The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study
Abstract
The recent proliferation of information technology designed to support or enhance an individual professional's task performance has made the investigation of technology acceptance increasingly challenging and significant. This study investigates technology acceptance by individual professionals by examining physicians' decisions to accept telemedicine technology. Synthesized from relevant prior research, a generic research framework was built to provide a necessary foundation upon which a research model for telemedicine technology acceptance by physicians could be developed. The research model was then empirically examined, using data collected from more than 400 physicians practicing in public tertiary hospitals in Hong Kong. Results of the study suggest several areas where individual "professionals" might subtly differ in their technology acceptance decision-making, as compared with end users and business managers in ordinary business settings. Specifically, physicians appeared to be fairly pragmatic, largely anchoring their acceptance decisions in the usefulness of the technology rather than in its ease of use. When making decisions to accept a technology, physicians expressed considerable concerns about the compatibility of the technology with their practices, placed less importance on controlling technology operations, and attached limited weight to peers' opinions about using the technology. Based on results obtained from this study, the initially proposed framework for technology acceptance by individual professionals was revised to a "hierarchical, three-layer" structure with the individual context at the inner core, the implementation context on the outermost layer, and the technological context residing in the middle. Implications for information systems research and telemedicine management practice that have emerged from the study's findings are also discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In opposition to that hypothesis, in three of four studies with non-significant SN effects, IT use was voluntary [49,97] or was perceived to be voluntary [108], and IT use was mandatory in two of four studies with significant SN effects [102,110].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“For example, the common addition of variables related to compatibility between the health IT and clinical work processes in the reviewed studies [48, 49, 98, 103, 105, 106, 109] is in line with growing interest in the concept of “fit” as a critical need for successful IT design [131, 132], especially in health care [21, 28, 57, 62, 72, 100, 133-135].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Mathieson, K. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.173 · Cited by 4,216
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 705
An Integrated Analysis of Technology Acceptance Behaviour Models: Comparison of Three Major Models
Jen, W., Lu, T., & Liu, P.-T. (2009) · doi:10.6131/misr.200909_15(1).0004 · Cited by 30
Exploring adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: Applications in the medical industry
Başoğlu, N., Göken, M., Dabić, M., Güngör, D. Ö., & Daim, T. U. (2018) · Frontiers of Engineering Management · doi:10.15302/j-fem-2018056 · Cited by 31
Maarop, N. B., & Win, K. T. (2011) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9766-2 · Cited by 30
Walczak, R., Kludacz-Alessandri, M., & Hawrysz, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710937 · Cited by 31
Parikh, A., Patel, J. D., & Jaiswal, A. (2021) · DECISION · doi:10.1007/s40622-020-00266-2 · Cited by 33
Gurupur, V. P., Shettian, K., Xu, P., Hines, S., Desselles, M. L., Dhawan, M., Wan, T. T. H., Raffenaud, A., & Anderson, L. (2016) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458216639740 · Cited by 28
Khasawneh, M. H. A. (2015) · The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · doi:10.4172/1204-5357.1000128 · Cited by 28
Indonesian Consumers’ Intention of Adopting Islamic Financial Technology Services
Purwantini, A. H., Athief, F. H. N., & Waharini, F. M. (2020) · Shirkah Journal of Economics and Business · doi:10.22515/shirkah.v5i2.304 · Cited by 27
Abdool, S., Abdallah, S., Akhlaq, S., & Razzak, H. A. (2021) · Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · doi:10.18295/squmj.2021.21.02.008 · Cited by 34
Shi, J., Yan, X., Wang, M., Lei, P., & Yu, G.-J. (2021) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2021.745687 · Cited by 23
Esmaeilzadeh, P., Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N., & Nezakhati, H. (2011) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_3 · Cited by 27
A study of executives' use of biometrics: an application of theory of planned behaviour
Seyal, A. H., & Turner, R. (2012) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2012.659217 · Cited by 27
Sezgın, E., & Özkan, S. (2015) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.12.006 · Cited by 27
Assessing Mobile Learning Readiness in Saudi Arabia Higher Education: An Empirical Study
