Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19Outsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementSoftware Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlling Technical Debt Remediation in Outsourced Enterprise Systems Maintenance: An Empirical Analysis

Ramasubbu, Narayan, Kemerer, Chris F.·2021·Journal of Management Information Systems

Abstract

Technical debt refers to maintenance obligations that stem from violations of established standards during the development and subsequent maintenance of enterprise systems. Technical debt remediation is particularly challenging in the outsourcing context due to information asymmetry between client and vendor teams. Control balancing—the periodic adjustments to the control configurations of outsourced projects—has been proposed as a process to help mitigate these information asymmetry challenges. Using data collected from 1,824 real-world projects, we tested to what extent control balancing improves the remediation of technical debt. After controlling for a number of technical and environmental factors, including system size, system lifespan, and contract parameters, we find that control balancing can benefit technical debt remediation, but primarily when processes for migrating technical debt-laden systems to new technological platforms have been identified. We highlight the role of technical debt in influencing the effects of relational flexibility in inter-firm engagements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07421222.2021.1870377

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Carmel E., 2010, workflow in global software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 17
  2. 10.5465/254981 · DOI
  3. Mangi L., 2016, Best practices for contracting and managing outsourced software factories
  4. 10.1509/jm.74.2.105 · DOI

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Ramasubbu, N., & Kemerer, C. F.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kemerer, Chris F.
Venue
Journal of Management Information Systems
Published
2021-01-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
4-28
ISSN
  • 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-928X
OpenAlex
W3151948865
Cited by
17
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
technical debt, software maintenance, software outsourcing, information asymmetry, enterprise systems, inter-firm relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.