A Framework for Separating Individual-Level Treatment Effects From Spillover Effects
Open accessAbstract
This article suggests a causal framework for separating individual-level treatment effects and spillover effects such as general equilibrium, interference, or interaction effects related to treatment distribution. We relax the stable unit treatment value assumption assuming away treatment-dependent interaction between study participants and permit spillover effects within aggregates, for example, regions. Based on our framework, we systematically categorize the individual-level and spillover effects considered in the previous literature and clarify the assumptions required for identification under different designs, for instance, based on randomization or selection on observables. Furthermore, we propose a novel difference-in-differences approach and apply it to a policy intervention extending unemployment benefit durations in selected regions of Austria that arguably affected ineligibles in treated regions through general equilibrium effects in local labor markets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Huber and Steinmayr (2021) consider extensions to allow for spillover effects.
“Huber and Steinmayr (2021) also consider extensions to allow for spillover effects.”
From What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature (2023) · cites this paper as Huber and Steinmayr (2021)
Present techniques for addressing spatial spillover effects require the spillovers to be localized, with the magnitude of spillover between geographically distant areas assumed negligible.
“Present techniques for addressing spatial spillover effects require the spillovers to be localized, in the sense that the magnitude of the spillover between geographically distant areas is assumed to be negligible (Clarke, 2017; Butts, 2021; Huber and Steinmayr, 2021).”
From The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (2023) · cites this paper as Huber and Steinmayr, 2021
Cites
Robins, J. (1986) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators
Abadie, A. (2005) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/0034-6527.00321 · Cited by 2,286 · see citing works
Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects
Imai, K., Keele, L., & Yamamoto, T. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts321 · Cited by 1,628 · see citing works
Experimental Designs for Identifying Causal Mechanisms
Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2012.01032.x · Cited by 408 · see citing works
General Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tuition Policy
Heckman, J., Lochner, L., & Taber, C. (1998) · doi:10.3386/w6426 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A., & Poe, J. (2023) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland
Greenaway-McGrevy, R., & Phillips, P. C. B. (2023) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2023.103555 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huber, M., & Steinmayr, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Fribourg (CH)
- Kiel Institute for the World Economy (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Steinmayr, Andreas
- Venue
- Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-25
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 422-436
- ISSN
- 0735-0015 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2707
- OpenAlex
- W2973847869
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (publishedVersion)
- RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (280092119)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- spillover effects, individual treatment effects, stable unit treatment value assumption, interference, general equilibrium effects, difference-in-differences, regional labor markets, causal identification, randomization, selection on observables, policy interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review