Aljuaid, N. M. (2014) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2014.2.2.26 · Cited by 27
Exploring determinants in deploying mobile commerce technology: Amman stock exchange
Yaseen, S. G., & Zayed, S. (2010) · International Conference on Information Society · doi:10.1109/i-society16502.2010.6018787 · Cited by 27
Empirical Analysis of Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Sustainable Agricultural Practices
Syan, A. S., Kumar, V., Sandhu, V., & Hundal, B. S. (2019) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation · doi:10.1177/2319510x19848857 · Cited by 26
Evidence for Acceptance of Ride-Hailing Services in Iran
Akbari, M., Seyyedamiri, N., Zúñiga, M. Á., Padash, H., & Shakiba, H. (2020) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/0361198120942224 · Cited by 28
Evaluation of Healthcare IT Applications: The User Acceptance Perspective
Zheng, K., Padman, R., Johnson, M. P., & Diamond, H. S. (2007) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72375-2_4 · Cited by 26
Alharbi, A. (2011) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2011.021003 · Cited by 26
A Study of eHealth from the Perspective of Social Sciences
Uribe-Toril, J., Ruiz–Real, J. L., & Soriano, B. J. N. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9020108 · Cited by 27
Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Voet, T., Sijnave, B., Gemmel, P., Duyck, W., van Braak, J., & Duyck, P. (2013) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb-53-2-15 · Cited by 25
Hamm, J., Money, A., & Atwal, A. (2017) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.7161 · Cited by 25
Schroeder, T., Seaman, K. L., Nguyen, A., Gewald, H., & Georgiou, A. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107865 · Cited by 24
Prikshat, V., Kumar, S., Patel, P., & Varma, A. (2024) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-04-2023-0303 · Cited by 40
Acceptance of the German e-mental health portal www.psychenet.de: an online survey
Tlach, L., Thiel, J., Härter, M. C., Liebherz, S., & Dirmaier, J. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2093 · Cited by 24
Trust Role in Acceptance of Digital Banking in Indonesia
Kusumawati, N., & Rinaldi, A. A. (2020) · International Journal of Trade Economics and Finance · doi:10.18178/ijtef.2020.11.1.659 · Cited by 24
Shaw, N. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.007 · Cited by 27
Impact of network effects and diffusion channels on home computer adoption
Peng, G., Fan, M., & Dey, D. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.01.004 · Cited by 23
Understanding individual investor's behavior with financial information disclosed on the web sites
Lee, K. C., Chung, N., & Kang, I. (2008) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290601138146 · Cited by 23
Prisoners as users of digital health care and social welfare services: a Finnish attitude survey
Rantanen, T., Järveläinen, E., & Leppälahti, T. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115528 · Cited by 22
Technology in families and the clinical encounter: results of a cross‐national survey
Bacigalupe, G., Cámara, M., & Buffardi, L. E. (2014) · Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12042 · Cited by 30
Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: a parsimonious and actionable model
Holahan, P. J., Lesselroth, B., Adams, K. A., Wang, K., & Church, V. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu043 · Cited by 22
(2012) · Academy of Information and Management Sciences journal · Cited by 22
Vidal‐Alaball, J., Seguí, F. L., Domingo, J. L. G., Flores‐Mateo, G., Valmaña, G. S., Ruiz‐Comellas, A., Marin-Gomez, F. X., & Cuyàs, F. G. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17114092 · Cited by 22
Raitoharju, R. (2014) · UTUPub (University of Turku) · Cited by 22
Some non-technology implications for wider application of robots assisting older people
Tiwari, P., Warren, J., Day, K., & McDonald, B. A. (2010) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 21
Technology Adoption Theories and Models
Khan, R., & Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2020) · Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation/Advances in science, technology & innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50112-9_5 · Cited by 17
Mogharbel, A., Dowding, D., & Ainsworth, J. D. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/22923 · Cited by 20
Kim, E. D., Kuan, K. K. Y., Vaghasiya, M. R., Penm, J. H.-D., Gunja, N., Amrani, R. E., & Poon, S. K.-S. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2117081 · Cited by 26
Global Telemedicine and eHealth Updates: Knowledge Resources
Jordanova, M. M., & Lievens, F. (2010) · Cited by 21
The Relationships among Trust, E-satisfaction, E-loyalty, and Customer Online Behaviors
Tang, T.-W., Tsai, C.-H., & Wu, W.-P. (2005) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 21
The role of theories in social marketing in predicting physical activity behavior among the youth
Tweneboah‐Koduah, E. Y., Adams, M., & Acheampong, G. (2019) · Journal of Social Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsocm-01-2018-0005 · Cited by 21
