Cited by 238Fault Detection and Control SystemsControl Systems and IdentificationSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Soft sensors in bioprocessing: A status report and recommendations

Open access
Luttmann, Reiner, Bracewell, Daniel G., Cornelissen, Gesine, Gernaey, Krist V., Glassey, Jarka, Hass, Volker C., Kaiser, Christian, Preusse, Christian +2 more·2012·Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

The following report with recommendations is the result of an expert panel meeting on soft sensor applications in bioprocess engineering that was organized by the Measurement, Monitoring, Modelling and Control (M3C) Working Group of the European Federation of Biotechnology ‐ Section of Biochemical Engineering Science (ESBES). The aim of the panel was to provide an update on the present status of the subject and to identify critical needs and issues for the furthering of the successful development of soft sensor methods in bioprocess engineering research and for industrial applications, in particular with focus on biopharmaceutical applications. It concludes with a set of recommendations, which highlight current prospects for the extended use of soft sensors and those areas requiring development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biot.201100506

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Designers of software sensors used in bioprocesses have to cope with variable process lengths, multiple process phases and especially faults of physical sensors used as inputs.

    “There are, naturally, shortcomings as well: designers of software sensors used in bioprocesses have to cope with variable process lengths, multiple process phases and especially faults of physical sensors used as inputs.”

    From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Luttmann et al. 2012

    Section 4, “Industrial needs and opportunities for soft sensors in biochemical engineering” (page unavailable), says soft sensors must handle drift, outliers and missing data in analytical measurements, supporting the concern about unreliable sensor inputs. The passages do not identify variable process lengths or multiple process phases as design challenges, or establish that physical-sensor faults are especially important. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Software sensors are commonly applied in all engineering disciplines, including bioprocess engineering.

    “Software sensors are commonly applied in all the engineering disciplines (automotive and aircraft control, wastewater treatment, industrial-scale chemical processes such as distillation), including bioprocess engineering (Luttmann et al. 2012).”

    From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Luttmann et al. 2012

    The passage under “Monitor variability Analytes defined Monitor deviations” says soft sensors are widely used beyond bioprocesses and names automotive and aircraft control, wastewater treatment, and industrial-scale distillation—the citing sentence’s examples. It does not establish their use in *all* engineering disciplines. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All software sensors are observers in the broad sense of the word in control theory.

    “Generally, all software sensors are observers in the broad sense of the word in control theory (Luttmann et al. 2012; Aguilar-Garnica and García-Sandoval 2015).”

    From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Luttmann et al. 2012

    Section 2 (‘What is a soft sensor? A definition’; page unavailable) describes soft sensors as using accessible data to estimate other variables and says ‘observer-based sensors’ may be an appropriate term. It does not state that all software sensors are observers in the control-theory sense; its qualified terminology does not establish that universal claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The development of software sensors can be carried out using two different types of methodologies: model-driven estimators and data-driven estimators.

    “In general, the development of software sensors can be carried out using two different types of methodologies: model-driven estimators and data-driven estimators, which are terms generally accepted in the literature (Kadlec et al. 2009; Luttmann et al. 2012).”

    From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Luttmann et al. 2012

  • In 2012, a report on soft sensors in bioprocessing was issued by the European Federation of Biotechnology, which identified critical needs and issues and concluded with a set of eight recommendations.

    “In 2012, a report on soft sensors in bioprocessing was issued by the European Federation of Biotechnology, which identified critical needs and issues for the successful development of soft sensor methods in bioprocess research and industry and concluded with a set of eight recommendations highlighting areas requiring development (Luttmann et al. 2012).”

    From Software sensors in the monitoring of microalgae cultivations (2024) · cites this paper as Luttmann et al. 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [2]2. Sonnleitner, B., Instrumentation of biotechnological pro - cesses. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 1999, 66, 1-64.
  2. [6]6. International conference on Harmonization (ICH) Docu- ment ICH Q8-Q10, 2005-2010. Available at www.ich.org.
  3. [7]7. Glassey J., Gernaey K.V., Oliveria R., Striedner G. et al., PAT for biopharmaceuticals. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6, 369-377.
  4. [8]8. Mandenius C.-F., Graumann K., Schultz T. W., Premsteller A., et al., Quality-by-Design (QbD) for biotechnology-relat- ed phamaceuticals. Biotechnol. J. 2009, 4, 600-609.
  5. [26]26. Kaiser, C., Carvell, J. P., Luttmann, R., A sensitive, compact, in situ biomass measurement system. BioProc. Intern. 2007, 5, 52-56.
  6. [35]35. Bracewell D.G., Brown R.A., Hoare M., Addressing a whole bioprocess in real-time using an optical biosensor -from a recombinant E. coli host. Bioproc. Biosys. Eng. 2004, 26, 271- 282.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luttmann, R., Bracewell, D. G., Cornelissen, G., Gernaey, K. V., Glassey, J., Hass, V. C., Kaiser, C., Preusse, C., Striedner, G., & Mandenius, C.
Affiliations
  • HAW Hamburg (DE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Hochschule Bremen (DE)
  • Siemens (Germany) (DE)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Mandenius, Carl‐Fredrik
Venue
Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-05
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
1040-1048
ISSN
  • 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-7314
OpenAlex
W1976208842
Cited by
238
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
17.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of Futwangen University of Applied Sciences (Furtwangen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
soft sensors, bioprocess monitoring, bioprocess engineering, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, process analytical technology, process control, expert panel recommendations
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Chemical Engineering, Models, Theoretical, Software, Biosensing Techniques, Bioreactors, Bioengineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review