Cited by 27Extraction and Separation ProcessesChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Cobalt and Nickel Recovery from Sulfate Media Containing Calcium, Manganese, and Magnesium with a Mixture of CYANEX 301 and a Trialkylamine

Fleitlikh, I. Yu., Pashkov, G. L., Grigorieva, N. A., Nikiforova, L. K., Pleshkov, M. A., Shneerson, Y. M.·2011·Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange

Abstract

Data are presented on the solvent extraction of nickel and cobalt from sulfate solutions imitating the composition of partially neutralized liquors from the leaching of oxidized nickel ores using mixtures of 0.4 M CYANEX 301 (HR) with 0.4–0.5 M C7–C9 fraction of a trialkyl amine (R′3N) as the extractant. Nickel and cobalt are efficiently extracted in the pH range 6.2–6.5 and separated from Mn, Mg, and Ca in the extraction step. The separation factors for Co and Ni are high (102–103). Due to the formation of the stable adduct [R′3NH]+[R]− between the extractant components, nickel and cobalt can be stoichiometrically stripped with H2SO4 (1.0–2.0 M), allowing the production of concentrated solutions (> 100 g/L of total Co and Ni). The nickel strip liquors contain only a small amount of free acid (pH 1.5–2.0) after purification from cobalt, so they can be further processed using traditional technologies. A proposed flowsheet for nickel and cobalt recovery from such leach liquors has the advantages of ease of production of concentrated nickel and cobalt strip liquors in sulfate media and the stability of the extractant and strip liquor to oxidation by air or oxygen compared to other variants of CYANEX 301 applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07366299.2011.595627

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interactions can occur in synergistic extraction systems such as Cyanex 272 and Alamine 336/TEHA for separation of rare earth elements, Cyanex 301 and TOA for extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II), and Cyanex 302 and Alamine 308 for separation of Nd(III) and Zn(II).

    “For instance, interactions can occur in the following synergistic extraction systems, such as Cyanex 272 and Alamine 336 / tertiary amine (TEHA, tris-2-ethylhexylamine) for the separation of rare earth elements, Cyanex 301 and TOA for the extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II), Cyanex 302 and Alamine 308 for the separation of Nd(III) and Zn(II) [16,18-21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fleitlikh, I. Y., Pashkov, G. L., Grigorieva, N. A., Nikiforova, L. K., Pleshkov, M. A., & Shneerson, Y. M.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology (RU)
  • Gipronickel Institute (RU)
Corresponding author
Grigorieva, N. A.
Venue
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange
Published
2011-01
Volume
29
Issue
5-6
Pages
782-799
ISSN
  • 0736-6299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2262
OpenAlex
W1965334031
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
cobalt recovery, nickel recovery, Cyanex 301, trialkylamines, solvent extraction, sulfate medium, cobalt-nickel separation, air oxidation resistance, flowsheets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review