Cited by 39Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWater Quality and Resources StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Impacts of a Soda Ash Facility on Onondaga Lake and the Seneca River, NY

Open access
Effler, Steven W., Matthews, David A.·2003·Lake and Reservoir Management

Abstract

A synthesis of the impacts of the operation (1884–1986) of a soda ash (Na2CO3) manufacturing facility on Onondaga Lake, NY, its tributaries, and adjoining portions of the river that receives the lake's outflow is presented, based on long-term programs of monitoring, process studies, and mathematical modeling. The lake was used as a source of cooling water and for the disposal of ionic (Cl− Na+, and Ca2+) waste, related solids and spent cooling water. At peak production the facility discharged ~1.3 × 106 metric tons of ionic waste to the lake annually. The soda ash facility had a profound impact on these ecosystems, by severely altering their structure and function. Portions of the two largest tributaries to the lake have been degraded from solids deposition associated with solution mining for NaCl (process reactant) and precipitation of Ca2+ waste (as CaCO3). The cooling water operation recycled phosphorus enriched hypolimnetic waters to the epilimnion. Ionic waste impacts on the lake and river included: (1) high salinity (S~3%o), (2) plunging inflows made dense by high S, that altered fundamental features of the lake's stratification regime and exacerbated the problem of severe dissolved oxygen (DO) depletion, (3) S-based density stratification and severe DO depletion over a 14 km reach of the river downstream of the lake, and (4) high levels of CaCO3 precipitation that reduced clarity, increased net sedimentation in pelagic areas, altered the character of near-shore sediments, and reduced alkalinity and pH. These impacts on the lake's chemistry and physical properties had profound effects on biological communities, including: (1) altered composition, (2) reduced richness and diversity, (3) limited macrophyte occurrence, (4) enhanced phytoplankton production, and (5) limited effectiveness of zooplankton grazing, thereby preventing intervals of high clarity. Closure of the facility resulted in dramatic improvements in water quality and ecological characteristics of these systems. Further improvement is expected as residual ionic waste loads decrease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07438140309353940

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of the industrial facility on Onondaga Lake were largely eliminated by closure of the facility.

    “These effects were largely eliminated by the closure of the facility (Effler and Matthews 2003).”

    From Implications of redox processes for the rehabilitation of an urban lake, Onondaga Lake, New York (2008) · cites this paper as Effler and Matthews 2003

    The Synthesis/Management Perspectives (p. 19) reports dramatic improvements in Onondaga Lake’s water quality and ecology after closure. But the same section (p. 20) says residual ionic waste loading continued and “a number of the impacts have only been reduced not eliminated,” so the claim overstates the extent of recovery. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The soda ash facility discharged more than 1.0 × 10^6 metric tons of ionic waste to Onondaga Lake annually during 1940-1986, causing the lake to be unusually saline.

    “The facility discharged >1.0 × 10 6 metric tons of ionic waste to the lake annually during 1940-1986, causing the lake to be unusually saline (Effler and Matthews 2003)”

    From Assessment of Long-term Trends in the Oxygen Resources of a Recovering Urban Lake, Onondaga Lake, New York (2006) · cites this paper as Effler and Matthews 2003

    The Abstract (p. 2) says the facility discharged about 1.3 million metric tons of ionic waste annually at peak production and identifies high salinity as an impact. The Ionic Waste section (p. 6) estimates an annual average of 1.2 million metric tons for 1974–1985, but does not establish that discharges exceeded 1.0 million metric tons every year throughout 1940–1986. The stated duration therefore overextends the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Saline wastes from soda ash manufacture had profound impacts on the biological, chemical, and physical characteristics of Onondaga Lake.

    “Saline wastes (Ca 2+ , Na + , Cl -) from the manufacture of soda ash had profound impacts on the biological, chemical, and physical characteristics of the lake (Effler and Matthews 2003).”
  • The soda ash facility's ionic discharge caused chemical stratification in Onondaga Lake.

    “this facility's ionic discharge caused chemical stratification in the lake”
  • High calcium concentrations increased deposition losses of particles (including phytoplankton) from the trophogenic layers of Onondaga Lake.

    “and thus increased deposition losses of particles (including phytoplankton) from the trophogenic layers (Effler et al. 2001;Effler and Matthews 2003).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Siegfried, N. A. Auer, J. D. Madsen, R. M. Smart, L. W. Eichler, C. W. Boylen, J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, B. A. Wagner, R. Danehey, N. A. Ringler, C. Gandino, P. Hirethota, P. Tango, M. A. Arrigo, C. Morgan, C. Millard, M. Murphy, R. J. Sloan, S. L. Niehaus and K. A. Whitehead. 1996a. Biology. P. 384-534. In: S. W. Effler (ed.). Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, NY.
  2. Effler, S. W. 1996. Limnological and engineering analysis of a polluted urban lake. Prelude to environmental management of Onondaga Lake, New York. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Effler, S. W., & Matthews, D. A.
Affiliations
Upstate Freshwater Institute (US)
Venue
Lake and Reservoir Management
Published
2003-12
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
285-306
ISSN
  • 0743-8141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-2381
  • 2151-5530
OpenAlex
W2066682276
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Lake and Reservoir Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Keywords
Onondaga Lake, industrial wastewater discharge, cooling water, solution mining, saltwater intrusion, salinity, lake stratification, dissolved oxygen depletion, calcium carbonate precipitation, sedimentation, water transparency, lake alkalinity, aquatic plants, phytoplankton, zooplankton grazing, fish assemblages, facility closure, water remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review