The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy
Abstract
During the past decade, molecular techniques have provided a wealth of data that have facilitated the resolution of several controversial questions in polyploid evolution. Herein we have focused on several of these issues: (1) the frequency of recurrent formation of polyploid species; (2) the genetic consequences of multiple polyploidizations within a species; (3) the prevalence and genetic attributes of autopolyploids; and (4) the genetic changes that occur in polyploid genomes following their formation. Molecular data provide a more dynamic picture of polyploid evolution than has been traditionally espoused. Numerous studies have demonstrated multiple origins of both allopolyploids and autopolyploids. In several polyploid species studied in detail, multiple origins were found to be frequent on a local geographic scale, as well as during a short span of time. Molecular data strongly suggest that recurrent formation of polyploid species is the rule, rather than the exception. In addition, molecular data indicate that recurrent formation of polyploids has important genetic consequences, introducing considerable genetic variation from diploid progenitors into polyploid derivatives. Molecular data also suggest a much more important role for natural autopolyploids than has been historically envisioned. In contrast to the longstanding view of autopolyploidy as being rare, molecular data continue to reveal steadily increasing numbers of well-documented autoploids having tetrasomic or higher-level polysomic inheritance. Although autopolyploidy undoubtedly occurs much less frequently than allopolyploidy in natural populations, it nonetheless has been a significant evolutionary mechanism. Molecular data also provide compelling genetic evidence that contradicts the traditional view of autopolyploidy as being maladaptive. Electrophoretic studies have revealed three important attributes of autopolyploids compared to their diploid progenitors: (1) enzyme multiplicity, (2) increased heterozygosity, and (3) increased allelic diversity. Genetic variability is, in fact, typically substantially higher in autopoloids than in their diploid progenitors. These genetic attributes of autopolyploids are due to polysomic inheritance and provide strong genetic arguments for the potential success of autopolyploids in nature. In addition to providing numerous important insights into the formation of polyploids and the immediate genetic consequences of polyploidy, molecular data also have been used to study the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes. Common hypotheses on the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes include (1) gene silencing, eventually leading to extensively diploidized polyploid genomes; (2) gene diversification, resulting in regulatory or functional divergence of duplicate genes; and (3) genome diversification, resulting in chromosomal repatterning. Compelling, but limited, genetic evidence for all of these factors has been obtained in molecular analyses of polyploid species. The occurrence of these processes in polyploid genomes indicates that polyploid genomes are plastic and susceptible to evolutionary change. In summary, molecular data continue to demonstrate that polyploidization and the subsequent evolution of polyploid genomes are very dynamic processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kianian, S. F., & Quiros, C. F. (1992) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00224150 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Hybrid origins of plant species
Rieseberg, L. H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359 · Cited by 1,246
Self-citationPolyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
Self-citationAdvances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation
Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Tate, J. A. (2004) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x · Cited by 720
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Rieseberg, L. H.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-273
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W1997906362
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352689309701903
- The paper
- Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., & Rieseberg, L. H. (1993). Molecular Data and the Dynamic Nature of Polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689309701903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.