Chen, Y., Li, X., Li, Q., & Li, W. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-04-2022-0234 · Cited by 20
Acceptance of Educational Technology: Field Studies of Asynchronous Participatory Examinations
Wu, D., Hiltz, S. R., & Bieber, M. P. (2010) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02621 · Cited by 20
Izuagbe, R., Hamzat, S. A., & Joseph, E. I. (2016) · Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice · doi:10.1633/jistap.2016.4.1.3 · Cited by 20
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 20
Examining Gender Effects in Technology Acceptance by Arabian Workers: A Survey Study
Chen, H., Al‐Gahtani, S. S., & Hu, P. J. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 19
Self-citationFuture use intentions versus intensity of use: An analysis of corporate technology acceptance
Ortega, B. H., Martínez, J. J., & Martín, M. J. (2008) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.12.002 · Cited by 19
Diabetes Educators’ Intended and Reported Use of Common Diabetes-Related Technologies
James, S., Perry, L., Gallagher, R. D., & LOWE, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816646798 · Cited by 19
Akinbode, M., Adegbuyi, O. A., & Agboola, M. G. (2018) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1145/3183586.3183594 · Cited by 22
Professionals' use of ICT in hospitals: the interplay between institutional and rational factors
Gastaldi, L., Radaelli, G., Lettieri, E., Luzzini, D., & Mariano Corso, A. (2019) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2019.099768 · Cited by 19
Sun, S.-L., Hwang, H., Dutta, B., & Peng, M.-H. (2019) · Libyan Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1080/19932820.2019.1648963 · Cited by 19
A Profile of Innovative Women Entrepreneurs
Idris, A. (2009) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v1n2p3 · Cited by 19
Hamm, J., Money, A., & Atwal, A. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103135 · Cited by 20
Wearable discontinuance: Pathways in the volitional information systems discontinuance process
Dhir, A., Nijjer, S., Luo, X. R., & Kaur, P. (2024) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2024.104038 · Cited by 22
The role of perceived usefulness and attitude on electronic health record acceptance
Gajanayake, R., Sahama, T. R., & Iannella, R. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2013.6720706 · Cited by 19
The Acceptance of Smart Home Technology
Gross, C., Siepermann, M., & Lackes, R. (2020) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61140-8_1 · Cited by 18
Day, K., & Song, N. (2017) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v24i3.916 · Cited by 18
Exploring Factors That Affect Teleconsultation Adoption: In The Case Of Malaysia
Maarop, N. B., Win, K. T., Masrom, M. B., & Singh, S. S. H. (2011) · Research Online (University of Wollongong) · Cited by 18
Insights into quality professionals' adoption of Quality 4.0 in the high-tech industry
Rogala, P., Brzozowski, T. T., & Pankowska, M. B. (2024) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-08-2023-0263 · Cited by 17
Chaudhry, S. (2018) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1364 · Cited by 21
IT Use and Job Outcomes: A Longitudinal Field Study of Technology Contingencies
Venkatesh, V., Tech, V., Speier, C., Aljafari, R., Tech, V., & Bala, H. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00760 · Cited by 17
Clinical information system post-adoption evaluation at the georges pompidou university hospital.
Palm, J.-M., Dart, T., Dupuis, I., Leneveut, L., & Patrice Degoulet, A. (2010) · PubMed Central · Cited by 17
A comprehensive adoption model of M-government services among citizens in developing countries
Sultana, M. R., Ahlan, A. R., & Habibullah, M. S. (2015) · Cited by 17
Adversarial factors in multi-stakeholders’ engagement of global-IT projects
Mysore, K., Kirytopoulos, K. A., Ahn, S., & Ma, T. (2019) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-01-2019-0014 · Cited by 18
Managing paradoxical tensions in the development of a telemedicine system
Agarwal, N., Soh, C., & Yeow, A. Y. K. (2022) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100393 · Cited by 22
Emaeilzadeh, P., Sambasivan, M., & Nezakati, H. (2014) · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) · doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v3i2.98 · Cited by 22
What Drives People to Adopt Grocery Apps? The Moderating Role of Household Size
Chakraborty, D., Bhatnagar, S. B., Biswas, W., & Khatua, A. K. (2022) · Business Perspectives and Research · doi:10.1177/22785337221091640 · Cited by 11
Physicians' Behavior Intentions Regarding the Use of Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study
Han, S., Mustonen, P., Seppänen, M., & Kallio, M. (2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 16
Hwang, H., Dutta, B., & Chang, H.-C. (2019) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1695718 · Cited by 16
Hoang, Y. H., Nguyen, D. T. T., Tran, L. H. T., Nguyen, N. T. H., & Vu, N. B. T. (2021) · Data Science in Finance and Economics · doi:10.3934/dsfe.2021005 · Cited by 17
