Cited by 42Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentSpatial and Panel Data Analysis

A Framework for Separating Individual-Level Treatment Effects From Spillover Effects

Open access
Huber, Martin, Steinmayr, Andreas·2021·Journal of Business & Economic Statistics

Abstract

This article suggests a causal framework for separating individual-level treatment effects and spillover effects such as general equilibrium, interference, or interaction effects related to treatment distribution. We relax the stable unit treatment value assumption assuming away treatment-dependent interaction between study participants and permit spillover effects within aggregates, for example, regions. Based on our framework, we systematically categorize the individual-level and spillover effects considered in the previous literature and clarify the assumptions required for identification under different designs, for instance, based on randomization or selection on observables. Furthermore, we propose a novel difference-in-differences approach and apply it to a policy intervention extending unemployment benefit durations in selected regions of Austria that arguably affected ineligibles in treated regions through general equilibrium effects in local labor markets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07350015.2019.1668795

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Huber and Steinmayr (2021) consider extensions to allow for spillover effects.

    “Huber and Steinmayr (2021) also consider extensions to allow for spillover effects.”
  • Present techniques for addressing spatial spillover effects require the spillovers to be localized, with the magnitude of spillover between geographically distant areas assumed negligible.

    “Present techniques for addressing spatial spillover effects require the spillovers to be localized, in the sense that the magnitude of the spillover between geographically distant areas is assumed to be negligible (Clarke, 2017; Butts, 2021; Huber and Steinmayr, 2021).”

    From The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (2023) · cites this paper as Huber and Steinmayr, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, M., & Steinmayr, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE)
Corresponding author
Steinmayr, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
Published
2019-10-25
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
422-436
ISSN
  • 0735-0015 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2707
OpenAlex
W2973847869
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (280092119)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
Keywords
spillover effects, individual treatment effects, stable unit treatment value assumption, interference, general equilibrium effects, difference-in-differences, regional labor markets, causal identification, randomization, selection on observables, policy interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review