Toward Biotherapeutic Product Real‐Time Quality Monitoring
Abstract
Biotherapeutics, such as those derived from monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), are industrially produced in controlled multiunit operation bioprocesses. Each unit operation contributes to the final characteristics of the bioproduct. The complexity of the bioprocesses, the cellular machinery, and the bioproduct molecules, typically leads to inherent heterogeneity and variability of the final critical quality attributes (CQAs). In order to improve process control and increase product quality assurance, online and real-time monitoring of product CQAs is most relevant. In this review, the recent advances in CQAs monitoring of biotherapeutic drugs, with emphasis on mAbs, and throughout, the different bioprocess unit operations are reviewed. Recent analytical techniques used for assessment of product-related CQAs of mAbs are considered in light of the analytical speed and ability to measure different CQAs. Furthermore, the state of art modeling approaches for CQA estimation in real-time are presented as a viable alternative for real-time bioproduct CQA monitoring under the process analytical technology and quality-by-design frameworks in the biopharmaceutical industry, which have recently been demonstrated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Therapeutic proteins are inherently complex due to their higher molecular weights, multiple post-translational modifications, higher order structure variants, and/or putative molecular interactions.
“Adding to this challenge is the inherent complexity of therapeutic proteins due to their higher molecular weights, multiple post‐translational modifications (PTMs), higher order structure variants (HOS) and/or putative molecular interactions [33].”
From Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Hybrid semi-parametric modeling in process systems engineering: Past, present and future
von Stosch, M., Oliveira, R., Peres, J., & Feyo de Azevedo, S. (2014) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.08.008 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Therapeutic protein aggregation: mechanisms, design, and control
Roberts, C. J. (2014) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.05.005 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Bioreactor monitoring with spectroscopy and chemometrics: a review
Lourenço, N. D., Lopes, J. A., Almeida, C. F., Sarraguça, M. C., & Pinheiro, H. M. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6073-9 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Soft sensors in bioprocessing: A status report and recommendations
Luttmann, R., Bracewell, D. G., Cornelissen, G., Gernaey, K. V., Glassey, J., Hass, V. C., Kaiser, C., Preusse, C., Striedner, G., & Mandenius, C. (2012) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201100506 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationClaßen, J., Aupert, F., Reardon, K. F., Solle, D., & Scheper, T. (2017) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-016-0068-x · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Mini‐review: soft sensors as means for <scp>PAT</scp> in the manufacture of bio‐therapeutics
Mandenius, C., & Gustavsson, R. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.4477 · Cited by 84 · cited 16× · see citing works
“ware sensors in PAT [157,158] as well as the drawbacks”
BackgroundInfluentialGiorgetti, J., D’Atri, V., Canonge, J., Lechner, A., Guillarme, D., Colas, O., Wagner-Rousset, E., Beck, A., Leize-Wagner, E., & François, Y.-N. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2017.09.083 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bioprocess Control: Current Progress and Future Perspectives
Rathore, A. S., Mishra, S., Nikita, S., & Priyanka, P. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11060557 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Current PAT Landscape in the Downstream Processing of Biopharmaceuticals
Sathiyapriyan, P., Mukherjee, S., Vogel, T., Essen, L., Boerema, D., Vey, M., & Kalina, U. (2025) · Analytical Science Advances · doi:10.1002/ansa.70013 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guerra, A., von Stosch, M., & Glassey, J.
- Affiliations
- School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-305
- ISSN
- 0738-8551
- 1549-7801
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Funders
- EU-Horizon 2020 Marie Curie ITN project BIORAPID (643056)
- Newcastle University
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review