7% to 46.3%. Single items drawn from validated measures were the most frequent method of assessing SI (n = 20, 45.5%); additional methods included validated measures and psychological interviews. Commonly identified risk factors for SI included age, sex, and disease/treatment-related characteristics, as well as psychological constructs including depression, anxiety, hopelessness, existential distress, and social support. Significance of Results: Assessment of SI in patients with cancer is the concern of researchers worldwide. Prevalence of SI varied with study population and was likely influenced by the method of assessment. Psychological distress consistently predicted SI. Increasing awareness of demographic, clinical, and psychological associations is critical for risk assessment and intervention development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951519000610

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of suicidal ideation in this study (46.2%) was considerably higher than that among patients in cancer treatment units.

    “The prevalence of suicidal ideation in our study (46.2%) was considerably higher than that among the patients in cancer treatment units.2”
  • Several studies have confirmed a positive association between depression and suicidal ideation among patients with various types of cancer from various settings.

    “Several studies have confirmed the positive association between depression and suicidal ideation among patients with various types of cancer from various settings.2”
  • Depression itself is a well-known risk factor of suicidal ideation among cancer patients.

    “In fact, a previous study showed that emotional well-being score has high sensitivity and specificity for major depression in cancer patients,30 and depression itself is a well-known risk factor of suicidal ideation among cancer patients.2”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolva, E., Hoffecker, L., & Cox-Martin, E.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Kolva, Elissa
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
206-219
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2975876249
Cited by
108
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
suicidal ideation, cancer patients, suicide risk, prevalence, risk factors, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, hopelessness, existential suffering, social support, suicide assessment, suicide prevention interventions
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Risk Assessment, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review