Cited by 27Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Law and EvidenceDeception detection and forensic psychology

The Achilles Heel of Police Body-Worn Cameras: Understanding the Factors That Influence Variation in Body-Worn Camera Activation

Open access
Katz, Charles M., Huff, Jessica·2023·Justice Quarterly

Abstract

While body-worn cameras (BWCs) are increasingly becoming commonplace in police organizations, researchers and policymakers still know little about their implementation in the field and the factors related to their actual use. Using data collected from 146,601 incidents in Phoenix, Arizona, the present study examines the prevalence and correlates of BWC activation. In doing so, we examine the impact of incident-level factors, officer characteristics, neighborhood context, and changes in BWC activation policy on whether an officer who is assigned to wear a BWC activates their camera during a police-citizen contact. Cross-classified models are used to simultaneously assess the influence of factors at multiple levels of explanation. Our analysis suggests that a wide variety of individual, situational, organizational, and neighborhood factors are related to an officer’s decision to activate their camera. BWC policy that confines, structures, and checks officer activation has a robust impact on an officer’s decision to activate their BWC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07418825.2022.2071325

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, C. M., & Huff, J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, Charles M.
Venue
Justice Quarterly
Published
2022-05-13
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
315-336
ISSN
  • 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9109
OpenAlex
W4280598570
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
18.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons@UNO (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Bureau of Justice Assistance
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police-citizen contact, police policy, neighborhood context, police oversight, cross-classified models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review