The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm
Abstract
This paper investigates the long‐term stock price effects and equity risk effects of supply chain disruptions based on a sample of 827 disruption announcements made during 1989–2000. Stock price effects are examined starting one year before through two years after the disruption announcement date. Over this time period the average abnormal stock returns of firms that experienced disruptions is nearly –40%. Much of this underperformance is observed in the year before the announcement, the day of the announcement, and the year after the announcement. Furthermore, the evidence indicates that firms do not quickly recover from the negative effects of disruptions. The equity risk of the firm also increases significantly around the announcement date. The equity risk in the year after the announcement is 13.50% higher when compared to the equity risk in the year before the announcement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x · Cited by 11,584
Improved Methods for Tests of Long‐Run Abnormal Stock Returns
Lyon, J. D., Barber, B. M., & Tsai, C. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00101 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review
Snyder, L. V., Atan, Z., Peng, P., Rong, Y., Schmitt, A. J., & Sinsoysal, B. (2016) · IIE Transactions · doi:10.1080/0740817x.2015.1067735 · Cited by 854
An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability
Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2006) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004 · Cited by 787
Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review
Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541211246558 · Cited by 750
Metadata
- Authors
- Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-52
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W2141640905
- Cited by
- 1,303
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 85.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
- The paper
- Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
