Cited by 2,822Innovation and Knowledge ManagementInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions For Future Research1

Wade, Michael, Hulland, John·2004·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Information systems researchers have a long tradition of drawing on theories from disciplines such as economics, computer science, psychology, and general management and using them in their own research. Because of this, the information systems field has become a rich tapestry of theoretical and conceptual foundations. As new theories are brought into the field, particularly theories that have become dominant in other areas, there may be a benefit in pausing to assess their use and contribution in an IS context. The purpose of this paper is to explore and critically evaluate use of the resource-based view of the firm (RBV) by IS researchers. The paper provides a brief review of resource-based theory and then suggests extensions to make the RBV more useful for empirical IS research. First, a typology of key IS resources is presented, and these are then described using six traditional resource attributes. Second, we emphasize the particular importance of looking at both resource complementarity and moderating factors when studying IS resource effects on firm performance. Finally, we discuss three considerations that IS researchers need to address when using the RBV empirically. Eight sets of propositions are advanced to help guide future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/25148626

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wade, M., & Hulland, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
107-142
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W1485916023
Cited by
2,822
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 132 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 181 · 2014: 171 · 2013: 188 · 2012: 189
FWCI
235.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
resource-based view, information systems resources, resource complementarity, moderators, firm performance, resource attributes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review