The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review
Open accessAbstract
We review the OR/MS literature on supply chain disruptions in order to take stock of the research to date and to provide an overview of the research questions that have been addressed. We first place disruptions in the context of other forms of supply uncertainty and discuss common modeling approaches. We then discuss nearly 150 scholarly works on the topic, organized into six categories: evaluating supply disruptions; strategic decisions; sourcing decisions; contracts and incentives; inventory; and facility location. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x · Cited by 2,088
The Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Discrete Optimization
Kleywegt, A. J., Shapiro, A., & Homem-de-Mello, T. (2002) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/s1052623499363220 · Cited by 1,983
Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004) · MIT Sloan Management Review · Cited by 1,860
Foundations of Inventory Management
Zipkin, P. H. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,854
On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks
Tomlin, B. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515 · Cited by 1,700
Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675560500405584 · Cited by 1,336
Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x · Cited by 1,303
Facility location : applications and theory
Drezner, Z., & Hamacher, H. W. (2001) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 1,281
Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem
Clark, A. J., & Scarf, H. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0265 · Cited by 1,256
Cited by
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1387680 · Cited by 895
Diez-Olivan, A., Del Ser, J., Galar, D., & Sierra, B. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005 · Cited by 633
Ivanov, D. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1890852 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B.
- Venue
- IIE Transactions
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-12-15
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-109
- ISSN
- 0740-817X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-8830
- OpenAlex
- W3121568017
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 195.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0740817x.2015.1067735
- The paper
- Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016). OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review. IIE Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817x.2015.1067735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
