Cited by 42HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses

Embodied Work: Insider Perspectives on the Work of HIV/AIDS Peer Counselors

Open access
Hilfinger Messias, DeAnne K., Moneyham, Linda, Vyavaharkar, Medha, Murdaugh, Carolyn, Phillips, Kenneth D.·2009·Health Care for Women International

Abstract

Our aim in this study was to explore HIV/AIDS peer counseling from the perspective of women actively engaged in this work within the context of a community-based program in rural areas of the southeastern United States. Based on this research we suggest that the embodied work of HIV/AIDS peer counselors is constructed around their personal identities and experiences. This work involves gaining entry to other HIV-positive women's lives, building relationships, drawing on personal experiences, facing issues of fear and stigma, tailoring peer counseling for diversity, balancing risks and benefits, and terminating relationships. Peer counselors recognize the personal and collective value of their work, which, like much of women's work within the context of family and community, lacks public visibility and acknowledgment. We discuss implications for the training and support of peer-based interventions for HIV and other women's health issues across diverse contexts and settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07399330902928766

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilfinger Messias, D. K., Moneyham, L., Vyavaharkar, M., Murdaugh, C., & Phillips, K. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Health Care for Women International
Published
2009-06-22
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
570-592
ISSN
  • 0739-9332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4665
OpenAlex
W2121076240
Cited by
42
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Care For Women International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01nr004956-08)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (1 R01 NR04956, R01 NR004956)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Keywords
peer counselors, embodied work, women's employment, stigma, fear, personal identity, relationship building, community-based programs, rural communities, women's health, peer intervention, training and support, recognition of women's work
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Community Health Services, Counseling, Fear, Female, Humans, Job Description, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Support, Stereotyping, Women, Women's Health Services, Southeastern United States, Nursing Methodology Research, HIV Infections, Rural Health Services, Feminism, Narration, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review