Chen, H.-J., & Lu, J.-T. (2016) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2016.1155949 · Cited by 15
Marandu, E. E., Makudza, F., & Ngwenya, S. N. (2019) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.18.6.7 · Cited by 16
Examination of Hedonism in TAM Research
Ayyagari, R. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 16
Esmaeilzadeh, P., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2010) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16397-5_2 · Cited by 15
Alves, J. M., Savaris, A., von Wangenheim, C. G., & von Wangenheim, A. (2016) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms.2016.51 · Cited by 15
Vadillo, L., Martín-Ruiz, M.-L., Pau, I., Melguizo, R. C., & Valero, M. Á. (2017) · Journal of Sensors · doi:10.1155/2017/8972350 · Cited by 15
Informed collaboration in health care: An embedded‐cases study in geriatric telepsychiatry
Hansen, S., Gogan, J. L., Baxter, R. J., & Garfield, M. J. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12218 · Cited by 17
Incorporating digital self-services into integrated mental health care: a physician’s perspective
Taiminen, H. M., Saraniemi, S., & Parkinson, J. E. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-02-2017-0158 · Cited by 15
The impact of cultural values on email acceptance : evidence from the PRC
Huang, L. (2003) · doi:10.14793/cds_etd.6 · Cited by 15
Tarhini, A. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2725438 · Cited by 15
Innovation cognizance and acceptance: The case of electric vehicles adoption in Ontario, Canada
Singh, R., Walsh, P. R., & Goodfield, J. (2021) · Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.24840/2183-0606_009.001_0005 · Cited by 14
Exploring physical therapists’ perceptions of mobile application usage utilizing the FITT framework
Noblin, A. M., Shettian, M., Cortelyou-Ward, K. H., & Dugre, J. S. (2016) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2016.1178118 · Cited by 13
Al-Somali, S. A., & Baghabra, H. (2016) · International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing · doi:10.4018/ijcac.2016070104 · Cited by 14
Drivers of Ar-Rahnu (pawn) acceptance: Malaysian evidence
Thaker, H. M. T., Khaliq, A., Thaker, M. A. M. T., Pitchay, A. A., & Sakaran, K. C. (2020) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-08-2019-0161 · Cited by 14
Rokhim, R., Mayasari, I., & Wulandari, P. (2021) · Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1108/jrme-01-2020-0013 · Cited by 14
Oderanti, F. O., & Li, F. (2016) · International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management · doi:10.1504/ijhtm.2016.084128 · Cited by 14
Fleming, M. L., Hatfield, M. D., Wattana, M. K., & Todd, K. H. (2014) · Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.3109/15360288.2013.879242 · Cited by 14
Chand, P., Tarei, P. K., Gangadhari, R. K., & Mikalef, P. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3276779 · Cited by 13
Understanding the Motivations for Continuance Usage of Mobile Apps
Correia, R., & Tam, C. (2024) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2024.2302001 · Cited by 14
Exploring the Differences in Information Technology Acceptance between Healthcare Professionals
Raitoharju, R., & Laine, M. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 13
Esmaeilzadeh, P., & Sambasivan, M. (2012) · Management · doi:10.5923/j.mm.20120205.04 · Cited by 12
Influences of contextual variables on the intention to use technology in education
Teo, T. P. (2013) · Campus-Wide Information Systems · doi:10.1108/10650741311306282 · Cited by 13
San, A. N. C., & Yee, C. J. (2013) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · Cited by 13
Bakke, S., & Henry, R. M. (2015) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00075 · Cited by 13
Integrated model for understanding Indian physicians’ internet usage pattern: An empirical approach
Patwardhan, A. A., Pandey, N., & Dhume, S. M. (2016) · International Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.1080/20479700.2016.1270385 · Cited by 15
Exploring adoption of smart glasses: Applications in medical industry
Göken, M., Başoğlu, N., & Dabić, M. (2016) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · doi:10.1109/picmet.2016.7806835 · Cited by 13
Khakurel, J., Immonen, M., Porras, J., & Knutas, A. (2019) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3316782.3321527 · Cited by 14
Organizational commitment and users’ perception of ease of use: a study among bank managers
Vella, J. M., Caruana, A., & PITT, L. F. (2013) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/02621711311326356 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 191-229
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1601464326
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 39.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, telemedicine, physicians, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, technology compatibility, peer influence, Hong Kong hospitals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
