The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding
Open accessAbstract
Economically, legumes (Fabaceae) represent the second most important family of crop plants after the grass family, Poaceae. Grain legumes account for 27% of world crop production and provide 33% of the dietary protein consumed by humans, while pasture and forage legumes provide vital part of animal feed. Fabaceae, the third largest family of flowering plants, has traditionally been divided into the following three subfamilies: Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae, all together with 800 genera and 20,000 species. The latter subfamily contains most of the major cultivated food and feed crops. Among the grain legumes are some of mankind's earliest crop plants, whose domestication parallelled that of cereals: Soybean in China; faba bean, lentil, chickpea and pea in the Fertile Crescent of the Near East; cowpeas and bambara groundnut in Africa; soybean and mungbeans in East Asia; pigeonpea and the grams in South Asia; and common bean, lima bean, scarlet runner bean, tepary bean and lupin in Central and South America. The importance of legumes is evidenced by their high representation in ex situ germplasm collections, with more than 1,000,000 accessions worldwide. A detailed knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships of the Fabaceae is essential for understanding the origin and diversification of this economically and ecologically important family of angiosperms. This review aims to combine the phylogenetic and genetic diversity approaches to better illustrate the origin, domestication history and preserved germplasm of major legume crops from 13 genera of six tribes and to indicate further potential both for science and agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of the health benefits of peas ( Pisum sativum L.)
Dahl, W. J., Foster, L. M., & Tyler, R. T. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512000852 · Cited by 434
Emergence of Agriculture in the Foothills of the Zagros Mountains of Iran
Riehl, S., Zeidi, M., & Conard, N. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1236743 · Cited by 257
UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silicoforward and reverse genetics tool
Dalmais, M., Schmidt, J., Le Signor, C., Moussy, F., Burstin, J., Savois, V., Aubert, G., Brunaud, V., de Oliveira, Y., Guichard, C., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r43 · Cited by 187
Cited by
The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed.
Smýkal, P., Vernoud, V., Blair, M. W., Soukup, A., & Thompson, R. D. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00351 · Cited by 331
Self-citationYang, T., Liu, R., Luo, Y., Hu, S., Wang, D., Wang, C., Pandey, M. K., Ge, S., Xu, Q., Li, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01172-2 · Cited by 191
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smýkal, P., Coyne, C. J., Ambrose, M. J., Maxted, N., Schaefer, H., Blair, M. W., Berger, J., Greene, S. L., Nelson, M. N., Besharat, N., Vymyslický, T., Toker, C., Saxena, R. K., Roorkiwal, M., Pandey, M. K., Hu, J., Li, Y. H., Wang, L. X., Guo, Y., Qiu, L. J., Redden, R. J., & Varshney, R. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-10-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 43-104
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2011204117
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352689.2014.897904
- The paper
- Smýkal, P., Coyne, C. J., Ambrose, M. J., Maxted, N., Schaefer, H., Blair, M. W., Berger, J., Greene, S. L., Nelson, M. N., Besharat, N., Vymyslický, T., Toker, C., Saxena, R. K., Roorkiwal, M., Pandey, M. K., Hu, J., Li, Y. H., Wang, L. X., Guo, Y., . . . Varshney, R. K. (2015). Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.897904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.