Cited by 26Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

From Suicide Survivor to Peer Counselor: Breaking the Silence of Suicide Bereavement

Oulanova, Olga, Moodley, Roy, Séguin, Monique·2014·OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying

Abstract

This study sought to explore the phenomenon of peer counseling in suicide bereavement by addressing the question, what are the lived experiences of suicide survivors who become peer counselors? Participants were 15 individuals bereaved through suicide who had been volunteering with others bereaved in the same manner. This research employed the interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach to provide a detailed description of participants' journeys that went from experiencing the suicide of a loved one, to the decision to become a peer counselor, to, finally, providing support to other survivors. The findings suggest that participants understand the provision of peer counseling as a transformative process. Being a peer counselor means actively challenging the silence around suicide by speaking out about suicide-related issues and offering other survivors a safe space to share their stories. The broader implications of these findings for suicide postvention research and clinical practice are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/om.69.2.d

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence that low-threshold services such as peer-counseling or online support groups are suitable for addressing the needs of stigmatized survivors.

    “There is some evidence that low-threshold services such as peer-counseling or online support groups are suitable for addressing the needs of stigmatized survivors [36,70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oulanova, O., Moodley, R., & Séguin, M.
Affiliations
  • Psychologist in Private Practice, Ontario
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Oulanova, Olga
Venue
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2014-10
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
151-168
ISSN
  • 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3764
OpenAlex
W2118245219
Cited by
26
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
suicide bereavement, peer counseling, suicide survivors, lived experience, suicide postvention, bereavement support, volunteering, transformative processes
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Bereavement, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Survivors, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review