Cited by 277Business Process Modeling and AnalysisOrganizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and Change

Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management

Kettinger, William J., Grover, Varun·1995·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

(1995). Special Section: Toward a Theory of Business Process Change Management. Journal of Management Information Systems: Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 9-30.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518068

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kettinger, W. J., & Grover, V.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
1995-06
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
9-30
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W1560403024
Cited by
277
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
business process change, change management, organizational change, information system implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review