Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media
Open accessAbstract
Not only is social media a new channel to obtain financial market information, it has also become a venue for investors to share and exchange investment ideas. We examine the performance consequences of providing monetary incentive to both existing and new amateur analysts on social media and its implications for online investor communities. We find that monetary incentive is effective in increasing the amount of content output and generating more interest from the community, but it leads to neither better nor worse stock recommendations. Additional analysis suggests that monetary incentive results in wider stock and industry coverage, a sign of increased content diversity. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of monetary incentive in stimulating the sharing of value-relevant information by investors in social media communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have not consistently shown that the quality of content changes as a result of revenue sharing.
“previous studies have not consistently shown that the quality of content changes as a result of revenue sharing”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2019
Monetary incentives seem to increase the number of stock recommendations but reduce content contribution in online review communities.
“Monetary incentives seem to increase the number of stock recommendations (Chen et al. 2019) but reduce content contribution in online review communities (Sun et al. 2017).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2019
Incentivisation does not primarily affect the quality of content but its supply.
“Our data demonstrate that incentivisation does not primarily affect the quality of content but its supply (cf. Chen et al. 2019; Liu and Feng 2021).”
From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2019
Cites
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although economic theories suggest that an increase in extrinsic rewards provided by activity can improve the effort and performance of participants, some studies [12, 14] show that contingent rewards can also be counter-”
SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING
Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x · Cited by 6,238 · see citing works
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206 · see citing works
Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market
TETLOCK, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x · Cited by 4,827 · see citing works
Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All*
Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300554917 · Cited by 2,175 · see citing works
Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted Through Social Media
Chen, H., De, P., Hu, Y. (., & Hwang, B.-H. (2014) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu001 · Cited by 1,251 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hödl, T., & Myrach, T. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00808-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Beyond Money: Incentive Effects of Tokenized Ownership on User Contribution in <scp>DAOs</scp>
Chen, K., Fan, Y., Fang, Y., & Luo, X. (. (2025) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1351 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, H., Hu, Y. J., & Huang, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 391-417
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2902376200
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- International Conference on Information Systems
- Funders
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (11531516)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Keywords
- financial incentives, social media, analyst recommendations, value-relevant information, information sharing, financial market information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review