Cited by 20Technology Adoption and User BehaviourMobile and Web ApplicationsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Exploring customers' switching from native to lightweight apps: a push–pull–mooring framework perspective

Chen, Yuan, Li, Xiaodong, Li, Qi, Li, Wenjie·2022·Industrial Management & Data Systems

Abstract

Purpose: Lightweight apps such as WeChat mini programs (WMPs) are an emerging mobile channel (m-channel) touchpoint that have gained remarkable popularity among consumers. Despite the focus of migration research on traditional m-channel touchpoints (e.g. native apps and mobile websites), but few researchers have examined why consumers switch from native to lightweight apps. Drawing on the push-pull-mooring framework, this study aims to identify the key factors influencing consumers' switching related to lightweight apps. Design/methodology/approach: The data were collected using a questionnaire survey of 416 WMP consumers and the proposed model was analyzed through structural equation modeling. Findings: The results show that the push effect, specifically, high privacy concern, nudges consumers away from native apps, whereas the pull effects, including relative ease of use, convenience of access and exit and socially-oriented interaction, entice consumers to lightweight apps. Further, consumer switching intention is influenced by habit and perceived technology control, both of which reflect the mooring effects. Switching intention also stands as an important precedent of actual behavior. Originality/value: This study is among the first theoretical explorations of consumer switching across m-channel touchpoints in the context of mobile commerce. For information system practice, these findings provide new insights for both incumbent providers and newcomers on how to retain existing shoppers as well as attract potential shoppers effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/imds-04-2022-0234

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PPM has been widely adopted to examine user switching behavior in information systems research.

    “PPM has been widely adopted to examine user switching behavior in information systems research, such as user switching between social networking sites (Chang et al., 2014) and user switching between mobile apps (Chen et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Li, X., Li, Q., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Wuhu University (CN)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2022-09-08
Volume
122
Issue
12
Pages
2633-2656
ISSN
  • 0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5783
OpenAlex
W4294769763
Cited by
20
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Management & Data Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
customer switching, WeChat mini-program, native mobile applications, push-pull-mooring framework, mobile commerce, privacy concerns, nudging, habit, switching intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review