Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 662

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy

Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Rieseberg, Loren H.·1993·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

During the past decade, molecular techniques have provided a wealth of data that have facilitated the resolution of several controversial questions in polyploid evolution. Herein we have focused on several of these issues: (1) the frequency of recurrent formation of polyploid species; (2) the genetic consequences of multiple polyploidizations within a species; (3) the prevalence and genetic attributes of autopolyploids; and (4) the genetic changes that occur in polyploid genomes following their formation. Molecular data provide a more dynamic picture of polyploid evolution than has been traditionally espoused. Numerous studies have demonstrated multiple origins of both allopolyploids and autopolyploids. In several polyploid species studied in detail, multiple origins were found to be frequent on a local geographic scale, as well as during a short span of time. Molecular data strongly suggest that recurrent formation of polyploid species is the rule, rather than the exception. In addition, molecular data indicate that recurrent formation of polyploids has important genetic consequences, introducing considerable genetic variation from diploid progenitors into polyploid derivatives. Molecular data also suggest a much more important role for natural autopolyploids than has been historically envisioned. In contrast to the longstanding view of autopolyploidy as being rare, molecular data continue to reveal steadily increasing numbers of well-documented autoploids having tetrasomic or higher-level polysomic inheritance. Although autopolyploidy undoubtedly occurs much less frequently than allopolyploidy in natural populations, it nonetheless has been a significant evolutionary mechanism. Molecular data also provide compelling genetic evidence that contradicts the traditional view of autopolyploidy as being maladaptive. Electrophoretic studies have revealed three important attributes of autopolyploids compared to their diploid progenitors: (1) enzyme multiplicity, (2) increased heterozygosity, and (3) increased allelic diversity. Genetic variability is, in fact, typically substantially higher in autopoloids than in their diploid progenitors. These genetic attributes of autopolyploids are due to polysomic inheritance and provide strong genetic arguments for the potential success of autopolyploids in nature. In addition to providing numerous important insights into the formation of polyploids and the immediate genetic consequences of polyploidy, molecular data also have been used to study the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes. Common hypotheses on the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes include (1) gene silencing, eventually leading to extensively diploidized polyploid genomes; (2) gene diversification, resulting in regulatory or functional divergence of duplicate genes; and (3) genome diversification, resulting in chromosomal repatterning. Compelling, but limited, genetic evidence for all of these factors has been obtained in molecular analyses of polyploid species. The occurrence of these processes in polyploid genomes indicates that polyploid genomes are plastic and susceptible to evolutionary change. In summary, molecular data continue to demonstrate that polyploidization and the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes are very dynamic processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07352689309701903

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 662

Metadata

Authors
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Rieseberg, L. H.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
1993-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
243-273
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W1997906362
Cited by
662
References
1
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352689309701903
The paper
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Rieseberg, L. H. (1993). Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689309701903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.