Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomized controlled trial of the effects of mindfulness practice on doctoral candidate psychological status

Barry, Karen May, Woods, Megan, Martin, Angela, Stirling, Christine, Warnecke, Emma·2019·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the impact of guided mindfulness practice on psychological distress and psychological capital (hope, optimism, resilience, and efficacy) in doctoral candidates. Participants: Recruitment of a convenience sample of doctoral candidates occurred in July 2015 and participants were randomly allocated to the control or intervention group (38 and 34 participants completed the trial, respectively). Methods: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. The intervention consisted of a daily guided mindfulness practice, using an audio CD. Indicators of psychological distress and psychological capital were measured pre- and post-trial with validated questionnaires. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group reported a statistically significantly reduction in depression ( p = .045) and increased self-efficacy ( p = .004), hope ( p = .000), and resilience ( p = .011). Conclusions: These results highlight the effectiveness of self-administered mindfulness practice on the psychological health of doctoral candidates, and the positive effect on psychological capital is reported as a key finding.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515760

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Panger G, 2014, Graduate Student Happiness & Wellbeing Report
  2. 10.1080/03075079.2014.899344 · DOI
  3. 10.5402/2012/934941 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/03075079.2011.576338 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/13562517.2011.560381 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/03075079.2011.594593 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/07294360.2012.692666 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.004 · DOI
  10. 10.1176/appi.ap.32.1.44 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1985.tb02621.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007 · DOI
  13. Luthans F, 2007, Psychological capital
  14. 10.1177/1052562914564980 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/08832323.2011.609844 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/2278533720130202 · DOI
  17. 10.4236/psych.2012.312A178 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Lovibond SH, 1993, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
  19. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cohen S, 1988, The Social Psychology of Health
  21. 10.5172/mra.455.2.1.71 · DOI
  22. 10.28945/2347 · DOI
  23. 10.4103/2395-2296.163936 · DOI
  24. Krupka Z, 2015, Conversation
  25. Martina K, 2017, S Afr J Psychol

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Martin, A., Stirling, C., & Warnecke, E.
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2018-11-02
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
299-307
ISSN
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
Cited by
49
References
10
Language
en
Funders
Teaching Development Grant, University of Tasmania (TDG_D3)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review