The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control
Abstract
In today's competitive environment, an increasing number of firms are building common information systems, which will be deployed globally, to support their strategic globalization initiatives. These systems are designed to meet the requirements of a diverse set of stakeholders with different business needs, priorities, and objectives. One managerial tool for addressing and reconciling such differences is control, which encompasses all attempts to motivate individuals to act in a manner that is consistent with organizational objectives. This paper examines two research questions. How do stakeholders exercise control during different phases of large IS projects? Why do control choices change across project phases? Results of two case studies suggest control is exercised differently for each phase. During the initial phase of a project, control is exercised as “collective sensemaking,” in which both IS and business stakeholders utilize mostly informal mechanisms of control. During development, “technical winnowing” of mechanisms occurs such that control is vested primarily in IS managers, who structure hierarchical relationships with subordinates and who rely extensively on formal control mechanisms. Both IS and business stakeholders employ formal and informal mechanisms during implementation to exercise control as “collaborative coordinating.” The results also suggest that changes in control choices from one project phase to another are triggered by factors in the project, stakeholder, and global contexts. As factors change across phases, so too do control choices. Further, problems that surface in one project phase trigger changes to controls in subsequent phases. These findings are integrated into a model of the dynamics of control. Implications of these results are drawn, and directions for future research are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161646 · Cited by 1,105
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Ambrosio J., 1996, Information Technology in a Global Business Environment, 303
- 10.1016/0361-3682(88)90016-5 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119 · DOI
- Carmel E., 1999, Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones
- 10.1287/isre.14.3.291.16563 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/249722 · DOI
- Collins R. W., 1999, Crossing Boundaries: The Deployment of Global IT Solutions
- Crisp C. B., 2002, Acad. Management Annual Meeting
- 10.2307/259291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/249433 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298805200303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517901 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00050-1 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.7.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1287/isre.8.3.215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0963-8687(98)00031-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00070-7 · DOI
- 10.2307/259349 · DOI · Paper page
- Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
- 10.2307/249561 · DOI
- Miles M. B., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
- 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045774 · DOI
- O'Brien J. A., Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Business Enterprise
- 10.2307/255753 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2392231 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.1978.4294895 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1172 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb01628.x · DOI
- 10.2307/256375 · DOI · Paper page
- Strauss A., 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
- 10.2307/249631 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00030-5 · DOI
Cited by
The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1,941
Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606068338 · Cited by 219
Seidel, S., & Urquhart, C. (2013) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2013.17 · Cited by 96
Cram, W. A., & Wiener, M. (2020) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04604 · Cited by 56
The role of formal controls in facilitating information system diffusion
Abubakre, M. A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Coombs, C. R. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.04.005 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirsch, L. J.
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-395
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W2084256530
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 39.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/isre.1040.0036
- The paper
- Kirsch, L. J. (2004). Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.