The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study
Abstract
:Organizations are investing ever-increasing amounts in information technology (11).However, the existing literature provides little evidence of a relationship between IT investment and organizational strategic and economic performance. The exploratory research reported here appears to be the rust to relate comprehensive sets of IT investment measures to organizational strategic and economic performance measures. Although the individual IT investment variables were found to be only weakly related to organizational strategic and economic performance, they were significantly related to performance when grouped and analyzed by means of canonical correlation. More specifically, canonical results suggest that organizational strategic and economic performance measures such as sales by employee, return on sales, sales by total assets, return on investment, and market to book value are affected by IT investment measures such as IT budget as percentage of revenue, the percentage of IT budget spent on training of employees, number of PCs per employee, and IT value as a percentage of revenue. The organizational performance measure growth in revenue and IT investment measure percentage of IT budget spent on staff were not significantly related to other measures and therefore were not indicated to be useful for investigating possible effects of IT investment on organizational strategic and economic performance. Finally, a model based on these results is suggested. The model depicts a framework for management evaluation of the relationship between IT investment and organizational performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148626 · Cited by 2,822
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238
ZHU, K., KRAEMER, K. L., & DEDRICK, J. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045797 · Cited by 775
Enterprise resource planning systems: comparing firm performance of adopters and nonadopters
Hunton, J. E., Lippincott, B., & Reck, J. L. (2003) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s1467-0895(03)00008-3 · Cited by 474
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahmood, M. A., & Mann, G. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-122
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W74363291
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517992
- The paper
- Mahmood, M. A., & Mann, G. J. (1993). Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.